World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 50 2751 2514 109 103 232 10741

Harm J. A. Biemans publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Harm J. A. Biemans between 1977 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Harm J. A. Biemans published across 45 years, from 1977 to 2021, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2007. 12 of the 219 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2007. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 5 publications
1977 2021

219 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Harm J. A. Biemans: publications per year, 1977 to 2021
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 3
1996 4
1997 2
1998 6
1999 5
2000 1
2001 1
2002 3
2003 14
2004 7
2005 8
2006 4
2007 19
2008 9
2009 9
2010 13
2011 11
2012 15
2013 19
2014 8
2015 7
2016 11
2017 10
2018 3
2019 13
2020 7
2021 5
Total 219
Download as CSV

Harm J. A. Biemans publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harm J. A. Biemans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 224–233 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 232 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213 232
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Harm J. A. Biemans D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harm J. A. Biemans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187 50
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Pedagogy
  • Management
  • Educational technology

Pedagogy, Competence, Higher education, Vocational education and Instructional design are his primary areas of study. His Pedagogy research incorporates themes from Likert scale, Engineering ethics, Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory and Medical education. Harm J. A. Biemans studied Competence and Focus group that intersect with Curriculum development and Concept learning.

His work deals with themes such as Mathematics education, Group work and Curriculum, which intersect with Higher education. His research investigates the connection between Vocational education and topics such as Teaching method that intersect with issues in Corporate governance and Popularity. His Instructional design research includes elements of Cooperative learning, Collaborative learning, Computer-supported collaborative learning and Empirical research.

His most cited work include:

  • Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the World Wide Web (259 citations)
  • Competence-based VET in the Netherlands: background and pitfalls (220 citations)
  • Teaching and Learning in Interdisciplinary Higher Education: A Systematic Review (201 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Competence, Pedagogy, Higher education, Mathematics education and Knowledge management. Harm J. A. Biemans has researched Competence in several fields, including Vocational education, Focus group, Engineering ethics and Medical education. Harm J. A. Biemans has included themes like Secondary education, Teaching method, Curriculum and Summative assessment in his Vocational education study.

His is involved in several facets of Pedagogy study, as is seen by his studies on Collaborative learning, Computer-supported collaborative learning, Cooperative learning, Instructional design and Educational research. His Mathematics education research integrates issues from Argumentative and Argumentation theory. The Open innovation research Harm J. A. Biemans does as part of his general Knowledge management study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Process, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Competence (34.67%)
  • Pedagogy (28.67%)
  • Higher education (21.33%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Mathematics education (20.00%)
  • Competence (34.67%)
  • Argumentative (8.67%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Harm J. A. Biemans focuses on Mathematics education, Competence, Argumentative, Peer feedback and Argumentation theory. His Mathematics education research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Vocational education and Curriculum. His study in Competence is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Knowledge management, Applied psychology, Medical education, Rubric and Cooperative learning.

His research investigates the connection between Argumentative and topics such as Quality that intersect with problems in Knowledge acquisition. To a larger extent, Harm J. A. Biemans studies Pedagogy with the aim of understanding Peer feedback. His work carried out in the field of Higher education brings together such families of science as Learning theory and Agency.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Testing the relationship between personality characteristics, contextual factors and entrepreneurial intentions in a developing country. (50 citations)
  • Promoting Argumentation Competence: Extending from First- to Second-Order Scaffolding Through Adaptive Fading (39 citations)
  • The Impact of the Feedback Source on Developing Oral Presentation Competence (26 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Pedagogy
  • Management
  • Educational technology

Harm J. A. Biemans mainly focuses on Competence, Rubric, Applied psychology, Mathematics education and Peer feedback. Harm J. A. Biemans conducts interdisciplinary study in the fields of Competence and Script theory through his works. His Rubric research includes themes of Metacognition, Video game, Virtual reality and Formative assessment.

His studies deal with areas such as Argumentation theory, Argumentative and Communication as well as Mathematics education. Peer feedback is a subfield of Pedagogy that Harm J. A. Biemans studies. His Pedagogy research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Educational quality and Perception.

Best Publications

  • The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education: A Study of Iranian Students' Entrepreneurial Intentions and Opportunity Identification

    Saeid Karimi;Harm J. A. Biemans;Thomas Lans;Mohammad Chizari

  • Teaching and Learning in Interdisciplinary Higher Education: A Systematic Review

    Elisabeth J. H. Spelt;Harm J. A. Biemans;Hilde Tobi;Pieternel A. Luning

  • Competence-based VET in the Netherlands: background and pitfalls

    Harm Biemans;Loek Nieuwenhuis;Rob Poell;Martin Mulder

  • Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the World Wide Web

    Ard W. Lazonder;Harm J. A. Biemans;Iwan G. J. H. Wopereis

  • Determining factors of the use of e-learning environments by university teachers

    Hossein Mahdizadeh;Harm Biemans;Martin Mulder

  • Identification of competencies for professionals in open innovation teams

    Elise du Chatenier;Jos A. A. M. Verstegen;Harm J. A. Biemans;Martin Mulder

  • Argumentation-Based Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (ABCSCL): A Synthesis of 15 Years of Research.

    Omid Noroozi;Armin Weinberger;Harm J.A. Biemans;Martin Mulder

  • The New Competence Concept in Higher Education: Error or Enrichment?

    Martin Mulder;Judith Gulikers;Harm Biemans;Renate Wesselink

  • Effects of role models and gender on students’ entrepreneurial intentions

    Saeid Karimi;Harm J.A. Biemans;Thomas Lans;Mohammad Chizari

  • Testing the relationship between personality characteristics, contextual factors and entrepreneurial intentions in a developing country.

    Saeid Karimi;Harm J.A. Biemans;Karim Naderi Mahdei;Thomas Lans

  • Understanding role Models and Gender Influences on Entrepreneurial Intentions Among College Students

    Saeid Karimi;Harm J.A. Biemans;Thomas Lans;Mohammad Chizari

  • Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL

    Omid Noroozi;Armin Weinberger;Harm J. A. Biemans;Martin Mulder

  • Towards a set of design principles for developing oral presentation competence: A synthesis of research in higher education

    Stan van Ginkel;Judith Gulikers;Harm Biemans;Martin Mulder

  • The Challenges of Collaborative Knowledge Creation in Open Innovation Teams

    Elise Du Chatenier;Jos A.A.M. Verstegen;Harm J.A. Biemans;Martin Mulder

  • Multicultural student group work in higher education: a study on challenges as perceived by students

    V. Popov;B. Brinkman;H.J.A. Biemans;M. Mulder

  • Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay

    Omid Noroozi;Omid Noroozi;Harm J. A. Biemans;Martin Mulder

  • Towards competence‐based VET: dealing with the pitfalls

    Harm Biemans;Renate Wesselink;Judith Gulikers;Sanne Schaafsma

  • Promoting Argumentation Competence: Extending from First- to Second-Order Scaffolding Through Adaptive Fading

    Omid Noroozi;Omid Noroozi;Paul A. Kirschner;Paul A. Kirschner;Harm J.A. Biemans;Martin Mulder

  • Competence-based VET as seen by Dutch researchers

    R. Wesselink;H.J.A. Biemans;M. Mulder;E. van den Elsen

  • Inquiry-Based Science Education Competencies of Primary School Teachers: A literature study and critical review of the American National Science Education Standards

    Ester Alake-Tuenter;Harm J. A. Biemans;Hilde Tobi;Arjen E. J. Wals

  • Competence development of entrepreneurs in innovative horticulture

    Martin Mulder;Thomas Lans;Jos Verstegen;Harm Biemans

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Mulder
Martin Mulder Wageningen University & Research
Omid Noroozi
Omid Noroozi Wageningen University & Research
Thomas Lans
Thomas Lans HAN University of Applied Sciences
Armin Weinberger
Armin Weinberger Saarland University
Paul A. Kirschner
Paul A. Kirschner Open University in the Netherlands
Onno Omta
Onno Omta Wageningen University & Research
Arjen E. J. Wals
Arjen E. J. Wals Wageningen University & Research
Harry Gruppen
Harry Gruppen Wageningen University & Research
Alphons G. J. Voragen
Alphons G. J. Voragen Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to a wide range of rewarding professional avenues. Today, online education offers greater flexibility and affordability, making it easier to advance your career while balancing other commitments. For those interested in human behavior, pursuing a masters in psychology online is a popular choice, offering both affordability and access to diverse specializations.

If you are interested in educational leadership roles, consider exploring shortest online edd programs that can fast-track your doctorate journey. Additionally, those looking for accelerated educational options may find 1 year master's programs or online bachelor's degree programs appealing, helping you enter the workforce or move up in your career faster.

Online and accelerated degrees can lead to careers in counseling, education, public policy, research, or non-profit leadership. When choosing a program, consider accreditation, faculty expertise, and career support services to ensure your investment helps you achieve your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Harm J. A. Biemans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles