World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8303 7756 4432 4037 95 5835

Francis L. Huang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Francis L. Huang between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Francis L. Huang published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2021. 20 of the 131 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2021. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 13 publications
2008 2025

131 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Francis L. Huang: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 2
2010 2
2011 1
2012 4
2013 5
2014 13
2015 8
2016 7
2017 10
2018 12
2019 8
2020 6
2021 14
2022 11
2023 7
2024 7
2025 13
Total 131
Download as CSV

Francis L. Huang publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francis L. Huang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 95
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Francis L. Huang D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francis L. Huang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Francis L. Huang is affiliated with the University of Missouri in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a significant focus on education, social psychology, and statistical methods in behavioral studies.

The scientist's work addresses various subfields including education, social psychology, statistics and probability, clinical psychology, and developmental and educational psychology. Their main research topics center on education discipline and inequality, bullying, victimization, and aggression, behavioral and psychological studies, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, statistical methods and Bayesian inference, advanced causal inference techniques, and early childhood education and development.

Among recent publications by Francis L. Huang are:

  • Individual and school predictors of teacher stress, coping, and wellness during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2021, School Psychology
  • Analyzing Cross-Sectionally Clustered Data Using Generalized Estimating Equations, 2021, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
  • Does Teacher Emotional Exhaustion and Efficacy Predict Student Discipline Sanctions?, 2020, School Psychology Review
  • The relationship between school disciplinary resolutions with school climate and attitudes toward school, 2020, Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth
  • Teacher Support for Zero Tolerance Is Associated With Higher Suspension Rates and Lower Feelings of Safety, 2021, School Psychology Review

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include:

  • School Psychology Review
  • School Psychology
  • Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth
  • Prevention Science
  • Psychology in the Schools

Francis L. Huang has collaborated often with several co-authors in the field, including:

  • Keith C. Herman
  • Wendy M. Reinke
  • Dewey G. Cornell
  • Bixi Zhang
  • Jennifer L. Maeng

Best Publications

  • Authoritative school discipline: High school practices associated with lower bullying and victimization.

    Anne Gregory;Dewey Cornell;Xitao Fan;Peter Sheras

  • Perceived prevalence of teasing and bullying predicts high school dropout rates.

    Dewey G. Cornell;Anne Gregory;Francis Huang;Xitao Fan

  • Alternatives to Multilevel Modeling for the Analysis of Clustered Data

    Francis L. Huang

  • Is experience the best teacher? A multilevel analysis of teacher characteristics and student achievement in low performing schools

    Francis L. Huang;Tonya R. Moon

  • Authoritative School Climate and High School Student Risk Behavior: A Cross-sectional Multi-level Analysis of Student Self-Reports

    Dewey G. Cornell;Francis Huang

  • Multilevel modeling myths.

    Francis L. Huang

  • An Examination of Restorative Interventions and Racial Equity in Out-of-School Suspensions

    Anne Gregory;Francis L. Huang;Yolanda Anyon;Eldridge Greer

  • Racial/Ethnic Differences in Perceptions of School Climate and Its Association with Student Engagement and Peer Aggression

    Timothy Konold;Dewey Cornell;Kathan Shukla;Francis Huang

  • Multilevel Multi-Informant Structure of the Authoritative School Climate Survey.

    Timothy Konold;Dewey Cornell;Francis Huang;Patrick Meyer

  • Effects of validity screening items on adolescent survey data.

    Dewey Cornell;Jennifer Klein;Tim Konold;Francis Huang

  • It takes a village: the effects of 10th grade college-going expectations of students, parents, and teachers four years later.

    Anne Gregory;Francis Huang

  • School Teasing and Bullying After the Presidential Election

    Francis L. Huang;Dewey G. Cornell

  • The differential effects of preschool: Evidence from Virginia ☆

    Francis L. Huang;Marcia A. Invernizzi;E. Allison Drake

  • Successive teacher expectation effects across the early school years

    Christine M. Rubie-Davies;Rhona S. Weinstein;Francis L. Huang;Anne Gregory

  • Student attitudes and behaviors as explanations for the Black-White suspension gap

    Francis L. Huang;Dewey G. Cornell

  • An investigation of factors associated with letter-sound knowledge at kindergarten entry

    Francis L. Huang;Laura S. Tortorelli;Marcia A. Invernizzi

  • The impact of definition and question order on the prevalence of bullying victimization using student self-reports.

    Francis L. Huang;Dewey G. Cornell

  • Teacher Job Satisfaction by Principal Support and Teacher Cooperation: Results from the Schools and Staffing Survey.

    Amanda A. Olsen;Francis L. Huang

  • Do Black students misbehave more? Investigating the differential involvement hypothesis and out-of-school suspensions

    Francis L. Huang

  • The Association of Kindergarten Entry Age with Early Literacy Outcomes

    Francis L. Huang;Marcia A. Invernizzi

Frequent Co-Authors

Dewey G. Cornell
Dewey G. Cornell University of Virginia
Keith C. Herman
Keith C. Herman University of Missouri
Timothy R. Konold
Timothy R. Konold University of Virginia
Wendy M. Reinke
Wendy M. Reinke University of Missouri
Anne Gregory
Anne Gregory Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Xitao Fan
Xitao Fan Chinese University of Hong Kong
Melissa Stormont
Melissa Stormont University of Missouri
Philip A. Cowan
Philip A. Cowan University of California, Berkeley
Frank C. Worrell
Frank C. Worrell University of California, Berkeley
Dorothy L. Espelage
Dorothy L. Espelage University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online Psychology degree in the USA offers both flexibility and a range of affordable options. Many students look for budget-friendly programs to minimize student debt. For example, you can explore the most affordable online bachelor's in psychology degree programs in New York, which provide accessible pathways for New York residents.

Regional availability of online psychology degrees is a key consideration. If you live in the southern United States, check the most affordable online bachelor's in psychology degree programs in the South for schools that blend affordability and quality.

Certain metropolitan areas also stand out for affordability. The most affordable online bachelor's in psychology degree programs in St. Louis highlight options for students in and around this city.

For those focused on the Southeast, the cheapest online psychology programs in Georgia offer accredited degrees at competitive prices, expanding access to in-demand psychology career pathways.

Online psychology degrees can open doors to careers in counseling, research, human resources, social work, and more. As digital learning options grow, finding an affordable, regionally-relevant program is more possible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Francis L. Huang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles