World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
29170
World Ranking
16960
National Ranking
8506

Mark Peyrot publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Peyrot sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 239 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark Peyrot D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Peyrot sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Peyrot is affiliated with Loyola University Maryland in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a focus on subfields including Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Surgery, and Occupational Therapy.

The main topics covered in Peyrot's work include:

  • Diabetes Management and Education
  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
  • Diabetes and associated disorders

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Peyrot include:

  • A standard set of person-centred outcomes for diabetes mellitus: results of an international and unified approach, 2020, Diabetic Medicine
  • Hypoglycemia in patient with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin: it can happen, 2020, BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Motivation: key to a healthy lifestyle in people with diabetes? Current and emerging knowledge and applications, 2020, Diabetic Medicine
  • Effect of a telemedicine intervention for diabetes-related foot ulcers on health, well-being and quality of life: secondary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial (DiaFOTo), 2020, BMC Endocrine Disorders
  • Living with diabetes: literature review and secondary analysis of qualitative data, 2020, Diabetic Medicine

Frequent co-authors associated with Peyrot include:

  • Stacy Lee Burns
  • Marjolein M. Iversen
  • Jannicke Igland
  • Grethe S. Tell
  • Beth Mitchell

Several publication venues have featured Peyrot's work multiple times. These include:

  • Diabetic Medicine
  • BMC Endocrine Disorders
  • Research Square
  • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Canadian Journal of Diabetes

In addition to articles, Peyrot has authored book publications, including:

  • Social Problems and Social Control in Criminal Justice, published by Lynne Rienner Publishers in 2022

Best Publications

  • National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education

    Martha M. Funnell;Tammy L. Brown;Belinda P. Childs;Linda B. Haas

  • Quality of life and diabetes

    Richard R. Rubin;Mark Peyrot;Mark Peyrot

  • Depression and Diabetes Treatment Nonadherence: A Meta-Analysis

    Jeffrey S. Gonzalez;Mark Peyrot;Mark Peyrot;Lauren McCarl;Erin Marie Collins

  • Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: results of the Cross-National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study

    Mark Peyrot;R. R. Rubin;T. Lauritzen;F. J. Snoek

  • Psychosocial Care for People With Diabetes: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association

    Deborah Young-Hyman;Mary de Groot;Felicia Hill-Briggs;Jeffrey S. Gonzalez

  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for the onset of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    A. Nouwen;Kirsty Winkley;J. Twisk;C. E. Lloyd

  • Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2™): Cross‐national benchmarking of diabetes‐related psychosocial outcomes for people with diabetes

    A. Nicolucci;K. Kovacs Burns;R. I. G. Holt;M. Comaschi

  • Resistance to Insulin Therapy Among Patients and Providers Results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) study

    Mark Peyrot;Mark Peyrot;Richard R. Rubin;Torsten Lauritzen;Soren E. Skovlund

  • Insulin adherence behaviours and barriers in the multinational Global Attitudes of Patients and Physicians in Insulin Therapy study

    M. Peyrot;M. Peyrot;A. H. Barnett;Luigi F Meneghini;P. M. Schumm-Draeger

  • Levels and Risks of Depression and Anxiety Symptomatology Among Diabetic Adults

    Mark Peyrot;Richard R Rubin

  • Correlates of Insulin Injection Omission

    Mark Peyrot;Richard R. Rubin;Davida F. Kruger;Luther B. Travis

  • The impact of barriers and self-efficacy on self-care behaviors in type 2 diabetes

    Layla I. Aljasem;Mark Peyrot;Larry Wissow;Richard R. Rubin

  • Psychological issues and treatments for people with diabetes

    Richard R. Rubin;Mark Peyrot

  • A biopsychosocial model of glycemic control in diabetes: stress, coping and regimen adherence.

    Mark Peyrot;James F. McMurry;Davida F. Kruger

  • Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy and Depressive Symptoms: The association revisited

    Loretta Vileikyte;Howard Leventhal;Jeffrey S. Gonzalez;Mark Peyrot;Mark Peyrot

  • Diabetes Self-Management Education Core Outcomes Measures:

    Kathryn Mulcahy;Melinda Maryniuk;Malinda Peeples;Mark Peyrot

  • AADE7 Self-Care Behaviors.

    Donna Tomky;Marjorie Cypress;Devra Dang;Melinda Maryniuk

  • The Development and Validation of a Neuropathy- and Foot Ulcer-Specific Quality of Life Instrument

    Loretta Vileikyte;Mark Peyrot;Mark Peyrot;Christine Bundy;Richard R. Rubin

  • Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2™): cross-national benchmarking indicators for family members living with people with diabetes

    K Kovacs Burns;Antonio Nicolucci;Richard I G Holt;I. Willaing

  • Resistance to Insulin Therapy Among Patients and Providers: Results of the Cross-National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) Study Response to Phillipov and Phillips

    Mark Peyrot;Richard R. Rubin

Frequent Co-Authors

Frans Pouwer
Frans Pouwer University of Southern Denmark
Andrew J.M. Boulton
Andrew J.M. Boulton University of Manchester
Jeffrey S. Gonzalez
Jeffrey S. Gonzalez Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Antonio Nicolucci
Antonio Nicolucci Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
Anthony H. Barnett
Anthony H. Barnett University of Birmingham
Frank J. Snoek
Frank J. Snoek University of Amsterdam
Tore Wentzel-Larsen
Tore Wentzel-Larsen Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies
Grethe S. Tell
Grethe S. Tell University of Bergen
Arie Nouwen
Arie Nouwen Middlesex University
Leonard E. Egede
Leonard E. Egede Medical College of Wisconsin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying medicine in the USA, you may also be interested in alternative healthcare degrees and career pathways that offer flexibility and varying entry requirements. For those looking to change careers without prior nursing experience, direct entry msn programs allow non-nurses to earn a Master of Science in Nursing online in a shortened timeframe.

Aspiring nurses can also find easiest rn program options, which typically have more accessible admissions criteria. Some nursing schools have streamlined the application process even further by offering programs that do not require standardized tests. You can explore nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi for a quicker path into the field.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, pursuing a career in medical billing and coding is a smart option. There are several accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid, making this pathway both convenient and affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Peyrot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles