World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
66
Citations
19932
World Ranking
2969
National Ranking
97

Melly S. Oitzl publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melly S. Oitzl sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 162 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Melly S. Oitzl D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melly S. Oitzl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Melly S. Oitzl is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. The academic profile shows a focus on scientific research conducted within this institution. The available data does not include specific details about their research topics, recent papers, or the subfields and fields of study associated with their work.

There are no recorded co-authors or frequent publication venues linked to Melly S. Oitzl in the provided data. Similarly, no information is available regarding book publications or awards that might have been received during their career.

Although no detailed publication record is present, the consistent association with the University of Amsterdam suggests an involvement in academic and research activities typical to this environment. Without data on research themes or contributions, it is not possible to further elaborate on the specific scientific disciplines or topics covered.

Overall, the profile outlines a researcher with a current institutional affiliation, but it lacks detailed publicly accessible records to describe their scientific output, collaboration network, or recognized achievements within their field.

Best Publications

  • Brain corticosteroid receptor balance in health and disease.

    E R De Kloet;E Vreugdenhil;M S Oitzl;M Joëls

  • Stress and cognition: are corticosteroids good or bad guys?

    E. Ron de Kloet;Melly S. Oitzl;Marian Joëls

  • Learning under stress: how does it work?

    Marian Joëls;Zhenwei Pu;Olof Wiegert;Melly S. Oitzl

  • Stress effects on memory: an update and integration

    Lars Schwabe;Marian Joëls;Benno Roozendaal;Oliver T. Wolf

  • Selective corticosteroid antagonists modulate specific aspects of spatial orientation learning.

    M S Oitzl;E R de Kloet

  • Brain development under stress: hypotheses of glucocorticoid actions revisited.

    Melly S. Oitzl;Danielle L. Champagne;Rixt van der Veen;E. Ronald de Kloet

  • Point mutation in the mouse glucocorticoid receptor preventing DNA binding impairs spatial memory

    M S Oitzl;H M Reichardt;M Joëls;E R de Kloet

  • Stress modulates the use of spatial versus stimulus-response learning strategies in humans.

    Lars Schwabe;Melly S. Oitzl;Christine Philippsen;Steffen Richter

  • Memory formation under stress: Quantity and quality

    Lars Schwabe;Oliver T. Wolf;Melly S. Oitzl

  • Interleukin-1β, but not interleukin-6, impairs spatial navigation learning

    Melly S. Oitzl;Helga van Oers;Bernd Schöbitz;Bernd Schöbitz;E. Ron de Kloet

  • The postnatal development of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in the mouse.

    Mathias V Schmidt;L Enthoven;M van der Mark;S Levine

  • Updating freeze: aligning animal and human research.

    Muriel A. Hagenaars;Melly Oitzl;Karin Roelofs

  • A refined method for sequential blood sampling by tail incision in rats.

    Marc Fluttert;Sergiu Dalm;Melly S. Oitzl

  • Functional implications of brain corticosteroid receptor diversity

    Er Dekloet;Oitzl;M Joels

  • Maternal deprivation affects behaviour from youth to senescence: amplification of individual differences in spatial learning and memory in senescent Brown Norway rats

    Melly S. Oitzl;Judith O. Workel;Marc Fluttert;Fawzia Frösch

  • The Effect of Corticosterone on Reactivity to Spatial Novelty is Mediated by Central Mineralocorticosteroid Receptors

    Melly S. Oitzl;Marc Fluttert;E. Ron de Kloet

  • Corticosteroids operate as a switch between memory systems

    Lars Schwabe;Hartmut Schächinger;E. Ron de Kloet;Melly S. Oitzl

  • Relevance of stress and female sex hormones for emotion and cognition.

    J. P. ter Horst;E. R. de Kloet;H. Schächinger;M. S. Oitzl

  • Brain mineralocorticoid receptors and centrally regulated functions

    E. Ronald de Kloet;Saskia A.B.E. van Acker;Rosana M. Sibug;Melly S. Oitzl

  • Chronic stress modulates the use of spatial and stimulus-response learning strategies in mice and man.

    Lars Schwabe;Sergiu Dalm;Hartmut Schächinger;Melly S. Oitzl

Frequent Co-Authors

E. Ronald de Kloet
E. Ronald de Kloet Leiden University Medical Center
Hartmut Schächinger
Hartmut Schächinger University of Trier
Marian Joëls
Marian Joëls University of Groningen
Onno C. Meijer
Onno C. Meijer Leiden University Medical Center
Mathias V. Schmidt
Mathias V. Schmidt Max Planck Society
Lars Schwabe
Lars Schwabe Universität Hamburg
Harm J. Krugers
Harm J. Krugers University of Amsterdam
Terry D. Blumenthal
Terry D. Blumenthal Wake Forest University
Marianne B. Müller
Marianne B. Müller Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Guillén Fernández
Guillén Fernández Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying neuroscience but want to explore alternative or complementary career paths, several related online degree options are available. A popular starting point is a bachelors in psychology online. This degree offers foundational knowledge that overlaps with neuroscience and can open doors to various roles in mental health, research, or human services.

For those drawn to clinical practice or social work, an msw online program (Master of Social Work) is an accessible route for supporting individuals and communities. Mental health professionals may also pursue doctoral studies through the online psyd pathway, focusing on clinical psychology and direct patient care.

Another in-demand specialization is marriage and family therapy, which you can prepare for through an mft program (Marriage and Family Therapy). These online degrees allow for flexible study, making it easier to transition between neuroscience and related fields or to deepen your expertise in evidence-based practice.

Best Scientists Citing Melly S. Oitzl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles