World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
4423
World Ranking
8977
National Ranking
4755

Gary L. Canivez publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary L. Canivez sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gary L. Canivez D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary L. Canivez sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Gary L. Canivez is affiliated with Eastern Illinois University in the United States. Their research activity primarily spans the field of psychology, with a focus on developmental and educational psychology as well as experimental and cognitive psychology. Other notable subfields include management science and operations research, clinical psychology, and social psychology.

Key topics in Canivez's work encompass cognitive abilities and testing, educational and psychological assessments, and psychometric methodologies and testing. Their research also addresses child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, behavioral and psychological studies, counseling practices and supervision, and early childhood education and development.

Their recent published papers demonstrate engagement with themes relevant to diversity, assessment practices, and the reliability of cognitive testing instruments. Notable recent papers include:

  • Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in School Psychology: Be the Change (2021), published in School Psychology Review
  • Beyond the Rhetoric of Evidence-Based Assessment: A Framework for Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice (2021), published in School Psychology Review
  • Long-term Stability of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition Scores in a Clinical Sample (2021), published in Applied Neuropsychology Child
  • Why Questionable Assessment Practices Remain Popular in School Psychology: Instructional Materials as Pedagogic Vehicles (2020), published in Canadian Journal of School Psychology
  • Use of Translated and Adapted Versions of the WISC-V: Caveat Emptor (2020), published in School Psychology International

Gary L. Canivez frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Ryan J. McGill, Stefan C. Dombrowski, Marley W. Watkins, Alison E. Pritchard, and Lisa A. Jacobson. These collaborative efforts are reflected in multiple publications across their shared areas of interest.

Their work has been published repeatedly in key venues, such as PsycEXTRA Dataset, School Psychology Review, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Canadian Journal of School Psychology, and School Psychology International. These publication venues represent outlets specialized in psychological research and school psychology.

In recognition of their contributions, Gary L. Canivez was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Psychometric Intelligence and Achievement: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis.

    Marley W. Watkins;Pui Wa Lei;Gary L. Canivez

  • Long-Term Stability of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Third Edition

    Gary L. Canivez;Marley W. Watkins

  • Investigation of the factor structure of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV): exploratory and higher order factor analyses.

    Gary L. Canivez;Marley W. Watkins

  • Construct Validity of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence and Wide Range Intelligence Test: Convergent and Structural Validity

    Gary L. Canivez;Timothy R. Konold;Jason M. Collins;Greg Wilson

  • Factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: Exploratory factor analyses with the 16 primary and secondary subtests.

    Gary L. Canivez;Marley W. Watkins;Stefan C. Dombrowski

  • Structural validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: Confirmatory factor analyses with the 16 primary and secondary subtests.

    Gary L. Canivez;Marley W. Watkins;Stefan C. Dombrowski

  • Construct validity of the WISC-IV with a referred sample: Direct versus indirect hierarchical structures.

    Gary L. Canivez

  • Structural and Incremental Validity of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition With a Clinical Sample

    Jason M. Nelson;Gary L. Canivez;Marley W. Watkins

  • Psychometric Versus Actuarial Interpretation of Intelligence and Related Aptitude Batteries

    Gary L. Canivez

  • Exploratory bifactor analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fifth Edition with the 16 primary and secondary subtests

    Stefan C. Dombrowski;Gary L. Canivez;Marley W. Watkins;A. Alexander Beaujean

  • Significant Factor Score Variability and the Validity of the WISC-III Full Scale IQ in Predicting Later Academic Achievement

    Miranda E. Freberg;Beverly J. Vandiver;Marley W. Watkins;Gary L. Canivez

  • Orthogonal Higher Order Factor Structure of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales--Fifth Edition for Children and Adolescents.

    Gary L. Canivez

  • WAIS-IV and WISC-IV Structural Validity: Alternate Methods, Alternate Results. Commentary on Weiss et al. (2013a) and Weiss et al. (2013b).

    Gary L. Canivez;Joseph C. Kush

  • Temporal stability of WISC-III subtest composite: strengths and weaknesses.

    Marley W. Watkins;Gary L. Canivez

  • Exploratory and hierarchical factor analysis of the WJ-IV Cognitive at school age.

    Stefan C. Dombrowski;Ryan J. McGill;Gary L. Canivez

  • Higher-order exploratory factor analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales with a referred sample

    Jason M. Nelson;Gary L. Canivez;Will Lindstrom;Clifford V. Hatt

  • Exploratory and higher-order factor analyses of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) adolescent subsample.

    Gary L. Canivez;Marley W. Watkins

  • Cognitive profile analysis in school psychology: History, issues, and continued concerns

    Ryan J. McGill;Stefan C. Dombrowski;Gary L. Canivez

  • Examination of the Structural, Convergent, and Incremental Validity of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) with a Clinical Sample.

    Jason M. Nelson;Gary L. Canivez

  • Construct Validity of the WISC-III for White and Black Students from the WISC-III Standardization Sample and for Black Students Referred for Psychological Evaluation.

    Joseph C. Kush;Marley W. Watkins;Thomas J. Ward;Sandra B. Ward

Frequent Co-Authors

Marley W. Watkins
Marley W. Watkins Baylor University
Timothy R. Konold
Timothy R. Konold University of Virginia
Frank C. Worrell
Frank C. Worrell University of California, Berkeley
John H. Kranzler
John H. Kranzler University of Florida
Tyler L. Renshaw
Tyler L. Renshaw Utah State University
Jelena Obradović
Jelena Obradović Stanford University
Cixin Wang
Cixin Wang University of Maryland, College Park
Francis L. Huang
Francis L. Huang University of Missouri
Nathaniel P. von der Embse
Nathaniel P. von der Embse University of South Florida
Dorothy L. Espelage
Dorothy L. Espelage University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to many related online programs and exciting career options. One increasingly popular pathway is Speech-Language Pathology (SLP), where professionals help individuals overcome communication and swallowing disorders. This field offers both flexibility and high demand, making it appealing to psychology graduates seeking a practical, client-focused profession.

The requirements for becoming a speech pathologist vary by state. For instance, those interested in working in South Carolina should review the South Carolina speech pathologist certification requirements to understand necessary educational and licensing criteria. Similarly, individuals considering becoming a speech therapist in South Dakota or exploring opportunities in Tennessee should look into how to become a speech language pathologist in Tennessee to compare processes and standards.

Aspiring professionals in Texas should familiarize themselves with slp requirements in Texas, as state-specific education and supervised clinical experience are often mandatory. No matter the pathway, online degree programs make it easier than ever to complete foundational coursework and move toward a rewarding career in psychology-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Gary L. Canivez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles