World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 92 11411 10727 5848 5409 373 27505

Jack Goldberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jack Goldberg between 1963 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jack Goldberg published across 64 years, from 1963 to 2026, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2010. 2 of the 389 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2010. 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 6 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
1963 2026

389 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jack Goldberg: publications per year, 1963 to 2026
Year Publications
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 3
1978 4
1979 0
1980 4
1981 0
1982 1
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 3
1989 1
1990 6
1991 4
1992 3
1993 7
1994 3
1995 4
1996 10
1997 6
1998 9
1999 8
2000 10
2001 12
2002 10
2003 5
2004 14
2005 15
2006 23
2007 13
2008 22
2009 21
2010 24
2011 13
2012 17
2013 16
2014 16
2015 5
2016 15
2017 7
2018 7
2019 10
2020 4
2021 10
2022 7
2023 6
2024 5
2025 1
2026 1
Total 389
Download as CSV

Jack Goldberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack Goldberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 373 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 373
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jack Goldberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack Goldberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 92
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jack Goldberg is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine. Their subfields of study include Clinical Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas related to mental health, cardiovascular function, and biological processes, including:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Jack Goldberg has contributed to a number of recent scientific papers, with the following being among the notable publications:

  • Epigenetic Age Acceleration and Cognitive Decline: A Twin Study, 2021, The Journals of Gerontology Series A
  • Pain and Trauma: The Role of Criterion A Trauma and Stressful Life Events in the Pain and PTSD Relationship, 2021, Journal of Pain
  • The environment contributes more than genetics to smaller hippocampal volume in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), 2020, Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Association between depression and epigenetic age acceleration: A co-twin control study, 2022, Depression and Anxiety
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Chronic Pain Conditions in Men: A Twin Study, 2020, Psychosomatic Medicine

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Goldberg include:

  • Viola Vaccarino
  • J. Douglas Bremner
  • Amit Shah
  • Nancy Murrah
  • Lucy Shallenberger

Publications often appear in venues such as:

  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
  • UNC Libraries
  • Psychosomatic Medicine
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • International Journal of Cardiology

The scholarly output of Jack Goldberg spans interdisciplinary fields addressing the physiological, psychological, and molecular mechanisms underlying stress-related disorders and cardiovascular health. Their work includes investigations on epigenetic markers, cognitive decline, pain, trauma, and the interplay between genetic and environmental factors in neuropsychiatric conditions.

Best Publications

  • A Twin Study of Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Liability for Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms

    William R. True;John Rice;Seth A. Eisen;Andrew C. Heath

  • Co-occurrence of Abuse of Different Drugs in Men The Role of Drug-Specific and Shared Vulnerabilities

    Ming T. Tsuang;Michael J. Lyons;Joanne M. Meyer;Thomas Doyle

  • Common genetic vulnerability for nicotine and alcohol dependence in men.

    William R. True;Hong Xian;Jeffrey F. Scherrer;Pamela A. F. Madden

  • Genetic influences on DSM-III-R drug abuse and dependence: a study of 3,372 twin pairs.

    Ming T. Tsuang;Michael J. Lyons;Michael J. Lyons;Seth A. Eisen;Seth A. Eisen;Jack Goldberg

  • Factors associated with age-related macular degeneration. An analysis of data from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

    Jack Goldberg;Gordon Flowerdew;Ellen Smith;Jacob A. Brody

  • Common genetic vulnerability for pathological gambling and alcohol dependence in men

    Wendy S. Slutske;Seth Eisen;William R. True;Michael J. Lyons

  • Differential heritability of adult and juvenile antisocial traits.

    Michael J. Lyons;William R. True;Seth A. Eisen;Jack Goldberg

  • Sexual orientation and suicidality: a co-twin control study in adult men.

    Richard Herrell;Jack Goldberg;William R. True;Visvanathan Ramakrishnan

  • Prevalence of chronic pain in a representative sample in the United States.

    Jochen Hardt;Clemma Jacobsen;Jack Goldberg;Ralf Nickel

  • Randomized trial of light versus deep sedation on mental health after critical illness.

    Miriam M. Treggiari;Jacques André Romand;N. David Yanez;Steven A. Deem

  • Genetic and environmental contributions to smoking

    William R. True;Andrew C. Heath;Jeffrey F. Scherrer;Brian Waterman

  • A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: A report from the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry

    David S. Goldfarb;Mary E. Fischer;Yona Keich;Jack Goldberg

  • A randomized clinical trial of acupuncture compared with sham acupuncture in fibromyalgia.

    Nassim P. Assefi;Karen J. Sherman;Clemma Jacobsen;Jack Goldberg

  • Familial influences on gambling behavior: an analysis of 3359 twin pairs.

    Seth A. Eisen;Nong Lin;Michael J. Lyons;Jeffrey F. Scherrer

  • A twin study of genetic and environmental influences on suicidality in men.

    Q. Fu;Andrew C. Heath;K. K. Bucholz;E. C. Nelson

  • Decreased heart rate variability is associated with higher levels of inflammation in middle-aged men.

    Rachel Lampert;J. Douglas Bremner;Shaoyong Su;Andrew Miller

  • Shared genetic risk of major depression, alcohol dependence, and marijuana dependence: contribution of antisocial personality disorder in men.

    Qiang Fu;Andrew C. Heath;Kathleen K. Bucholz;Elliot Nelson

  • Regional variation in the incidence of hip fracture. US white women aged 65 years and older.

    Steven J. Jacobsen;Jack Goldberg;Jack Goldberg;Toni P. Miles;Jacob A. Brody

  • The Vietnam Era Twin Registry: a resource for medical research.

    W. G. Henderson;S. Eisen;J. Goldberg;W. R. True

  • Association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and oxidative stress

    Jun Dai;Dean P Jones;Jack Goldberg;Thomas R Ziegler

Frequent Co-Authors

Dedra Buchwald
Dedra Buchwald Washington State University
Viola Vaccarino
Viola Vaccarino Emory University
Michael J. Lyons
Michael J. Lyons Boston University
Seth A. Eisen
Seth A. Eisen Washington University in St. Louis
Ming T. Tsuang
Ming T. Tsuang University of California, San Diego
J. Douglas Bremner
J. Douglas Bremner Emory University
Nicholas L. Smith
Nicholas L. Smith University of Washington
Harold Snieder
Harold Snieder University Medical Center Groningen
Andrew H. Miller
Andrew H. Miller Emory University
Karestan C. Koenen
Karestan C. Koenen Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking about alternate healthcare careers or pathways besides traditional medicine? There are many flexible online programs you can consider if studying medicine in the USA feels overwhelming or isn't the right fit.

Some students transition from different backgrounds with programs like a non nursing bachelor's to msn online, which allows you to shift into nursing even if your undergraduate degree isn’t related. For those prioritizing accessibility and acceptance rates, students often ask: what's the easiest nursing program to get into? Reviewing these options can help you find the right fit for your needs and qualifications.

Alternatively, administrative healthcare roles are in high demand. There are reputable online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, making it easier to enter the field with financial support.

Finally, if test requirements are a barrier, you might wonder: do you have to take a teas test for lpn? Many nursing programs no longer require standardized entrance exams, making education more accessible. Exploring these alternative degrees and pathways gives you greater flexibility to achieve your healthcare career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jack Goldberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles