World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Dawn P. Flanagan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dawn P. Flanagan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Dawn P. Flanagan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dawn P. Flanagan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2000 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Dawn P. Flanagan is affiliated with St. John's University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and mathematics, with a specialized focus on developmental and educational psychology, statistics and probability, education, and psychiatry and mental health.

The primary research topics addressed include:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • School Choice and Performance
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Higher Education Learning Practices

Flanagan's recent published work consists of several papers between 2021 and 2025, including:

  • "The effect of measurement error on the positive predictive value of PSW methods for SLD identification: How buffer zones dispel the illusion of inaccuracy" (2024) in the Journal of School Psychology
  • "Helping School Psychologists and Districts Estimate the Cost of Adopting the Dual Discrepancy/Consistency PSW Method for SLD Identification" (2021) in the Journal of Applied School Psychology
  • "Toward a Consensus Model of Cognitive-Reading Achievement Relations Using Meta-Structural Equation Modeling" (2025) in the Journal of Intelligence
  • "The Woodcock-Johnson V: Fifty Years of Excellence in Ability Assessment" (2025) in the Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
  • "Overview of the Woodcock-Johnson V Tests of Cognitive Abilities and Virtual Test Library" (2025) in the Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Flanagan include:

  • W. Joel Schneider
  • Christopher R. Niileksela
  • Vincent C. Alfonso
  • Joseph R. Engler
  • Andrew Shanock

Publication activity is chiefly concentrated in journals such as:

  • Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
  • Journal of School Psychology
  • Journal of Applied School Psychology
  • Journal of Intelligence

In 2000, Flanagan was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • Essentials of Cross-Battery Assessment

    Dawn P. Flanagan;Samuel O. Ortiz;Vincent C. Alfonso

  • The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR) : Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment

    Kevin S. McGrew;Dawn P. Flanagan

  • Contemporary intellectual assessment : theories, tests, and issues

    Dawn P. Flanagan;Patti L. Harrison

  • The Wechsler Intelligence Scales and Gf-Gc Theory: A Contemporary Approach to Interpretation

    Dawn P. Flanagan;Kevin S. McGrew;Samuel O. Ortiz

  • The Impact of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory on Test Development and Interpretation of Cognitive and Academic Abilities.

    Vincent C. Alfonso;Dawn P. Flanagan;Suzan Radwan

  • Critical Issues in Response-To-Intervention, Comprehensive Evaluation, and Specific Learning Disabilities Identification and Intervention: An Expert White Paper Consensus

    J. Hale;V. Alfonso;V. Berninger;B. Bracken

  • Beyond g: The Impact of Gf-Gc Specific Cognitive Abilities Research on the Future Use and Interpretation of Intelligence Tests in the Schools

    Kevin S. McGrew;Dawn P. Flanagan;Timothy Z. Keith;Mike Vanderwood

  • A cross-battery approach to assessing and interpreting cognitive abilities: Narrowing the gap between practice and cognitive science.

    Dawn P. Flanagan;Kevin S. McGrew

  • Essentials of Specific Learning Disability Identification

    Dawn P. Flanagan;Vincent C. Alfonso

  • Test Review: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV)

    Alan S. Kaufman;Dawn P. Flanagan;Vincent C. Alfonso;Jennifer T. Mascolo

  • Convergent validity of the BASC and SSRS: Implications for social skills assessment

    Dawn P. Flanagan;Vincent C. Alfonso;Louis H. Primavera;Laura Povall

  • ENHANCING PRACTICE THROUGH APPLICATION OF CATTELL-HORN-CARROLL THEORY AND RESEARCH: A "THIRD METHOD" APPROACH TO SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY IDENTIFICATION

    Dawn P. Flanagan;Catherine A. Fiorello;Samuel O. Ortiz

  • Best Practices in Working With Culturally Diverse Children and Families.

    Samuel O. Ortiz;Dawn P. Flanagan

  • Integration of response to intervention and norm‐referenced tests in learning disability identification: Learning from the Tower of Babel

    Dawn P. Flanagan;Samuel O. Ortiz;Vincent C. Alfonso;Agnieszka M. Dynda

  • A Critical Review of the Technical Characteristics of New and Recently Revised Intelligence Tests for Preschool Children

    Dawn P. Flanagan;Vincent C. Alfonso

  • The contribution of general and specific cognitive abilities to reading achievement

    Michael L Vanderwood;Kevin S McGrew;Dawn P Flanagan;Timothy Z Keith

  • Essentials of cross-battery assessment, 2nd ed.

    Dawn P. Flanagan;Samuel O. Ortiz;Vincent C. Alfonso

  • Interpreting Intelligence Tests from Contemporary Gf-Gc Theory: Joint Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the WJ-R and KAIT in a Non-White Sample

    Dawn P. Flanagan;Kevin S. McGrew

  • PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE ISSUES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING FOR EDUCATIONAL APPLICATIONS

    Scott L. Decker;James B. Hale;Dawn P. Flanagan

  • The Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory of Cognitive Abilities

    Dawn P. Flanagan;Shauna G. Dixon

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin S. McGrew
Kevin S. McGrew University of Minnesota
Timothy Z. Keith
Timothy Z. Keith The University of Texas at Austin
Alan S. Kaufman
Alan S. Kaufman University of Connecticut
John H. Kranzler
John H. Kranzler University of Florida
Jack A. Naglieri
Jack A. Naglieri University of Virginia
William F. Chaplin
William F. Chaplin St. John's University
Linda A. Reddy
Linda A. Reddy Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Ron Dumont
Ron Dumont Fairleigh Dickinson University
Cynthia A. Riccio
Cynthia A. Riccio Texas A&M University
John O. Willis
John O. Willis Rivier University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens up diverse academic options and career opportunities across the USA. As demand for qualified mental health professionals continues to rise, top psychology programs are adapting with flexible online degrees and specialized tracks.

When selecting an online psychology degree, it is important to evaluate institutional reputation, accreditation, curriculum focus, and available career services. Comparing top psychology degrees in USA offers a nationwide perspective on schools with high-quality faculty and research opportunities.

Many students also look for strong regional programs, such as the best psychology degree programs ranking in South Dakota, the best psychology program rankings in Shreveport, or the top psychology degrees in Virginia. These programs offer close-knit communities and often have strong ties with local employers, which can be an advantage for internships and job placement.

Earning an online psychology degree can prepare you for a wide range of careers—from counseling and social work to human resources, research, and beyond. Exploring accredited programs and their career pathways is a valuable first step toward your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Dawn P. Flanagan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles