World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
13246
World Ranking
8049
National Ranking
4309

Joseph J. Ryan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph J. Ryan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 256 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joseph J. Ryan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph J. Ryan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Joseph J. Ryan is affiliated with the University of Central Missouri in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of medicine and psychology, with a key focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and clinical psychology. Additional areas of study include safety research and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including dementia and cognitive impairment research, cognitive abilities and testing, cognitive functions and memory, child abuse and trauma, pharmaceutical studies and practices, respiratory and cough-related research, and multiple sclerosis research studies.

Joseph J. Ryan has published multiple papers over recent years. Some of the notable papers include:

  • "Wechsler memory scale-fourth edition (WMS-IV) in the neuropsychological evaluation of patients diagnosed with probable Alzheimer's disease," 2023, Applied Neuropsychology Adult
  • "Validity of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Second Edition (WASI-II) as an Indicator of Neurological Disease/Injury: A Pilot Study," 2021, Brain Injury

Other papers in the broader dataset, although not authored by Ryan, indicate relevant research trends in their field:

  • "Discrimination in Multiphase Systems: Evidence from Child Protection," 2024, The Quarterly Journal of Economics
  • "The impact of drug palatability on prescribing and dispensing of antibiotic formulations for paediatric patients: a cross-sectional survey of general practitioners and pharmacists," 2023, Family Practice
  • "Memory Performance and Quantitative Neuroimaging Software in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Concurrent Validity Study," 2020, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ryan include:

  • Samuel T. Gontkovsky
  • David S. Kreiner
  • Gordon Teichner
  • E. Jason Baron
  • Joseph Doyle

The most common publication venues for Ryan's work are:

  • Applied Neuropsychology Adult
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
  • Goldschmidt Abstracts
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Joseph J. Ryan was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1994, which reflects a notable standing within the psychological research community.

Best Publications

  • Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III

    Joseph J. Ryan;Shane J. Lopez

  • Physical Activity Across the Curriculum (PAAC): A randomized controlled trial to promote physical activity and diminish overweight and obesity in elementary school children

    Joseph E. Donnelly;Jerry L. Greene;Cheryl A. Gibson;Bryan K. Smith

  • Scoring Reliability on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III):

    Joseph J. Ryan;Summer D. Schnakenberg-Ott

  • Rey auditory-verbal learning test performance of patients with and without memory impairment

    Samuel J. Rosenberg;Joseph J. Ryan;Aurelio Prifitera

  • Age effects on Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III subtests.

    Joseph J Ryan;Jerome M Sattler;Shane J Lopez

  • Physical activity across the curriculum: Year one process evaluation results

    Cheryl A Gibson;Bryan K Smith;Katrina D DuBose;J Leon Greene

  • Validity of the narcissistic personality inventory (NPI) in a psychiatric sample

    Aurelio Prifitera;Joseph J. Ryan

  • Dissociative Symptoms in a Substance Abuse Population

    G. E. Dunn;A. M. Paolo;Joseph J. Ryan;J. Van Fleet

  • A screening procedure for estimating premorbid intelligence in the elderly

    Joseph J. Ryan;Anthony M. Paolo

  • Subclinical hypothyroidism, mood, and cognition in older adults: a review

    Russell T. Joffe;Russell T. Joffe;Elizabeth N. Pearce;James V. Hennessey;Joseph J. Ryan

  • Validity, reliability, and standard errors of measurement for two seven-subtest short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—III.

    Joseph J. Ryan;L. Charles Ward

  • Evaluation of seven-subtest short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III in a referred sample

    Bradley N Axelrod;Joseph J Ryan;L.Charles Ward

  • Standardization of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised for persons 75 years and older.

    Joseph J. Ryan;Anthony M. Paolo;Terry M. Brungardt

  • Trauma Symptoms in Substance Abusers With and Without Histories of Childhood Abuse

    Gary E. Dunn;Joseph J. Ryan;Cynthia E. Dunn

  • California verbal learning test: Normative data for the elderly

    Anthony M. Paolo;Alexander I. Tröster;Joseph J. Ryan

  • Alternate form reliability and equivalency of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test.

    Joseph J. Ryan;Michael E. Geisser;David M. Randall;Randy J. Georgemiller

  • Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) in Adult Standardization and Clinical Samples

    Joseph J. Ryan;Christine A. Carruthers;Lori J. Miller;Gary T. Souheaver

  • Factor analysis of the Rey auditory-verbal learning test

    J. J. Ryan;S. J. Rosenberg;W. Mittenberg

  • Administration Time Estimates for WAIS-III Subtests, Scales, and Short Forms in a Clinical Sample

    Joseph J. Ryan;Shane J. Lopez;Tamara R. Werth

  • Neuropsychological patterns in uremia.

    Gary T. Souheaver;Joseph J. Ryan;Alan S. Dewolfe

Frequent Co-Authors

Shane J. Lopez
Shane J. Lopez University of Kansas
Bradley N. Axelrod
Bradley N. Axelrod United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Alexander I. Tröster
Alexander I. Tröster Barrow Neurological Institute
Charles J. Golden
Charles J. Golden Nova Southeastern University
Russell T. Joffe
Russell T. Joffe Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Philip Schatz
Philip Schatz Saint Joseph's University
Leslie Atkinson
Leslie Atkinson Toronto Metropolitan University
Robert S. Stern
Robert S. Stern Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
William C. Koller
William C. Koller University of Miami
Robert Goldman
Robert Goldman Sunovion (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in psychology unlocks diverse online degree options and career opportunities, including roles like Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). Aspiring MFTs should be aware that certification and education requirements can vary greatly between states and even cities.

For example, those considering practicing in Baltimore must review the Baltimore mft certification requirements to ensure they meet state and local guidelines. Similarly, students planning to work in Idaho should familiarize themselves with the Boise mft education requirements for licensure eligibility.

If Boston is your destination, understanding how to become an mft in Boston is essential for navigating local credentialing processes. Likewise, meeting mft requirements in Buffalo is critical for successful practice in that region.

Overall, pursuing an online psychology degree gives you flexibility, but always research the specific regulations and training needed for your preferred location and career path.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph J. Ryan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles