World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3084 2840 1755 1580 255 18844

Alan S. Kaufman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alan S. Kaufman between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alan S. Kaufman published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1973. 11 of the 288 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1973. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 2 publications 1973: 10 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 7 publications 1976: 6 publications 1977: 7 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 6 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 8 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 7 publications
1971 2025

288 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alan S. Kaufman: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 2
1973 10
1974 2
1975 7
1976 6
1977 7
1978 3
1979 5
1980 6
1981 4
1982 1
1983 6
1984 4
1985 2
1986 6
1987 4
1988 7
1989 5
1990 6
1991 5
1992 2
1993 7
1994 10
1995 6
1996 10
1997 3
1998 7
1999 7
2000 8
2001 10
2002 7
2003 5
2004 6
2005 2
2006 6
2007 1
2008 5
2009 6
2010 8
2011 3
2012 3
2013 5
2014 9
2015 7
2016 6
2017 6
2018 5
2019 5
2020 0
2021 1
2022 8
2023 4
2024 4
2025 7
Total 288
Download as CSV

Alan S. Kaufman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan S. Kaufman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 251–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 255 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201 255
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Alan S. Kaufman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan S. Kaufman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Alan S. Kaufman is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology with a focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, pediatrics, perinatology, and child health, developmental and educational psychology, clinical psychology, and education.

The scientist's work centers on topics including cognitive abilities and testing, infant development and preterm care, language development and disorders, family and disability support research, child nutrition and water access, poverty, education and child welfare, and early childhood education and development.

Recent scholarly contributions include:

  • Piloting the adaptation of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-2nd edition (KABC-II) to assess school-age neurodevelopment in rural Zimbabwe (2022, Wellcome Open Research)
  • Does the Degree of Prematurity Relate to the Bayley-4 Scores Earned by Matched Samples of Infants and Toddlers across the Cognitive, Language, and Motor Domains? (2023, Journal of Intelligence)
  • The Precipitous Decline in Reasoning and Other Key Abilities with Age and Its Implications for Federal Judges (2021, Journal of Intelligence)
  • Assessment of Human Intelligence-The State of the Art in the 2020s (2024, Journal of Intelligence)
  • Bayley-4 performance of very young children with autism, developmental delay, and language impairment (2022, Psychology in the Schools)

Frequent collaborators include Emily L. Winter, Jacqueline M. Caemmerer, Sierra M. Trudel, Melissa A. Bray, and Brittany A. Dale.

The scientist has published frequently in these venues:

  • Journal of Intelligence (6 publications)
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America (4 publications)
  • Psychology in the Schools (2 publications)
  • Goldschmidt2022 abstracts (2 publications)
  • Wellcome Open Research (1 publication)

Best Publications

  • Assessing Adolescent and Adult Intelligence

    Alan S. Kaufman

  • Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test

    Nadeen L. Kaufman;Alan S. Kaufman

  • Intelligent testing with the WISC-R

    Alan S. Kaufman

  • Factor analysis of the WISC-R at 11 age levels between 61/2 and 161/2 years.

    Alan S. Kaufman

  • Essentials of WAIS -III Assessment

    Elizabeth O. Lichtenberger;Alan S. Kaufman

  • Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children

    David Loomis;Ryan Holt;James C. Kaufman;Alan S. Kaufman

  • Development and validation of a Rasch-derived CES-D short form.

    Jason C. Cole;Adele S. Rabin;Tom L. Smith;Alan S. Kaufman

  • Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition

    Alan S. Kaufman;Nadeen L. Kaufman

  • Essentials of WISC-IV Assessment

    Elizabeth O. Lichtenberger;Alan S. Kaufman

  • Critical Issues in Response-To-Intervention, Comprehensive Evaluation, and Specific Learning Disabilities Identification and Intervention: An Expert White Paper Consensus

    J. Hale;V. Alfonso;V. Berninger;B. Bracken

  • Implementation of idea : Integrating response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods

    James B. Hale;Alan Kaufman;Jack A. Naglieri;Kenneth A. Kavale

  • Are cognitive g and academic achievement g one and the same g? An exploration on the Woodcock–Johnson and Kaufman tests

    Scott Barry Kaufman;Matthew R. Reynolds;Xin Liu;Alan S. Kaufman

  • Sex, race, residence, region, and education differences on the 11 WAIS-R subtests.

    Alan S. Kaufman;James E. McLean;Cecil R. Reynolds

  • Demographic characteristics and IQ among adults: Analysis of the WAIS—R standardization sample as a function of the stratification variables.

    Cecil R. Reynolds;Robert L. Chastain;Alan S. Kaufman;James E. McLean

  • Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition

    Alan S. Kaufman;Nadeen L. Kaufman

  • A New Approach to the Interpretation of Test Scatter on the WISC-R

    Alan S. Kaufman

  • Verbal-performance IQ discrepancies on the WISC-R.

    Alan S. Kaufman

  • Test Review: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV)

    Alan S. Kaufman;Dawn P. Flanagan;Vincent C. Alfonso;Jennifer T. Mascolo

  • Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence, 3rd ed.

    Alan S. Kaufman;Elizabeth O. Lichtenberger

  • Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children

    Alan S. Kaufman;Nadeen L. Kaufman

  • McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities

    Alan S. Kaufman;Mary E. Stinson;Elizabeth O. Lichtenberger

  • The essentials of WAIS-III assessment

    Alan S. Kaufman;Elizabeth O. Lichtenberger

Frequent Co-Authors

James C. Kaufman
James C. Kaufman University of Connecticut
Cecil R. Reynolds
Cecil R. Reynolds Texas A&M University
Matthew R. Reynolds
Matthew R. Reynolds Tufts University
John O. Willis
John O. Willis Rivier University
Domenic V. Cicchetti
Domenic V. Cicchetti Yale University
Jack A. Naglieri
Jack A. Naglieri University of Virginia
Katie A. McLaughlin
Katie A. McLaughlin University of Oregon
Ron Dumont
Ron Dumont Fairleigh Dickinson University
Kevin S. McGrew
Kevin S. McGrew University of Minnesota
Dawn P. Flanagan
Dawn P. Flanagan St. John's University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore the field of psychology in the USA, it’s worth considering related online degrees that can open up diverse career opportunities. Social work stands out as a closely connected pathway, offering roles in counseling, community outreach, healthcare, and advocacy. Many universities now provide flexible online programs, enabling you to balance studies with personal and professional commitments.

If you’d like to pursue social work, research programs that offer a blend of comprehensive coursework, practical experience, and high employability. For example, you can review the most valuable online social work degree programs in Kansas or explore the most valuable online social work programs in Maryland for regional options. Broader options like the most valuable online social work degrees in the Midwest are available, as well as specialized lists like the most valuable online social work programs in Nevada.

Graduates with backgrounds in psychology or social work can pursue careers in mental health, family services, education, or clinical practice. Choosing an accredited online program is essential to ensure your qualifications are recognized and valued by employers.

Best Scientists Citing Alan S. Kaufman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles