World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
110
Citations
48042
World Ranking
5529
National Ranking
2983

Philip E. Cryer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip E. Cryer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 345 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip E. Cryer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip E. Cryer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip E. Cryer is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and biological sciences, with particular focus on diabetes and metabolic disorders.

The main fields of study identified in their work include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these fields, their subfields of study are:

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Genetics
  • Surgery

Their research concentrates on several key topics connected to diabetes and pancreatic functions, including:

  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes

The available data does not list any recent papers authored by Philip E. Cryer, nor frequent co-authors or publication venues. Additionally, there are no recorded book publications or awards associated with this scientist in the provided information.

Best Publications

  • Hypoglycemia and Diabetes: A Report of a Workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and The Endocrine Society

    Elizabeth R. Seaquist;John Anderson;Belinda Childs;Philip Cryer

  • Hypoglycemia in Diabetes

    Philip E. Cryer;Stephen N. Davis;Harry Shamoon;Harry Shamoon

  • Norepinephrine and Epinephrine Release and Adrenergic Mediation of Smoking-Associated Hemodynamic and Metabolic Events

    Philip E. Cryer;Morey W. Haymond;Julio V. Santiago;Suresh D. Shah

  • Evaluation and Management of Adult Hypoglycemic Disorders: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline

    Philip E. Cryer;Lloyd Axelrod;Ashley B. Grossman;Simon R. Heller

  • Hypoglycaemia: the limiting factor in the glycaemic management of Type I and Type II diabetes

    Cryer Pe

  • Influence of body fat distribution on free fatty acid metabolism in obesity

    M. D. Jensen;M. W. Haymond;R. A. Rizza;Philip Cryer

  • Physiology and Pathophysiology of the Human Sympathoadrenal Neuroendocrine System

    Philip E. Cryer

  • The Barrier of Hypoglycemia in Diabetes

    Philip E. Cryer

  • Epinephrine plasma metabolic clearance rates and physiologic thresholds for metabolic and hemodynamic actions in man.

    W E Clutter;D M Bier;S D Shah;P E Cryer

  • Hierarchy of glycemic thresholds for counterregulatory hormone secretion, symptoms, and cerebral dysfunction

    A. Mitrakou;C. Ryan;T. Veneman;M. Mokan

  • Reduced neuroendocrine and symptomatic responses to subsequent hypoglycemia after 1 episode of hypoglycemia in nondiabetic humans

    Simon R Heller;Philip E Cryer

  • Memory improvement following induced hyperinsulinemia in alzheimer's disease

    Suzanne Craft;John Newcomer;Stephen Kanne;Samuel Dagogo-Jack

  • Hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Recent antecedent hypoglycemia reduces autonomic responses to, symptoms of, and defense against subsequent hypoglycemia.

    S E Dagogo-Jack;S Craft;P E Cryer

  • Role of Glucagon, Catecholamines, and Growth Hormone in Human Glucose Counterregulation: EFFECTS OF SOMATOSTATIN AND COMBINED α- AND β-ADRENERGIC BLOCKADE ON PLASMA GLUCOSE RECOVERY AND GLUCOSE FLUX RATES AFTER INSULIN-INDUCED HYPOGLYCEMIA

    Robert A. Rizza;Philip E. Cryer;John E. Gerich

  • Insulin independence after islet transplantation into type I diabetic patient

    David W Scharp;Paul E Lacy;Julio V Santiago;Christopher S McCullough

  • Diverse causes of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in diabetes.

    Philip E. Cryer

  • Glycemic thresholds for activation of glucose counterregulatory systems are higher than the threshold for symptoms.

    N. S. Schwartz;William Clutter;S. D. Shah;Philip Cryer

  • Mechanisms of Hypoglycemia-Associated Autonomic Failure and Its Component Syndromes in Diabetes

    Philip E. Cryer

  • The role of adrenergic mechanisms in the substrate and hormonal response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in man.

    A J Garber;P E Cryer;J V Santiago;M W Haymond

  • Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

    Philip E. Cryer

Frequent Co-Authors

John E. Gerich
John E. Gerich Mayo Clinic
Morey W. Haymond
Morey W. Haymond Baylor College of Medicine
Neil H. White
Neil H. White Washington University in St. Louis
William H. Daughaday
William H. Daughaday Washington University in St. Louis
Simon Heller
Simon Heller University of Sheffield
William J. Powers
William J. Powers University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Geremia B. Bolli
Geremia B. Bolli University of Perugia
Suzanne Craft
Suzanne Craft Wake Forest University
Jacobo Wortsman
Jacobo Wortsman Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
Stephen B. Liggett
Stephen B. Liggett University of South Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring careers in Medicine, there are diverse academic and professional pathways to consider—including those available online. For aspiring nurses, cost is a critical factor. Many students seek out the cheapest online rn to bsn programs to continue their education while balancing their finances.

Not all medical professionals start with a nursing background. For individuals with a non-nursing degree who want to transition into advanced nursing roles, online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses offer accelerated options to fast-track your career.

Admission competitiveness can be a concern. Some may look for the easiest rn program to get into to maximize their chances without compromising on quality.

For those seeking alternative healthcare roles, entering the field of medical administration is also an option. Programs such as online medical billing and coding with financial aid help students access valuable career skills with financial support, making education more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Philip E. Cryer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles