World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8063 7525 4319 3929 114 12100

Kevin S. McGrew publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kevin S. McGrew between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kevin S. McGrew published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1995. 1 of the 129 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1995. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1983 2025

129 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kevin S. McGrew: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 2
1987 4
1988 3
1989 3
1990 2
1991 4
1992 7
1993 6
1994 8
1995 10
1996 5
1997 7
1998 3
1999 1
2000 3
2001 0
2002 3
2003 3
2004 5
2005 4
2006 0
2007 3
2008 3
2009 4
2010 6
2011 2
2012 2
2013 0
2014 3
2015 2
2016 3
2017 2
2018 1
2019 2
2020 1
2021 3
2022 1
2023 3
2024 0
2025 1
Total 129
Download as CSV

Kevin S. McGrew publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin S. McGrew sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 114
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kevin S. McGrew D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin S. McGrew sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kevin S. McGrew is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and focuses primarily on psychology research. Their scholarly work spans a variety of subfields that include experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, artificial intelligence, and management science and operations research.

The main topics covered in their research emphasize cognitive abilities and testing, educational and psychological assessments, mental health research topics, functional brain connectivity studies, cognitive science and mapping, psychometric methodologies and testing, and the intersection of neuroscience, education, and cognitive function.

Frequent co-authors in Kevin S. McGrew's publications include W. Joel Schneider, Okan Bulut, Scott L. Decker, Damien C. Cormier, and Kathleen Kennedy.

The scientist has contributed multiple articles to various publication venues with a notable concentration in the Journal of Intelligence. Other publication outlets include the Canadian Journal of School Psychology, Intellectual and developmental disabilities, and arXiv (Cornell University).

  • A Psychometric Network Analysis of CHC Intelligence Measures: Implications for Research, Theory, and Interpretation of Broad CHC Scores "Beyond g" (2023, Journal of Intelligence)
  • Carroll's Three-Stratum (3S) Cognitive Ability Theory at 30 Years: Impact, 3S-CHC Theory Clarification, Structural Replication, and Cognitive-Achievement Psychometric Network Analysis Extension (2023, Journal of Intelligence)
  • Linguistic Influences on Cognitive Test Performance: Examinee Characteristics Are More Important than Test Characteristics (2022, Journal of Intelligence)
  • The Cognitive-Affective-Motivation Model of Learning (CAMML): Standing on the Shoulders of Giants (2021, Canadian Journal of School Psychology)
  • Is the Intellectual Functioning Component of AAIDD's 12th Manual Satisficing? (2021, Intellectual and developmental disabilities)

Best Publications

  • CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research

    Kevin S. McGrew

  • The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence.

    W. Joel Schneider;Kevin S. McGrew

  • The Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory of Cognitive Abilities: Past, Present, and Future.

    Kevin S. McGrew

  • The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR) : Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment

    Kevin S. McGrew;Dawn P. Flanagan

  • Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework.

    Kevin S. McGrew

  • Woodcock-Johnson tests of achievement.

    RW Woodcock;KS McGrew;N Mather;IL Meadows

  • The Wechsler Intelligence Scales and Gf-Gc Theory: A Contemporary Approach to Interpretation

    Dawn P. Flanagan;Kevin S. McGrew;Samuel O. Ortiz

  • Relations between measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and mathematics achievement across the school-age years

    Randy G. Floyd;Jeffrey J. Evans;Kevin S. McGREW

  • The Relations Between Measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) Cognitive Abilities and Reading Achievement During Childhood and Adolescence

    Jeffrey J. Evans;Randy G. Floyd;Kevin S. McGrew;Maria H. Leforgee

  • Cattell–Horn–Carroll cognitive-achievement relations: What we have learned from the past 20 years of research

    Kevin S. McGrew;Barbara J. Wendling

  • Critical Issues in Response-To-Intervention, Comprehensive Evaluation, and Specific Learning Disabilities Identification and Intervention: An Expert White Paper Consensus

    J. Hale;V. Alfonso;V. Berninger;B. Bracken

  • Effects of general and broad cognitive abilities on mathematics achievement.

    Gordon E. Taub;Timothy Z. Keith;Randy G. Floyd;Kevin S. Mcgrew

  • Beyond g: The Impact of Gf-Gc Specific Cognitive Abilities Research on the Future Use and Interpretation of Intelligence Tests in the Schools

    Kevin S. McGrew;Dawn P. Flanagan;Timothy Z. Keith;Mike Vanderwood

  • The Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory of cognitive abilities.

    W. Joel Schneider;Kevin S. McGrew

  • Are cognitive g and academic achievement g one and the same g? An exploration on the Woodcock–Johnson and Kaufman tests

    Scott Barry Kaufman;Matthew R. Reynolds;Xin Liu;Alan S. Kaufman

  • Batería III Woodcock-Muñoz

    A. F. Muñoz-Sandoval;R. W. Woodcock;K. S. McGrew;N. Mather

  • A cross-battery approach to assessing and interpreting cognitive abilities: Narrowing the gap between practice and cognitive science.

    Dawn P. Flanagan;Kevin S. McGrew

  • Introduction to the special issue: Current research in Cattell–Horn–Carroll–based assessment

    Jocelyn H. Newton;Kevin S. McGrew

  • Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive abilities and their effects on reading decoding skills: g has indirect effects, more specific abilities have direct effects.

    Randy G. Floyd;Timothy Z. Keith;Gordon E. Taub;Kevin S. McGrew

  • The Relationship between the WJ-R Gf-Gc Cognitive Clusters and Mathematics Achievement across the Life-Span:

    Kevin S. McGrew;Gary L. Hessler

Frequent Co-Authors

Martha L. Thurlow
Martha L. Thurlow University of Minnesota
James E. Ysseldyke
James E. Ysseldyke University of Minnesota
Randy G. Floyd
Randy G. Floyd University of Memphis
Dawn P. Flanagan
Dawn P. Flanagan St. John's University
Timothy Z. Keith
Timothy Z. Keith The University of Texas at Austin
Alan S. Kaufman
Alan S. Kaufman University of Connecticut
Bob Algozzine
Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Matthew R. Reynolds
Matthew R. Reynolds Tufts University
Scott Barry Kaufman
Scott Barry Kaufman Columbia University
Cynthia A. Riccio
Cynthia A. Riccio Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a range of fulfilling careers—many of which are accessible through online study. A popular pathway is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a role that requires a specialized graduate degree and state licensure.

Prospective students should be aware that requirements vary by location. For example, if you want to learn how to become an mft in Fort Wayne, you will need to research specific educational standards and licensing steps. The process for how to become a marriage and family therapist in Fort Worth includes a supervised clinical experience unique to Texas.

Similarly, there are Fremont mft certification requirements that differ from those in California's Central Valley, where aspiring therapists must meet mft requirements in Fresno. Many accredited universities offer online psychology degrees, allowing for flexibility as you prepare for state-specific exams and supervised practice.

With demand for mental health professionals on the rise, online psychology programs provide a strong foundation for various career paths in counseling, therapy, and social services across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin S. McGrew

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles