World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
12574
World Ranking
8659
National Ranking
3675

Ania K. Majewska publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ania K. Majewska sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 128 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ania K. Majewska D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ania K. Majewska sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ania K. Majewska is affiliated with the University of Rochester in the United States. Their primary fields of study are Neuroscience and Medicine, with significant contributions also within several subfields including Neurology, Immunology, Physiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Molecular Biology.

The research topics Majewska has focused on include:

  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Among the frequent publication venues for Majewska's work are:

  • European Journal of Neuroscience
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Majewska include:

  • Linh Le
  • M. Kerry O'Banion
  • Matthew N. McCall
  • Rebecca L. Lowery
  • Cassandra E. Lamantia

The following recent papers illustrate some of Majewska's scholarly output:

  • Microglia states and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads, 2022, Neuron
  • The role of P2Y12 in the kinetics of microglial self-renewal and maturation in the adult visual cortex in vivo, 2021, eLife
  • Little cells of the little brain: microglia in cerebellar development and function, 2021, Trends in Neurosciences
  • Defining Microglial States and Nomenclature: A Roadmap to 2030, 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Movers and shakers: Microglial dynamics and modulation of neural networks, 2022, Glia

Best Publications

  • Microglia states and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads

    Unknown

  • Microglial interactions with synapses are modulated by visual experience.

    Marie-Ève Tremblay;Rebecca L. Lowery;Ania K. Majewska

  • Next-Generation Optical Technologies for Illuminating Genetically Targeted Brain Circuits

    Karl Deisseroth;Guoping Feng;Ania K. Majewska;Gero Miesenböck

  • Microglial P2Y12 is necessary for synaptic plasticity in mouse visual cortex.

    Grayson O. Sipe;Rebecca L. Lowery;Marie-Ève Tremblay;Emily A. Kelly

  • Developmental regulation of spine motility in the mammalian central nervous system

    Anna Dunaevsky;Ayumu Tashiro;Ania Majewska;Carol Ann Mason

  • From form to function: calcium compartmentalization in dendritic spines.

    Rafael Yuste;Ania Majewska;Knut Holthoff

  • Detecting Action Potentials in Neuronal Populations with Calcium Imaging

    Diana Smetters;Ania Majewska;Rafael Yuste

  • Mechanisms of Calcium Influx into Hippocampal Spines: Heterogeneity among Spines, Coincidence Detection by NMDA Receptors, and Optical Quantal Analysis

    Rafael Yuste;Ania Majewska;Sydney S. Cash;Winfried Denk

  • Effects of aging and sensory loss on glial cells in mouse visual and auditory cortices.

    Marie-Ève Tremblay;Martha L. Zettel;James R. Ison;Paul D. Allen

  • Dendritic spine dynamics are regulated by monocular deprivation and extracellular matrix degradation.

    Serkan Oray;Ania Majewska;Mriganka Sur

  • Noradrenergic signaling in the wakeful state inhibits microglial surveillance and synaptic plasticity in the mouse visual cortex.

    Rianne D. Stowell;Grayson O. Sipe;Ryan P. Dawes;Hanna N. Batchelor

  • Remodeling of Synaptic Structure in Sensory Cortical Areas In Vivo

    Ania K Majewska;Jessica R Newton;Mriganka Sur

  • Mechanisms of Calcium Decay Kinetics in Hippocampal Spines: Role of Spine Calcium Pumps and Calcium Diffusion through the Spine Neck in Biochemical Compartmentalization

    Ania Majewska;Edward Brown;Jonathan Ross;Rafael Yuste

  • Dendritic Spine Geometry: Functional Implication and Regulation

    Yasunori Hayashi;Ania K. Majewska

  • In vivo two-photon imaging reveals a role of arc in enhancing orientation specificity in visual cortex

    Kuan Hong Wang;Ania Majewska;Ania Majewska;James Schummers;James Schummers;Brandon Farley;Brandon Farley

  • Motility of dendritic spines in visual cortex in vivo: changes during the critical period and effects of visual deprivation.

    Ania Majewska;Mriganka Sur

  • Regulation of Spine Calcium Dynamics by Rapid Spine Motility

    Ania Majewska;Ayumu Tashiro;Rafael Yuste

  • A role for microglia in synaptic plasticity

    Marie-Ève Tremblay;Ania K Majewska

  • Reduction of neurovascular damage resulting from microelectrode insertion into the cerebral cortex using in vivo two-photon mapping.

    T D Y Kozai;T C Marzullo;F Hooi;N B Langhals

  • A custom-made two-photon microscope and deconvolution system.

    Ania Majewska;Glen Yiu;Rafael Yuste

  • Reduction of neurovascular damage resulting from microelectrode insertion into the cerebral cortex using

    T. D. Y. Kozai;T. C. Marzullo;F. Hooi;N. B. Langhals

Frequent Co-Authors

Rafael Yuste
Rafael Yuste Columbia University
Marie-Ève Tremblay
Marie-Ève Tremblay University of Victoria
Jean M. Bidlack
Jean M. Bidlack University of Rochester
Sydney S. Cash
Sydney S. Cash Harvard University
Alexei Verkhratsky
Alexei Verkhratsky University of Manchester
Karl Deisseroth
Karl Deisseroth Stanford University
Carl G. Gahmberg
Carl G. Gahmberg University of Helsinki
Harris A. Gelbard
Harris A. Gelbard University of Rochester Medical Center
James R. Ison
James R. Ison University of Rochester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to several related fields and career options. Those interested in applying neuroscience in healthcare and counseling might consider pursuing one of the affordable msw programs online. Social work degrees can complement neuroscience knowledge, enabling graduates to better support individuals with neurological or mental health challenges.

For those seeking roles in behavior analysis, obtaining a bcba certification online can be a strategic move. Board Certified Behavior Analysts work with individuals diagnosed with autism and other developmental disorders, often collaborating with neuroscientists and psychologists.

Individuals looking for flexible and swift educational opportunities can explore online msw programs that are accelerated and structured for working professionals. Similarly, if your interest leans more toward human cognition and psychology, an accelerated psychology degree can help you enter the workforce quickly without compromising on academic rigor.

These diverse online degree pathways offer accessible and affordable ways to advance your education and career in areas closely tied to neuroscience, making it easier than ever to tailor your studies to your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ania K. Majewska

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles