World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 101 7886 7414 4109 3800 481 43691

Lori M.B. Laffel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lori M.B. Laffel between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lori M.B. Laffel published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 14.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2022. 81 of the 567 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2022. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 44 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 53 publications 2021: 44 publications 2022: 57 publications 2023: 31 publications 2024: 39 publications 2025: 42 publications
1988 2025

567 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lori M.B. Laffel: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 2
1990 1
1991 4
1992 5
1993 2
1994 1
1995 3
1996 3
1997 2
1998 1
1999 5
2000 7
2001 6
2002 3
2003 4
2004 8
2005 7
2006 7
2007 16
2008 7
2009 16
2010 11
2011 13
2012 17
2013 14
2014 12
2015 20
2016 10
2017 19
2018 44
2019 29
2020 53
2021 44
2022 57
2023 31
2024 39
2025 42
Total 567
Download as CSV

Lori M.B. Laffel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lori M.B. Laffel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 481 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 481
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Lori M.B. Laffel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lori M.B. Laffel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 101
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lori M.B. Laffel is affiliated with Harvard Medical School in the United States and has a substantial body of research within the field of medicine, particularly focusing on endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism. Their work spans subfields including surgery, genetics, speech and hearing, and general health professions.

Their research primarily concentrates on topics related to diabetes management and research, pancreatic function and diabetes, diabetes and associated disorders, diabetes treatment and management, adolescent and pediatric healthcare, diabetes management and education, and mobile health and mHealth applications.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lori M.B. Laffel include Lisa K. Volkening, Jennifer L. Sherr, Gregory P. Forlenza, Bruce A. Buckingham, and Sue A. Brown. These collaborations have contributed to multiple research outputs and advance the understanding of diabetes care and technology.

Laffel has notable publications in influential journals and venues, with frequent contributions to Diabetes, Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, Diabetes Care, Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, and Pediatric Diabetes. The number of publications in these venues reflects an ongoing engagement with leading platforms for diabetes research.

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Lori M.B. Laffel include:

  • Continuous glucose monitoring and metrics for clinical trials: an international consensus statement (2022), The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes (2020), JAMA
  • Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice (2022), Endocrine Reviews
  • A comparison of two hybrid closed-loop systems in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes (FLAIR): a multicentre, randomised, crossover trial (2021), The Lancet
  • Multicenter Trial of a Tubeless, On-Body Automated Insulin Delivery System With Customizable Glycemic Targets in Pediatric and Adult Participants With Type 1 Diabetes (2021), Diabetes Care

Best Publications

  • Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range

    Tadej Battelino;Thomas Danne;Richard M. Bergenstal;Stephanie A. Amiel

  • Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.

    Tamborlane Wv;Beck Rw;Bode Bw

  • International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring

    Thomas Danne;Revital Nimri;Tadej Battelino;Richard M. Bergenstal

  • Ketone bodies: a review of physiology, pathophysiology and application of monitoring to diabetes

    Lori Laffel

  • Care of Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes A statement of the American Diabetes Association

    Janet Silverstein;Georgeanna Klingensmith;Kenneth Copeland;Leslie Plotnick

  • Type 1 Diabetes Through the Life Span: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association

    Jane L. Chiang;M. Sue Kirkman;Lori M.B. Laffel;Anne L. Peters

  • Predisposition to hypertension and susceptibility to renal disease in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

    A. S. Krolewski;M. Canessa;J. H. Warram;L. M. B. Laffel

  • Exercise management in type 1 diabetes: a consensus statement.

    Michael C Riddell;Ian W Gallen;Carmel E Smart;Craig E Taplin

  • Parental involvement in diabetes management tasks: relationships to blood glucose monitoring adherence and metabolic control in young adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

    Barbara Anderson;Joyce Ho;Julienne Brackett;Dianne Finkelstein

  • Glycosylated Hemoglobin and the Risk of Microalbuminuria in Patients with Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

    Andrzej S. Krolewski;Lori M.B. Laffel;Martin Krolewski;Maryanne Quinn

  • Diabetes Care for Emerging Adults: Recommendations for Transition From Pediatric to Adult Diabetes Care Systems

    Anne Peters;Lori Michelle Burtz Laffel

  • Type 1 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association

    Jane L. Chiang;David M. Maahs;Katharine C. Garvey;Korey K. Hood

  • An office-based intervention to maintain parent-adolescent teamwork in diabetes management. Impact on parent involvement, family conflict, and subsequent glycemic control.

    Barbara J. Anderson;Julienne Brackett;Joyce Ho;Lori M B Laffel

  • The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes.

    Roy W Beck;Irl B Hirsch;Lori Laffel

  • Depressive Symptoms in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Association with diabetes-specific characteristics

    Korey K. Hood;Samantha Huestis;Allison Maher;Debbie Butler

  • High-dose vitamin E supplementation normalizes retinal blood flow and creatinine clearance in patients with type 1 diabetes.

    S E Bursell;A C Clermont;L P Aiello;L M Aiello

  • Family conflict, adherence, and glycaemic control in youth with short duration Type 1 diabetes

    Barbara J Anderson;L Vangsness;A Connell;D Butler

  • Effect of duration of type I diabetes on the prevalence of stages of diabetic nephropathy defined by urinary albumin/creatinine ratio.

    J H Warram;G Gearin;L Laffel;A S Krolewski

  • Adherence challenges in the management of type 1 diabetes in adolescents: prevention and intervention.

    Joshua S Borus;Lori Laffel

  • Impact of ambulatory, family-focused teamwork intervention on glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes.

    Lori M.B. Laffel;Laura Vangsness;Alexa Connell;Ann Goebel-Fabbri

Frequent Co-Authors

William V. Tamborlane
William V. Tamborlane Yale University
Norman K. Hollenberg
Norman K. Hollenberg Brigham and Women's Hospital
Roy W. Beck
Roy W. Beck University of South Florida
Andrzej S. Krolewski
Andrzej S. Krolewski Harvard University
Korey K. Hood
Korey K. Hood Stanford University
James H. Warram
James H. Warram Harvard University
Denise L. Haynie
Denise L. Haynie National Institutes of Health
Jean M. Lawrence
Jean M. Lawrence National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Bruce A. Buckingham
Bruce A. Buckingham Stanford University
David S. Ludwig
David S. Ludwig Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Medicine but want alternative or complementary career options, online medical and healthcare degrees offer flexible, affordable ways to enter rewarding fields. Many students explore related areas before or during their journey to becoming a doctor, helping them build valuable experience and expand their career opportunities.

Medical billing and coding is a popular choice for those looking to start a healthcare career quickly. Concerned about costs? Many schools offer medical billing and coding cost options with lower tuition and flexible schedules, making this a budget-friendly entry point.

If direct patient care interests you, consider online nursing degrees. There are programs such as online nurse practitioner programs and cheapest online accelerated bsn programs that allow you to advance quickly and affordably in the nursing field. For those aiming for advanced research or academic roles, online phd programs nursing are also available.

Exploring these online pathways can serve as stepping stones to or alternatives for a career in medicine, balancing quality education with financial practicality.

Best Scientists Citing Lori M.B. Laffel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles