World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
23200
World Ranking
17120
National Ranking
8577

Daniel J. Cox publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Cox sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 265 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel J. Cox D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Cox sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel J. Cox is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States and has contributed to research primarily in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism. Their work intersects several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Clinical Psychology.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Diet and Metabolism Studies
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Marine and Fisheries Research
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies

Frequent publication venues for Daniel J. Cox include:

  • Diabetes
  • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
  • Journal of the Endocrine Society
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Co-authors who have collaborated regularly with Daniel J. Cox are:

  • Matthew Moncrief
  • Anthony L. McCall
  • Tom Banton
  • Tamara K. Oser
  • Mark R. Conaway

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel J. Cox include:

  • Minimizing Glucose Excursions (GEM) With Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial, 2020, Journal of the Endocrine Society
  • A Pilot Study Comparing Newly Licensed Drivers With and Without Autism and Experienced Drivers in Simulated and On-Road Driving, 2020, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Glycemic Excursion Minimization in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes: A Novel Intervention Tested in a Randomized Clinical Trial, 2020, BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Glycemic Excursion Minimization (GEM) to Weight Loss (WL) in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes, 2021, BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

In addition to these, Daniel J. Cox contributed as a co-author to a 2022 pilot feasibility study on a lifestyle intervention using continuous glucose monitoring, published in JMIR Diabetes.

Best Publications

  • Evaluating Clinical Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose

    William L Clarke;Daniel Cox;Linda A Gonder-Frederick;William Carter

  • A Behavior Change Model for Internet Interventions

    Lee M. Ritterband;Frances P. Thorndike;Daniel J. Cox;Boris P. Kovatchev

  • Reduced Awareness of Hypoglycemia in Adults With IDDM: A prospective study of hypoglycemic frequency and associated symptoms

    William L Clarke;Daniel J Cox;Linda A Gonder-Frederick;Diana Julian

  • Fear of Hypoglycemia: Quantification, Validation, and Utilization

    Daniel J Cox;Audrey Irvine;Linda Gonder-Frederick;George Nowacek

  • Major developments in behavioral diabetes research.

    Daniel J. Cox;Linda Gonder-Frederick

  • Internet interventions: In review, in use, and into the future.

    Lee M. Ritterband;Linda A. Gonder-Frederick;Daniel J. Cox;Allan D. Clifton

  • Psychosocial Therapies in Diabetes: Report of the Psychosocial Therapies Working Group

    Alan M. Delamater;Alan M. Jacobson;Barbara Anderson;Daniel Cox

  • Evaluating the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose-Monitoring Sensors: Continuous glucose–error grid analysis illustrated by TheraSense Freestyle Navigator data

    Boris P. Kovatchev;Linda A. Gonder-Frederick;Daniel J. Cox;William L. Clarke

  • A review of driving risks and impairments associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and the effects of stimulant medication on driving performance.

    Russell A. Barkley;Daniel Cox

  • Relationships between hyperglycemia and cognitive performance among adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

    Daniel J. Cox;Boris P. Kovatchev;Linda A. Gonder-Frederick;Kent H. Summers;Kent H. Summers

  • Evaluation of a new measure of blood glucose variability in diabetes.

    Boris P. Kovatchev;Erik Otto;Daniel Cox;Linda Gonder-Frederick

  • Accuracy of Perceiving Blood Glucose in IDDM

    Daniel J Cox;William L Clarke;Linda Gonder-Frederick;Stephen Pohl

  • Behavioral science in diabetes. Contributions and opportunities.

    Russell E. Glasgow;Edwin B. Fisher;Barbara J. Anderson;Annette LaGreca

  • Assessment of risk for severe hypoglycemia among adults with IDDM: validation of the low blood glucose index.

    B P Kovatchev;D J Cox;L A Gonder-Frederick;D Young-Hyman

  • Diabetes and behavioral medicine: the second decade.

    Linda A. Gonder-Frederick;Daniel J. Cox;Lee M. Ritterband

  • Psychometric Properties of the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

    Linda A. Gonder-Frederick;Karen M. Schmidt;Karen A. Vajda;Megan L. Greear

  • Symmetrization of the Blood Glucose Measurement Scale and Its Applications

    Boris P Kovatchev;Daniel J Cox;Linda A Gonder-Frederick;William Clarke

  • Progressive hypoglycemia's impact on driving simulation performance. Occurrence, awareness and correction.

    Daniel J. Cox;Linda A. Gonder-Frederick;B. P. Kovatchev;D. M. Julian

  • Method, system, and computer program product for the processing of self-monitoring blood glucose(smbg)data to enhance diabetic self-management

    Boris P. Kovatchev;Daniel J. Cox

  • Blood glucose awareness training (BGAT-2): long-term benefits.

    Daniel J. Cox;Linda Gonder-Frederick;William Polonsky;David Schlundt

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee M. Ritterband
Lee M. Ritterband University of Virginia
David G. Schlundt
David G. Schlundt Vanderbilt University
Hartmut Schächinger
Hartmut Schächinger University of Trier
Amori Yee Mikami
Amori Yee Mikami University of British Columbia
James W. Pennebaker
James W. Pennebaker The University of Texas at Austin
Mark R. Conaway
Mark R. Conaway University of Virginia
Philip E. Cryer
Philip E. Cryer Washington University in St. Louis
Lynn S. Walker
Lynn S. Walker Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Karen S. Ingersoll
Karen S. Ingersoll University of Virginia
Stuart Brody
Stuart Brody Charles University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare but seeking flexible educational options, a variety of related online degrees and certifications can open doors to rewarding careers. Online programs offer the ability to balance studies with work or family obligations, making them a popular option for non-traditional students and career changers.

If you’re drawn to the administrative side of healthcare, consider pursuing a bachelor of health information management online. This degree prepares you for vital roles within hospitals and clinics, focusing on data integrity and patient privacy.

Those looking to swiftly enter the workforce might explore the cheapest medical coding certification online. Medical billing and coding professionals are in strong demand, offering a pathway to healthcare employment in as little as a few months.

For individuals motivated to provide direct patient care, there are online nursing programs at various levels. Additionally, experienced nurses aiming for advanced practice roles can benefit from the cheapest fnp programs online to become Family Nurse Practitioners.

Exploring these online healthcare pathways can help you find a program that fits your personal goals and budget, while still making a meaningful impact in the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel J. Cox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles