World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen Naylor

Stephen Naylor

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 58 10884 9826 2981 2447 203 8996

Stephen Naylor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen Naylor between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen Naylor published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 1998. 6 of the 243 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 1998. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
1984 2026

243 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen Naylor: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 1
1986 3
1987 6
1988 1
1989 2
1990 13
1991 6
1992 8
1993 7
1994 12
1995 13
1996 10
1997 17
1998 20
1999 18
2000 14
2001 15
2002 13
2003 15
2004 11
2005 4
2006 2
2007 2
2008 3
2009 0
2010 1
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
2016 2
2017 0
2018 3
2019 1
2020 1
2021 4
2022 1
2023 2
2024 4
2025 5
2026 1
Total 243
Download as CSV

Stephen Naylor publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Naylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 203 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281 203
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen Naylor D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Naylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930 58
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephen Naylor is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their research predominantly focuses on pulmonary and respiratory medicine, contributing to the fields of medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. They have published extensively on topics relating to neonatal respiratory health, respiratory support mechanisms, and studies on congenital diaphragmatic hernia, among other areas.

Naylor's work addresses specialized subjects within pulmonary and neonatal health, covering topics such as:

  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
  • Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide
  • Neuroscience of Respiration and Sleep

The scientist has contributed to several frequently cited papers in prominent journals. Some notable publications include:

  • "Role of Myeloperoxidase, Oxidative Stress, and Inflammation in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia," 2024, Antioxidants
  • "N-acetyl-lysyltyrosylcysteine amide, a novel systems pharmacology agent, reduces bronchopulmonary dysplasia in hyperoxic neonatal rat pups," 2021, Free Radical Biology and Medicine
  • "Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in impaired neonatal lung growth and bronchopulmonary dysplasia," 2022, PLoS ONE
  • "Cellular Senescence Contributes to the Progression of Hyperoxic Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia," 2023, American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
  • "Temporal Dynamics of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia," 2024, International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Naylor has published repeatedly in venues such as:

  • Free Radical Biology and Medicine
  • Antioxidants
  • PLoS ONE
  • American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Frequent collaborators in Naylor's research include Kirkwood A. Pritchard, Billy W. Day, Ru-Jeng Teng, Xigang Jing, and Deron W. Jones. These collaborations have fostered multidisciplinary approaches to complex respiratory and neonatal health challenges.

Their subfields further detail their range of expertise in areas such as pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, molecular biology, genetics, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Best Publications

  • Iron-Dependent Self-Assembly of Recombinant Yeast Frataxin: Implications for Friedreich Ataxia

    Jiri Adamec;Frank Rusnak;Whyte G. Owen;Stephen Naylor

  • Identification of a Naturally Occurring Ligand for Thymic Positive Selection

    Kristin A Hogquist;Andy J Tomlinson;William C Kieper;Maureen A McGargill

  • An approach towards the complete FAB analysis of enzymic digests of peptides and proteins

    S. Naylor;A. F. Findeis;B. W. Gibson;D. H. Williams

  • Mapping the human plasma proteome by SCX-LC-IMS-MS

    Xiaoyun Liu;Stephen J. Valentine;Manolo D. Plasencia;Sarah Trimpin

  • Rapid Determination of Transferrin Isoforms by Immunoaffinity Liquid Chromatography and Electrospray Mass Spectrometry

    Jean M. Lacey;H. Robert Bergen;Mark J. Magera;Stephen Naylor

  • Toward Plasma Proteome Profiling with Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry

    Stephen J. Valentine;Manolo D. Plasencia;Xiaoyun Liu;Meera Krishnan

  • Advancing drug discovery through systems biology.

    Eugene J. Davidov;Joanne M. Holland;Edward W. Marple;Stephen Naylor

  • Enhancement of concentration limits of detection in CE and CE-MS: a review of on-line sample extraction, cleanup, analyte preconcentration, and microreactor technology.

    A J Tomlinson;N A Guzman;S Naylor

  • Aspects of the production of FAB and SIMS mass spectra

    Dudley H. Williams;A. Frederick Findeis;Stephen Naylor;Bradford W. Gibson

  • New approaches in clinical chemistry: on-line analyte concentration and microreaction capillary electrophoresis for the determination of drugs, metabolic intermediates, and biopolymers in biological fluids.

    Norberto A. Guzman;SungAe S. Park;Daniel Schaufelberger;Luis Hernandez

  • Integrative biological analysis of the APOE*3-leiden transgenic mouse.

    Clary B. Clish;Eugene Davidov;Matej Oresic;Thomas N. Plasterer

  • Phosphorylation of Human Rad9 Is Required for Genotoxin-activated Checkpoint Signaling *

    Pia Roos-Mattjus;Kevin M. Hopkins;Andrea J. Oestreich;Benjamin T. Vroman

  • Preconcentration and microreaction technology on-line with capillary electrophoresis

    Andy J. Tomlinson;Linda M. Benson;Norberto A. Guzman;Stephen Naylor

  • Neelaredoxin, an Iron-binding Protein from the Syphilis Spirochete, Treponema pallidum, Is a Superoxide Reductase

    Tijana Jovanović;Carla Ascenso;Karsten R.O. Hazlett;Robert Sikkink

  • Simultaneous Studies of Reaction Kinetics and Structure Development in Polymer Processing

    W. Bras;G. E. Derbyshire;D. Bogg;J. Cooke

  • In vivo inhibition of aldehyde dehydrogenase by disulfiram.

    James J. Lipsky;Maryann L. Shen;Stephen Naylor

  • Rare, Structurally Homologous Self-Peptides Promote Thymocyte Positive Selection

    Fabio R Santori;William C Kieper;Stuart M Brown;Yun Lu

  • Utility of membrane preconcentration-capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry in overcoming limited sample loading for analysis of biologically derived drug metabolites, peptides, and proteins

    Andy J. Tomlinson;Linda M. Benson;Stephen Jameson;Douglas H. Johnson

  • Cisplatin and dimethyl sulfoxide react to form an adducted compound with reduced cytotoxicity and neurotoxicity

    Stephanie J. Fischer;Linda M. Benson;Abdul Fauq;Stephen Naylor

  • Comparison of protein mixtures in aqueous humor by membrane preconcentration - capillary electrophoresis - mass spectrometry.

    E. Rohde;Andy J. Tomlinson;D. H. Johnson;Stephen Naylor

  • Systematic development of on-line membrane preconcentration-capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry for the analysis of peptide mixtures.

    Tomlinson Aj;Naylor S

  • A Strategy for Sequencing Peptides from Dilute Mixtures at the Low Femtomole Level Using Membrane Preconcentration-Capillary Electro-Phoresis-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MPC-CE-MS/MS)

    Andy J. Tomlinson;Stephen Naylor

  • Inhibition of aldehyde dehydrogenase by disulfiram and its metabolite methyl diethylthiocarbamoyl-sulfoxide.

    Karen A. Veverka;Kenneth L. Johnson;Dennis C. Mays;James J. Lipsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerald J. Gleich
Gerald J. Gleich University of Utah
Rajiv Kumar
Rajiv Kumar Mayo Clinic
Dudley H. Williams
Dudley H. Williams University of Cambridge
Stephen C. Jameson
Stephen C. Jameson University of Minnesota
David E. Clemmer
David E. Clemmer Indiana University
Peter B. Farmer
Peter B. Farmer University of Leicester
Matej Orešič
Matej Orešič Örebro University
Clary B. Clish
Clary B. Clish Broad Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various specialized careers that often require targeted education and training. For those interested in law-related chemistry roles, exploring the different types of paralegal degrees and salaries can provide insight into legal support positions involving chemical patents or environmental law.

If your passion lies in healthcare and pharmaceuticals, becoming a pharmaceutical sales rep is a popular career path. Learning how to become a pharmaceutical sales rep, salary, and career paths will help you understand the necessary skills and opportunities in this dynamic field.

For a more advanced scientific career, discovering how much schooling to be a pharmacist is crucial. Pharmacists require extensive education, but their expertise in medication and patient care can be highly rewarding and stable.

Alternatively, combining chemistry with forensic science offers unique opportunities. Those curious about death investigations might consider how to become an autopsy tech education, salary, and job outlook, where chemistry knowledge supports forensic analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen Naylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles