World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
14400
World Ranking
7023
National Ranking
3078

Hamid Pirahesh publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hamid Pirahesh sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 94 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hamid Pirahesh D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hamid Pirahesh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - ACM Fellow For contributions to query processing and query languages.

Overview

Hamid Pirahesh is affiliated with IBM in the United States and has a research focus spanning several areas within computer science. Their work is primarily concentrated in the fields of cloud computing and resource management, advanced database systems and queries, and distributed systems with fault tolerance.

The main fields of study for Hamid Pirahesh include:

  • Computer Science

Within this broad domain, their subfields of research cover:

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems

The primary topics addressed in their research are:

  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance

Hamid Pirahesh has contributed to publications in venues such as:

  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

Their recent scholarly output includes the paper titled "Db2 event store", published in 2020 in the Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment.

Collaboration has been a feature of their research, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Christian Garcia-Arellano
  • Hamdi Roumani
  • Richard Sidle
  • Josh Tiefenbach
  • Kostas Rakopoulos

Hamid Pirahesh has been recognized by the ACM, having received the ACM Fellow award in 2008 for contributions related to query processing and query languages.

Best Publications

  • Data cube: a relational aggregation operator generalizing GROUP-BY, CROSS-TAB, and SUB-TOTALS

    J. Gray;A. Bosworth;A. Lyaman;H. Pirahesh

  • ARIES: a transaction recovery method supporting fine-granularity locking and partial rollbacks using write-ahead logging

    C. Mohan;Don Haderle;Bruce Lindsay;Hamid Pirahesh

  • Efficiently Publishing Relational Data as XML Documents

    Jayavel Shanmugasundaram;Eugene J. Shekita;Rimon Barr;Michael J. Carey

  • Extensible/rule based query rewrite optimization in Starburst

    Hamid Pirahesh;Joseph M. Hellerstein;Waqar Hasan

  • Extensible query processing in starburst

    L. M. Haas;J. C. Freytag;G. M. Lohman;H. Pirahesh

  • The Asilomar report on database research

    Phil Bernstein;Michael Brodie;Stefano Ceri;David DeWitt

  • Starburst mid-flight: as the dust clears (database project)

    L.M. Haas;W. Chang;G.M. Lohman;J. McPherson

  • Robust query processing through progressive optimization

    Volker Markl;Vijayshankar Raman;David Simmen;Guy Lohman

  • Middle-tier database caching for e-business

    Qiong Luo;Sailesh Krishnamurthy;C. Mohan;Hamid Pirahesh

  • Extensions to Starburst: objects, types, functions, and rules

    Guy M. Lohman;Bruce Lindsay;Hamid Pirahesh;K. Bernhard Schiefer

  • The Magic of Duplicates and Aggregates

    Inderpal Singh Mumick;Hamid Pirahesh;Raghu Ramakrishnan

  • A snapshot differential refresh algorithm

    Bruce Lindsay;Laura Haas;C. Mohan;Hamid Pirahesh

  • Alert: An Architecture for Transforming a Passive DBMS into an Active DBMS

    Ulf Schreier;Hamid Pirahesh;Rakesh Agrawal;C. Mohan

  • A framework for using materialized XPath views in XML query processing

    Andrey Balmin;Fatma Özcan;Kevin S. Beyer;Roberta J. Cochrane

  • Answering complex SQL queries using automatic summary tables

    Markos Zaharioudakis;Roberta Cochrane;George Lapis;Hamid Pirahesh

  • Efficient and flexible methods for transient versioning of records to avoid locking by read-only transactions

    C. Mohan;Hamid Pirahesh;Raymond Lorie

  • Complex query decorrelation

    P. Seshadri;H. Pirahesh;T.Y.C. Leung

  • Cache tables: paving the way for an adaptive database cache

    Mehmet Altinel;Christof Bornhövd;Sailesh Krishnamurthy;C. Mohan

  • System RX: one part relational, one part XML

    Kevin Beyer;Roberta J. Cochrane;Vanja Josifovski;Jim Kleewein

  • Data Cube: A Relational Aggregation Operator Generalizing Group-By, Cross-Tab, and Sub-Totals

    Jim Gray;Surajit Chaudhuri;Adam Bosworth;Andrew Layman

Frequent Co-Authors

Chandrasekaran Mohan
Chandrasekaran Mohan IBM (United States)
Guy M. Lohman
Guy M. Lohman IBM (United States)
Bruce G. Lindsay
Bruce G. Lindsay IBM (United States)
Berthold Reinwald
Berthold Reinwald IBM (United States)
Raghu Ramakrishnan
Raghu Ramakrishnan Microsoft (United States)
Vijayshankar Raman
Vijayshankar Raman Google (United States)
Eugene J. Shekita
Eugene J. Shekita Google (United States)
Joseph M. Hellerstein
Joseph M. Hellerstein University of California, Berkeley
Volker Markl
Volker Markl Technical University of Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA often overlaps with related fields that offer unique online degree and certification opportunities. For those interested in a strong theoretical foundation, an online theoretical physics degree can reinforce math, problem-solving, and analytical skills relevant to computer modeling and AI.

Data science is another popular, tech-driven career choice. Finding the cheapest master in data science helps students gain specialized knowledge in analytics, machine learning, and big data—skills highly desired by employers.

If you’re seeking a technical or engineering-centric pathway, consider an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering. This degree broadens opportunities in hardware development, embedded systems, and IoT, which complement Computer Science careers.

Finally, short-term certifications that pay well are ideal for quickly boosting your credentials in fields like cybersecurity, cloud computing, or IT management, making you more competitive in the tech job market.

Best Scientists Citing Hamid Pirahesh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles