World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 46 3674 3389 154 147 129 7587

Omid Noroozi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Omid Noroozi between 2008 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Omid Noroozi published across 19 years, from 2008 to 2026, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2025. 26 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2025. 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 25 publications 2026: 1 publication
2008 2026

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Omid Noroozi: publications per year, 2008 to 2026
Year Publications
2008 2
2009 2
2010 3
2011 3
2012 12
2013 6
2014 2
2015 2
2016 5
2017 5
2018 5
2019 16
2020 16
2021 11
2022 10
2023 20
2024 14
2025 25
2026 1
Total 160
Download as CSV

Omid Noroozi publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Omid Noroozi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 129 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 129
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Omid Noroozi D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Omid Noroozi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228 46
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Omid Noroozi is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences, Psychology, and Computer Science, with a significant focus on Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology as main subfields. Their work also includes areas such as Computer Science Applications, Information Systems, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's research concentrates on themes related to Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, Online Learning and Analytics, Student Assessment and Feedback, and Online and Blended Learning. Additional topics covered in their work are Reflective Practices in Education, Educational Games and Gamification, as well as Education and Critical Thinking Development.

Recent papers authored by or co-authored with Omid Noroozi include the following titles:

  • A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research (2023), published in Innovations in Education and Teaching International
  • Teachers' online teaching expectations and experiences during the Covid19-pandemic in the Netherlands (2020), published in European Journal of Teacher Education
  • The mediating role of digital informal learning in the relationship between students' digital competence and their academic performance (2021), published in Computers & Education
  • A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education (2022), published in Educational Research Review
  • Peer feedback or peer feedforward? Enhancing students' argumentative peer learning processes and outcomes (2021), published in British Journal of Educational Technology

Omid Noroozi frequently collaborates with several colleagues, including Seyyed Kazem Banihashem, H.J.A. Biemans, Mohammadreza Farrokhnia, Nafiseh Taghizadeh Kerman, and Stan van Ginkel.

Their research outputs are often published in notable venues such as Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Interactive Learning Environments, Education and Information Technologies, Computer-supported collaborative learning/\x98The \x9cComputer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, and International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

Best Publications

  • Argumentation-Based Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (ABCSCL): A Synthesis of 15 Years of Research.

    Omid Noroozi;Armin Weinberger;Harm J.A. Biemans;Martin Mulder

  • Using gamification to support learning English as a second language: a systematic review

    Hojjat Dehghanzadeh;Hashem Fardanesh;Javad Hatami;Ebrahim Talaee

  • Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL

    Omid Noroozi;Armin Weinberger;Harm J. A. Biemans;Martin Mulder

  • Multicultural student group work in higher education: a study on challenges as perceived by students

    V. Popov;B. Brinkman;H.J.A. Biemans;M. Mulder

  • Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay

    Omid Noroozi;Omid Noroozi;Harm J. A. Biemans;Martin Mulder

  • Promoting Argumentation Competence: Extending from First- to Second-Order Scaffolding Through Adaptive Fading

    Omid Noroozi;Omid Noroozi;Paul A. Kirschner;Paul A. Kirschner;Harm J.A. Biemans;Martin Mulder

  • The mediating role of digital informal learning in the relationship between students' digital competence and their academic performance

    Mahboobe Mehrvarz;Elham Heidari;Mohammadreza Farrokhnia;Omid Noroozi

  • Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback?

    Unknown

  • Peer feedback or peer feedforward? Enhancing students’ argumentative peer learning processes and outcomes

    Saeed Latifi;Omid Noroozi;Ebrahim Talaee

  • Multimodal data to design visual learning analytics for understanding regulation of learning

    Omid Noroozi;Omid Noroozi;Iman Alikhani;Sanna Järvelä;Paul A. Kirschner;Paul A. Kirschner

  • Facilitating Learning in Multidisciplinary Groups with Transactive CSCL Scripts.

    Omid Noroozi;Stephanie D. Teasley;Harm J. A. Biemans;Armin Weinberger

  • Using gamification to support learning in K-12 education: A systematic literature review

    Unknown

  • A systematic review on the impacts of game-based learning on argumentation skills

    Omid Noroozi;Hojjat Dehghanzadeh;Hojjat Dehghanzadeh;Ebrahim Talaee

  • Online peer feedback patterns of success and failure in argumentative essay writing

    Unknown

  • How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning

    Saeed Latifi;Omid Noroozi;Javad Hatami;Harm J.A. Biemans

  • Fostering oral presentation competence through a virtual reality-based task for delivering feedback

    Stan van Ginkel;Judith T. M. Gulikers;Harm J. A. Biemans;Omid Noroozi

  • Scripting for construction of a transactive memory system in multidisciplinary CSCL environments

    Omid Noroozi;Harm J.A. Biemans;Armin Weinberger;Martin Mulder

  • Students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: does gender matter?

    Omid Noroozi;Javad Hatami;Arash Bayat;Stan van Ginkel

  • Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: The effects of different instructional designs on conceptual understanding and knowledge co-construction

    Mohammadreza Farrokhnia;Héctor J. Pijeira-Díaz;Omid Noroozi;Javad Hatami

  • Differences in learning processes between successful and less successful students in computer-supported collaborative learning in the field of human nutrition and health

    Omid Noroozi;Harm J. A. Biemans;Maria C. Busstra;Martin Mulder

  • Perceptions and experiences of, and outcomes for, university students in culturally diversified dyads in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment

    Vitaliy Popov;Omid Noroozi;Jennifer B. Barrett;Harm J. A. Biemans

  • The effects of online peer feedback and epistemic beliefs on students’ argumentation-based learning

    Omid Noroozi;Javad Hatami

  • The effects of digital learning material on students’ mathematics learning in vocational education

    Diana P. Zwart;Johannes E. H. Van Luit;Omid Noroozi;Sui Lin Goei

Frequent Co-Authors

Harm J. A. Biemans
Harm J. A. Biemans Wageningen University & Research
Martin Mulder
Martin Mulder Wageningen University & Research
Paul A. Kirschner
Paul A. Kirschner Open University in the Netherlands
Armin Weinberger
Armin Weinberger Saarland University
Sanna Järvelä
Sanna Järvelä University of Oulu
Johannes E. H. Van Luit
Johannes E. H. Van Luit Utrecht University
Kathy Sylva
Kathy Sylva University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities opens many flexible online study paths in the USA. Students interested in advanced clinical roles might consider accelerated psyd programs that lead to psychologist credentials faster than traditional tracks. These programs often suit motivated candidates aiming for high-impact careers in mental health.

For those focused on family or couples therapy, mft online programs offer specialized online training that can put you on the path to becoming a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist. Many programs feature flexible learning options and can be completed in less time than you might expect.

If you want a broader psychology background, the best online masters in psychology programs provide affordable ways to deepen your knowledge and open doors to roles in counseling, research, or administration.

For aspiring academic leaders and educators, online doctorate of education programs help you reach top positions in education management or policy. Online formats and accelerated tracks mean you can advance your career with more flexibility and less time on campus.

Best Scientists Citing Omid Noroozi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles