World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
73
Citations
16778
World Ranking
1992
National Ranking
114

Frank J. Snoek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank J. Snoek sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 270 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Frank J. Snoek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank J. Snoek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank J. Snoek is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on the subfield of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism.

The scientist's work centers on Diabetes Management and Research, including Diabetes Management and Education, Diabetes Treatment and Management, and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management. Their main topics of study also include Diabetes and associated disorders, Birth, Development, and Health, as well as Pancreatic function and diabetes.

Frequent publication venues for Frank J. Snoek include:

  • Diabetic Medicine
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
  • Frontiers in Clinical Diabetes and Healthcare
  • Diabetes
  • Diabetes Therapy

Some recent papers associated with their research cover a range of diabetes-related topics:

  • The Management of Type 1 Diabetes in Adults. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), 2021, Diabetes Care
  • The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), 2021, Diabetologia
  • Efficacy and Moderators of Internet-Based Interventions in Adults with Subthreshold Depression: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials, 2020, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
  • The statistical approach in trial-based economic evaluations matters: get your statistics together!, 2021, BMC Health Services Research
  • Metabolic phenotypes of early gestational diabetes mellitus and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes, 2020, Diabetic Medicine

Frank J. Snoek regularly collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Maartje de Wit
  • Gernot Desoyé
  • David Simmons
  • Jürgen Harreiter
  • Rosa Corcoy

Best Publications

  • Depression as a risk factor for the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A meta-analysis

    M J Knol;Jos W R Twisk;Jos W R Twisk;Aartjan T F Beekman;R. J. Heine

  • Diabetes-related emotional distress in Dutch and U.S. diabetic patients: cross-cultural validity of the problem areas in diabetes scale.

    F J Snoek;F Pouwer;G W Welch;W H Polonsky

  • The prevalence of diabetes-specific emotional distress in people with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Nikki Perrin;M J Davies;N Robertson;F J Snoek

  • Short-form measures of diabetes-related emotional distress: the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID)-5 and PAID-1.

    B.E. McGuire;T.G. Morrison;N. Hermanns;S. Skovlund

  • Effect of interventions for major depressive disorder and significant depressive symptoms in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Christina M. van der Feltz-Cornelis;Jasper Nuyen;Corinne Stoop;Juliana Chan

  • Diabetes structured self-management education programmes: a narrative review and current innovations.

    Sudesna Chatterjee;Melanie J Davies;Simon Heller;Jane Speight

  • Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;David Daniel Ebert;Liesje Donkin;Heleen Riper

  • Rates and risks for co-morbid depression in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results from a community-based study

    F Pouwer;Aartjan T F Beekman;G Nijpels;J M Dekker

  • The Confidence in Diabetes Self-Care Scale: Psychometric properties of a new measure of diabetes-specific self-efficacy in Dutch and U.S. patients with type 1 diabetes

    Nicole C W Van Der Ven;Katie Weinger;Katie Weinger;Joyce Yi;Frans Pouwer

  • Diabetes-specific emotional distress mediates the association between depressive symptoms and glycaemic control in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.

    K.M.P. van Bastelaar;F. Pouwer;P.H.L.M. Geelhoed-Duijvestijn;C.J. Tack

  • Psychometric and screening properties of the WHO-5 well-being index in adult outpatients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus

    T R S Hajos;F Pouwer;S E Skovlund;B L Den Oudsten

  • Prevalence of comorbid depression is high in out-patients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Results from three out-patient clinics in the Netherlands.

    F. Pouwer;P.H.L.M. Geelhoed-Duijvestijn;C.J. Tack;E. Bazelmans

  • Efficacy of a web-based intervention with mobile phone support in treating depressive symptoms in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

    Stephanie Nobis;Dirk Lehr;David D aniel Ebert;Harald Baumeister

  • Monitoring of Individual Needs in Diabetes (MIND): Baseline Data From the Cross-National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) MIND Study

    Frank J. Snoek;Nancy Y.A. Kersch;Ebbe Eldrup;Ilana Harman-Boehm

  • Nurses’ recognition and registration of depression, anxiety and diabetes-specific emotional problems in outpatients with diabetes mellitus

    François Pouwer;Aartjan T.F. Beekman;Caroline Lubach;Frank J. Snoek

  • Epidemiology of gestational diabetes mellitus according to IADPSG/WHO 2013 criteria among obese pregnant women in Europe

    Aoife M. Egan;Akke Vellinga;Jürgen Harreiter;David Simmons

  • Cognitive performance in type 1 diabetes patients is associated with cerebral white matter volume

    A. M. Wessels;S. A. R. B. Rombouts;P. L. Remijnse;Y. Boom

  • Monitoring of Psychological Well-Being in Outpatients With Diabetes Effects on mood, HbA1c, and the patient’s evaluation of the quality of diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial

    F Pouwer;F J Snoek;H M van der Ploeg;H J Adèr

  • Does Internet-based guided-self-help for depression cause harm? An individual participant data meta-analysis on deterioration rates and its moderators in randomized controlled trials.

    D. D. Ebert;L. Donkin;Gerhard Andersson;G. Andrews

  • Insulin-treated diabetes patients with fear of self-injecting or fear of self-testing: psychological comorbidity and general well-being.

    E.D Mollema;F.J Snoek;Herman J Adèr;R.J Heine

  • Psychological counselling in problematic diabetes: does it help?

    F. J. Snoek;T. C. Skinner

Frequent Co-Authors

Frans Pouwer
Frans Pouwer University of Southern Denmark
Robert J. Heine
Robert J. Heine VU University Medical Center
Frederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof University College London
Martin Klein
Martin Klein Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Michaela Diamant
Michaela Diamant VU University Medical Center
David Daniel Ebert
David Daniel Ebert Technical University of Munich
Giel Nijpels
Giel Nijpels VU University Medical Center
Heleen Riper
Heleen Riper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dirk Lehr
Dirk Lehr Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Jos W. R. Twisk
Jos W. R. Twisk Amsterdam UMC

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens multiple doors, especially if you are considering careers in counseling, mental health, or social work. One key trend is the growing availability of accelerated and online counseling programs, which allow students to fast-track their studies and enter the workforce sooner. These flexible options are ideal for those looking to balance education with work or family commitments.

If you are interested in the fastest route to a counseling career, several states offer exciting pathways. For Michiganders, the Michigan fastest counseling programs guide highlights state-specific degree requirements, licensure steps, and top accelerated schools. Similarly, those in Minnesota can benefit from insights in the fastest way to become a counselor in Minnesota overview, while the fastest way to become a counselor in Mississippi guide details streamlined degree and licensing options in Mississippi.

In Missouri, you can explore options through Missouri accelerated counseling programs, which focus on speed, flexibility, and state requirements. As online education continues to grow, these pathways help you find the right fit for your career goals, whether you pursue clinical practice or other psychology roles.

Best Scientists Citing Frank J. Snoek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles