World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
29684
World Ranking
17395
National Ranking
1574

C.W. Elston publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C.W. Elston sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 262 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

C.W. Elston D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C.W. Elston sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

C.W. Elston is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile currently shows no recorded recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues.

There is no detailed information available regarding their main fields or subfields of study, nor specific topics they have worked on. Likewise, there are no listed book publications or awards associated with them.

Due to the lack of specific data on their research contributions and publications, a comprehensive overview of their research work is limited to acknowledging their institutional affiliation and the name under which their academic activity is recorded.

Best Publications

  • Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

    C.W. Elston;I.O. Ellis

  • Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer.

    Christopher W. Elston;Ian O. Ellis;Sarah E. Pinder

  • A prognostic index in primary breast cancer.

    J L Haybittle;R W Blamey;C W Elston;J Johnson

  • Prognostic Significance of Nottingham Histologic Grade in Invasive Breast Carcinoma

    Emad A. Rakha;Maysa E. El-Sayed;Andrew H. S. Lee;Christopher W. Elston

  • Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long-term follow-up

    I.O. Ellis;M. Galea;N. Broughton;A. Locker

  • Histological grading of breast carcinomas: A study of interobserver agreement

    P Robbins;P Robbins;S Pinder;S Pinder;N de Klerk;N de Klerk;H Dawkins;H Dawkins

  • Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. C. W. Elston & I. O. Ellis. Histopathology 1991; 19; 403-410.

    C W Elston;I O Ellis

  • Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. III. Vascular invasion: relationship with recurrence and survival in a large study with long‐term follow‐up

    S.E. Pinder;I.O. Ellis;M. Galea;S. O'rouke

  • Ki67 immunostaining in primary breast cancer: pathological and clinical associations.

    N. Bouzubar;K. J. Walker;K. Griffiths;I. O. Ellis

  • c-erbB-2 oncoprotein expression in primary and advanced breast cancer

    C. Lovekin;I. O. Ellis;A. Locker;J. F. R. Robertson

  • Phyllodes tumours of the breast: a clinicopathological review of thirty-two cases.

    C.J.C. Moffat;S.E. Pinder;A.R. Dixon;C.W. Elston

  • Survival of invasive breast cancer according to the Nottingham Prognostic Index in cases diagnosed in 1990-1999.

    R W Blamey;I O Ellis;Sarah Pinder;Andrew Lee

  • Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors.

    H. C. Burrell;D. M. Sibbering;A. R. M. Wilson;S. E. Pinder

  • Pathological work-up of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Review of current data to be considered for the formulation of guidelines

    G. Cserni;I. Amendoeira;N. Apostolikas;J.P. Bellocq

  • Early-onset breast cancer--histopathological and prognostic considerations.

    J. Kollias;C. W. Elston;I. O. Ellis;J. F. R. Robertson

  • Assessment of the new proliferation marker MIB1 in breast carcinoma using image analysis: associations with other prognostic factors and survival

    S. E. Pinder;P. Wencyk;D. M. Sibbering;J. A. Bell

  • A New Immunohistochemical Antibody for the Assessment of Estrogen Receptor Status on Routine Formalin-Fixed Tissue Samples

    H Goulding;H Goulding;S Pinder;S Pinder;P Cannon;P Cannon;D Pearson;D Pearson

  • Discrepancies in current practice of pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Results of a questionnaire based survey by the European Working Group for Breast Screening Pathology.

    G Cserni;I Amendoeira;N Apostolikas;J P Bellocq

  • Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. IV: Should you be a typer or a grader? A comparative study of two histological prognostic features in operable breast carcinoma

    H. Pereira;S.E. Pinder;D.M. Sibbering;M.H. Galea

  • Factors influencing local recurrence after excision and radiotherapy for primary breast cancer.

    A. P. Locker;I. O. Ellis;D. A. L. Morgan;C. W. Elston

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian O. Ellis
Ian O. Ellis University of Nottingham
Roger W. Blamey
Roger W. Blamey Nottingham City Hospital
Sarah E Pinder
Sarah E Pinder King's College London
Andrew Evans
Andrew Evans University of Dundee
John F.R. Robertson
John F.R. Robertson University of Nottingham
Robert Ian Nicholson
Robert Ian Nicholson Cardiff University
Jocelyne Jacquemier
Jocelyne Jacquemier Grenoble Alpes University
Johannes L. Peterse
Johannes L. Peterse Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Robert W. Baldwin
Robert W. Baldwin University of Nottingham
Anna Sapino
Anna Sapino University of Turin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online medical and nursing programs is a flexible option for those considering studying Medicine in the USA. For registered nurses looking to further their education, online rn to bsn programs no clinicals are increasingly popular, offering an accelerated route without requiring in-person clinical rotations.

Advanced practice nurses may benefit from online doctoral options. For example, a 1 year dnp program online enables working professionals to advance their skills quickly. Similar options are available for those seeking the easiest dnp programs, which focus on streamlined paths to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree.

For those interested in starting their healthcare careers sooner, an accelerated lpn program can help you enter the workforce quickly as a Licensed Practical Nurse. These fast-track and flexible programs allow you to study at your own pace and can adapt to busy schedules or current professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing C.W. Elston

Trending Scientists