World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 59 3697 3409 2076 1871 179 13384

Korey K. Hood publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Korey K. Hood between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Korey K. Hood published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 13.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2021. 58 of the 329 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2021. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 36 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 30 publications
2001 2025

329 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Korey K. Hood: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 3
2007 3
2008 3
2009 5
2010 10
2011 9
2012 8
2013 13
2014 5
2015 11
2016 7
2017 13
2018 23
2019 26
2020 36
2021 38
2022 19
2023 33
2024 28
2025 30
Total 329
Download as CSV

Korey K. Hood publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Korey K. Hood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 179 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 179
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Korey K. Hood D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Korey K. Hood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 59
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Korey K. Hood is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions to the subfields of endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, genetics, surgery, general health professions, and epidemiology.

The scientist's main topics of work include diabetes management and research, diabetes and associated disorders, pancreatic function and diabetes, diabetes management and education, mobile health and mHealth applications, diabetes treatment and management, and chronic disease management strategies.

Frequent publication venues for Korey K. Hood encompass a range of journals dedicated to endocrinology and diabetes, including:

  • Diabetes
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
  • Diabetic Medicine
  • Diabetes Care

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Korey K. Hood demonstrate involvement in clinical trials and reviews focused on diabetes management technologies and treatments. Notable publications include:

  • Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes, 2020, JAMA
  • Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice, 2022, Endocrine Reviews
  • A comparison of two hybrid closed-loop systems in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes (FLAIR): a multicentre, randomised, crossover trial, 2021, The Lancet
  • Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Very Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes, 2022, New England Journal of Medicine
  • A Real-World Prospective Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Loop Open Source Automated Insulin Delivery System, 2020, Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Korey K. Hood collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • David M. Maahs
  • Ananta Addala
  • Jessie J. Wong
  • Diana Naranjo
  • Rayhan A. Lal

Best Publications

  • Psychosocial Care for People With Diabetes: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association

    Deborah Young-Hyman;Mary de Groot;Felicia Hill-Briggs;Jeffrey S. Gonzalez

  • Pediatric Self-management: A Framework for Research, Practice, and Policy

    Avani C. Modi;Ahna L. Pai;Kevin A. Hommel;Korey K. Hood

  • Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with Behavior Problem Children: One and Two Year Maintenance of Treatment Effects in the Family

    Sheila M. Eyberg;Beverly W. Funderburk;Toni L. Hembree-Kigin;Cheryl B. McNeil

  • Outcomes of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: Mothers' Reports of Maintenance Three to Six Years After Treatment

    Korey K. Hood;Sheila M. Eyberg

  • Type 1 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association

    Jane L. Chiang;David M. Maahs;Katharine C. Garvey;Korey K. Hood

  • Depressive Symptoms in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Association with diabetes-specific characteristics

    Korey K. Hood;Samantha Huestis;Allison Maher;Debbie Butler

  • Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Lori M Laffel;Lauren G Kanapka;Roy W Beck;Katherine Bergamo

  • A comparison of two hybrid closed-loop systems in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes (FLAIR): a multicentre, randomised, crossover trial.

    Richard M Bergenstal;Revital Nimri;Roy W Beck;Amy Criego

  • A meta-systems approach to evidence-based practice for children and adolescents.

    Anne E. Kazak;Kimberly Hoagwood;John R. Weisz;Korey Hood

  • Anxiety Symptoms in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: Association with Blood Glucose Monitoring and Glycemic Control

    Michele Herzer;Korey K. Hood

  • Updated and Revised Diabetes Family Conflict Scale

    Korey K. Hood;Deborah A. Butler;Barbara J. Anderson;Lori M.B. Laffel

  • Diabetes Device Use in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Barriers to Uptake and Potential Intervention Targets.

    Molly L. Tanenbaum;Sarah J. Hanes;Kellee M. Miller;Diana Naranjo

  • Predictors of Deteriorations in Diabetes Management and Control in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes

    Marisa E. Hilliard;Yelena P. Wu;Joseph Rausch;Joseph Rausch;Lawrence M. Dolan;Lawrence M. Dolan

  • Outcomes of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: A Comparison of Treatment Completers and Study Dropouts One to Three Years Later

    Stephen R. Boggs;Sheila M. Eyberg;Daniel L. Edwards;Arista Rayfield

  • Health-related quality of life across pediatric chronic conditions.

    Lisa M. Ingerski;Avani C. Modi;Avani C. Modi;Korey K. Hood;Korey K. Hood;Ahna L. Pai;Ahna L. Pai

  • Interventions With Adherence-Promoting Components in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control

    Korey K. Hood;Jennifer M. Rohan;Claire M. Peterson;Dennis Drotar

  • One Year Clinical Experience of the First Commercial Hybrid Closed-Loop System.

    Rayhan A Lal;Marina Basina;David M Maahs;Korey Hood

  • Changes in Treatment Adherence and Glycemic Control During the Transition to Adolescence in Type 1 Diabetes

    Joseph R. Rausch;Korey K. Hood;Alan Delamater;Jennifer Shroff Pendley

  • Depressive Symptoms and Glycemic Control in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mediational role of blood glucose monitoring

    Meghan E. McGrady;Lori Michelle Burtz Laffel;Dennis Drotar;David Repaske

  • Psychosocial burden and glycemic control during the first 6 years of diabetes: results from the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study

    Korey K. Hood;Daniel P. Beavers;Joyce Yi-Frazier;Ronny Bell

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Maahs
David M. Maahs Stanford University
Bruce A. Buckingham
Bruce A. Buckingham Stanford University
Lori M.B. Laffel
Lori M.B. Laffel Harvard Medical School
Alan M. Delamater
Alan M. Delamater University of Miami
Jean M. Lawrence
Jean M. Lawrence National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Desmond A. Schatz
Desmond A. Schatz University of Florida
Roy W. Beck
Roy W. Beck University of South Florida
Jeffrey S. Gonzalez
Jeffrey S. Gonzalez Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Linda A. DiMeglio
Linda A. DiMeglio Indiana University
Avani C. Modi
Avani C. Modi Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology opens the door to many online study options and diverse career paths. Many aspiring professionals choose to become licensed therapists, a role that requires both academic qualifications and specific state licensure. While the foundational steps—such as earning a relevant degree and completing supervised clinical hours—are similar across the U.S., each state has unique requirements that must be met.

For example, you can learn more about licensed therapist requirements in Kansas City, or explore step-by-step information about how to become a licensed therapist in Laredo. If you’re interested in opportunities in Nevada, see the process for becoming a licensed therapist in Las Vegas. Additionally, find out the licensed therapist requirements in Lexington for a comprehensive comparison.

By understanding the pathways to licensure and the flexibility of online degrees, you can better plan your educational and career journey in Psychology, no matter which city or state you wish to practice in.

Best Scientists Citing Korey K. Hood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles