World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
18607
World Ranking
7275
National Ranking
608

Olga Garaschuk publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olga Garaschuk sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 113 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Olga Garaschuk D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olga Garaschuk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Olga Garaschuk is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and medicine, with a substantial number of publications in related subfields such as neurology, physiology, molecular biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and sensory systems.

The main topics investigated by Garaschuk include:

  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Biochemical effects in animals

Garaschuk's frequent coauthors consist of Nima Mojtahedi, Yury Kovalchuk, Katherine Figarella, Volodymyr I. Lushchak, and Maria M. Bayliak, who have collaborated multiple times on various research projects.

The most common venues for publishing research by this scientist include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neural Regeneration Research
  • Cell Calcium
  • Nature
  • Frontiers in Immunology

Key recent papers authored or coauthored by Olga Garaschuk encompass the following:

  • Autonomous rhythmic activity in glioma networks drives brain tumour growth, 2022, Nature
  • Oxidative Stress and Energy Metabolism in the Brain: Midlife as a Turning Point, 2021, Antioxidants
  • Effect of Caloric Restriction on the in vivo Functional Properties of Aging Microglia, 2020, Frontiers in Immunology
  • Cell motility and migration as determinants of stem cell efficacy, 2020, EBioMedicine
  • Middle age as a turning point in mouse cerebral cortex energy and redox metabolism: Modulation by every-other-day fasting, 2020, Experimental Gerontology

Olga Garaschuk was inducted as a Member of Academia Europaea in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease

    Michael T Heneka;Monica J Carson;Joseph El Khoury;Gary E Landreth

  • In vivo two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal networks

    Christoph Stosiek;Olga Garaschuk;Knut Holthoff;Arthur Konnerth

  • Clusters of hyperactive neurons near amyloid plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Marc Aurel Busche;Gerhard Eichhoff;Gerhard Eichhoff;Helmuth Adelsberger;Helmuth Adelsberger;Dorothee Abramowski

  • Brain tumour cells interconnect to a functional and resistant network

    Matthias Osswald;Matthias Osswald;Erik Jung;Erik Jung;Felix Sahm;Felix Sahm;Gergely Solecki;Gergely Solecki

  • Coupled Proliferation and Apoptosis Maintain the Rapid Turnover of Microglia in the Adult Brain

    Katharine Askew;Kaizhen Li;Adrian Olmos-Alonso;Fernando Garcia-Moreno

  • Large-scale oscillatory calcium waves in the immature cortex.

    Olga Garaschuk;Jennifer Linn;Jens Eilers;Jens Eilers;Arthur Konnerth;Arthur Konnerth

  • Ataxia and altered dendritic calcium signaling in mice carrying a targeted null mutation of the calbindin D28k gene

    Matti S. Airaksinen;Jens Eilers;Olga Garaschuk;Hans Thoenen

  • Optimized ratiometric calcium sensors for functional in vivo imaging of neurons and T lymphocytes

    Thomas Thestrup;Julia Litzlbauer;Ingo Bartholomäus;Marsilius Mues

  • Developmental profile and synaptic origin of early network oscillations in the CA1 region of rat neonatal hippocampus

    Olga Garaschuk;Eric Hanse;Arthur Konnerth

  • Cortical calcium waves in resting newborn mice

    Helmuth Adelsberger;Olga Garaschuk;Arthur Konnerth

  • Sparsification of neuronal activity in the visual cortex at eye-opening

    Nathalie L. Rochefort;Olga Garaschuk;Ruxandra-Iulia Milos;Madoka Narushima

  • Targeted bulk-loading of fluorescent indicators for two-photon brain imaging in vivo

    Olga Garaschuk;Ruxandra-Iulia Milos;Arthur Konnerth

  • Microglial repopulation model reveals a robust homeostatic process for replacing CNS myeloid cells

    Nicholas H. Varvel;Nicholas H. Varvel;Stefan A. Grathwohl;Stefan A. Grathwohl;Frank Baumann;Frank Baumann;Christian Liebig;Christian Liebig

  • Autonomous rhythmic activity in glioma networks drives brain tumour growth

    Unknown

  • Release and sequestration of calcium by ryanodine-sensitive stores in rat hippocampal neurones.

    Olga Garaschuk;Yoel Yaari;Arthur Konnerth

  • GABA depolarizes immature neurons and inhibits network activity in the neonatal neocortex in vivo

    Knut Kirmse;Michael Kummer;Yury Kovalchuk;Otto W. Witte

  • Improved calcium imaging in transgenic mice expressing a troponin C-based biosensor.

    Nicola Heim;Olga Garaschuk;Michael W Friedrich;Marco Mank

  • Microglial calcium signal acts as a rapid sensor of single neuron damage in vivo.

    Gerhard Eichhoff;Bianca Brawek;Olga Garaschuk

  • Ryanodine receptor-mediated intracellular calcium release in rat cerebellar Purkinje neurones

    M Kano;O Garaschuk;A Verkhratsky;A Konnerth

  • Wide-field and two-photon imaging of brain activity with voltage- and calcium-sensitive dyes

    Ryota Homma;Bradley J. Baker;Lei Jin;Olga Garaschuk

  • Neuroinfl ammation in Alzheimer's disease

    Michael T Heneka;Monica J Carson;Joseph El Khoury;Gary E Landreth

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur Konnerth
Arthur Konnerth Technical University of Munich
Alexei Verkhratsky
Alexei Verkhratsky University of Manchester
Volodymyr I. Lushchak
Volodymyr I. Lushchak Carleton University
Oleg Krishtal
Oleg Krishtal National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Jens Eilers
Jens Eilers Leipzig University
Kenneth B. Storey
Kenneth B. Storey Carleton University
Tony Wyss-Coray
Tony Wyss-Coray Stanford University
Michael T. Heneka
Michael T. Heneka University Hospital Bonn
Richard M. Ransohoff
Richard M. Ransohoff Harvard University
Clive Holmes
Clive Holmes University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in neuroscience opens doors to a variety of career pathways, especially in fields related to mental health, psychology, and counseling. If you're considering online options, it's important to choose programs that are both reputable and affordable.

For those interested in counseling, pursuing a cacrep online masters in counseling ensures that your education meets the standards set by the industry’s key accreditation body. This can provide an advantage in job markets and licensure requirements.

Finding the cheapest mental health counseling degree can help you start a career helping others without overwhelming debt. If you’re interested in working with couples or families, consider specialized training through marriage and family masters programs.

Additionally, a masters of psychology online can enhance your understanding of human behavior, making it a versatile choice for research, education, or clinical practice. Choosing the right online degree will help you connect your neuroscience background to numerous professional roles.

Best Scientists Citing Olga Garaschuk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles