World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8081 7541 4329 3937 185 10887

Robert Goldman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert Goldman between 1989 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert Goldman published across 36 years, from 1989 to 2024, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2017. 3 of the 193 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2017. 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications
1989 2024

193 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert Goldman: publications per year, 1989 to 2024
Year Publications
1989 3
1990 0
1991 6
1992 8
1993 6
1994 8
1995 12
1996 11
1997 5
1998 8
1999 4
2000 6
2001 2
2002 4
2003 3
2004 2
2005 2
2006 3
2007 3
2008 4
2009 1
2010 2
2011 2
2012 0
2013 0
2014 2
2015 7
2016 5
2017 17
2018 11
2019 14
2020 15
2021 11
2022 3
2023 1
2024 2
Total 193
Download as CSV

Robert Goldman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Goldman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 185 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 185
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert Goldman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Goldman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert Goldman is affiliated with Sunovion in the United States and has contributed significantly to research in medicine and psychology. Their work primarily focuses on psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, and related subfields. The scientist's publications cover areas such as bipolar disorder and treatment, schizophrenia research and treatment, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, eating disorders and behaviors, pharmaceutical studies and practices, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, and the influence of neurotransmitter receptors on behavior.

Goldman has published extensively in the following venues:

  • CNS Spectrums
  • European Psychiatry
  • New England Journal of Medicine
  • Schizophrenia
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Their recent prominent papers include:

  • A Non-D2-Receptor-Binding Drug for the Treatment of Schizophrenia, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Safety and Effectiveness of Ulotaront (SEP-363856) in Schizophrenia: Results of a 6-Month, Open-Label Extension Study, 2021, Schizophrenia
  • Efficacy and Safety of Dasotraline in Adults With Binge-Eating Disorder, 2020, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
  • Efficacy and Safety of Dasotraline in Adults with Binge-Eating Disorder: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose Clinical Trial, 2020, CNS Spectrums
  • Safety and Effectiveness of SEP−363856 in Schizophrenia: Results of a 6-Month, Open-Label Extension Study, 2021, CNS Spectrums

Goldman frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Andrei Pikalov
  • Michael Tocco
  • Antony Loebel
  • Kenneth S. Koblan
  • Justine Kent

The main fields of study for Goldman's research are medicine, with a focus on psychiatric conditions, and psychology, with specific emphasis on mental health issues. Their work intersects multiple clinical and molecular disciplines addressing complex neuropsychiatric disorders.

The scientist's publication record shows a consistent engagement with research topics that include bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, eating disorders, and the neurological mechanisms influencing behavior. Their contributions provide data on clinical treatments and pharmaceutical interventions for these conditions.

Best Publications

  • Predictors of relapse following response from a first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

    Delbert Robinson;Margaret G. Woerner;Jose Ma. J. Alvir;Robert Bilder

  • Neuropsychology of first-episode schizophrenia: initial characterization and clinical correlates.

    Robert M. Bilder;Robert S. Goldman;Delbert Robinson;Gail Reiter

  • Neurocognitive effects of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

    Robert M. Bilder;Robert S. Goldman;Jan Volavka;Pal Czobor

  • Predictors of Treatment Response From a First Episode of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder

    Delbert G. Robinson;Margaret G. Woerner;Jose Ma.J. Alvir;Stephen Geisler

  • Cognitive improvement after treatment with second-generation antipsychotic medications in first-episode schizophrenia: is it a practice effect?

    Terry E. Goldberg;Robert S. Goldman;Katherine E. Burdick;Anil K. Malhotra

  • Neurocognitive correlates of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism in chronic schizophrenia

    Robert M. Bilder;Jan Volavka;Pál Czobor;Anil K. Malhotra

  • Efficacy of donepezil in mild cognitive impairment A randomized placebo-controlled trial

    S Salloway;S Ferris;A Kluger;R Goldman

  • Efficacy of donepezil in early-stage Alzheimer disease: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

    Ben Seltzer;Parvaneh Zolnouni;Margarita Nunez;Robert Goldman

  • A Non–D2-Receptor-Binding Drug for the Treatment of Schizophrenia

    Kenneth S Koblan;Justine Kent;Seth C Hopkins;John H Krystal

  • Meta-analysis of symptom factors in schizophrenia

    Bret S. Grube;Robert M. Bilder;Robert M. Bilder;Robert M. Bilder;Robert S. Goldman

  • Auditory Sensory Dysfunction in Schizophrenia: Imprecision or Distractibility?

    Esther F. Rabinowicz;Gail Silipo;Robert Goldman;Daniel C. Javitt

  • Correlates of substance misuse in patients with first-episode schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

    Serge Sevy;Delbert G. Robinson;Scott Holloway;Jose M. Alvir

  • Dexamethasone suppression test in schizophrenia: Relationship to symptomatology, ventricular enlargement, and outcome

    Rajiv Tandon;Cheryl Mazzara;John R. DeQuardo;Katherine A. Craig

  • Cognitive Development in Schizophrenia: Follow-Back from the First Episode

    Robert M. Bilder;Gail Reiter;Jay Bates;Todd Lencz

  • Efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: significant placebo/practice effects in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    Richard S E Keefe;Anil K Malhotra;Herbert Y Meltzer;John M Kane

  • Circumstances Under Which Practice Does Not Make Perfect: A Review of the Practice Effect Literature in Schizophrenia and Its Relevance to Clinical Treatment Studies

    Terry E Goldberg;Richard S E Keefe;Robert S Goldman;Delbert G Robinson

  • Discriminability of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test using the standardization sample.

    Bradley N. Axelrod;Robert S. Goldman;Robert K. Heaton;Glenn Curtiss

  • VALIDATION OF THE 16-ITEM NEGATIVE SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT

    Bradley N. Axelrod;Robert S. Goldman;Robert S. Goldman;Larry D. Alphs;Larry D. Alphs;Larry D. Alphs

  • Neuropsychological correlates of hippocampal volumes in patients experiencing a first episode of schizophrenia.

    Philip R. Szeszko;Rael D. Strous;Robert S. Goldman;Manzar Ashtari

  • Reduced anterior cingulate gyrus volume correlates with executive dysfunction in men with first-episode schizophrenia☆

    Philip R. Szeszko;Philip R. Szeszko;Robert M. Bilder;Robert M. Bilder;Robert M. Bilder;Todd Lencz;Manzar Ashtari

  • Efficacy and Safety of Lurasidone in Children and Adolescents With Bipolar I Depression: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

    Melissa P. DelBello;Robert Goldman;Debra Phillips;Ling Deng

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert M. Bilder
Robert M. Bilder University of California, Los Angeles
Rajiv Tandon
Rajiv Tandon Western Michigan University
Bradley N. Axelrod
Bradley N. Axelrod United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Stanley Berent
Stanley Berent University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jeffrey A. Lieberman
Jeffrey A. Lieberman Columbia University
John M. Kane
John M. Kane Zucker Hillside Hospital
Stephan F. Taylor
Stephan F. Taylor University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christoph U. Correll
Christoph U. Correll Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Katherine E. Burdick
Katherine E. Burdick Brigham and Women's Hospital
Leslie Citrome
Leslie Citrome New York Medical College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Psychology in the USA, you may also want to explore related online degrees in fields like Social Work. Earning a degree in Social Work can provide additional career pathways, such as counseling, case management, and community outreach positions. These professions often overlap with psychology, especially for those interested in helping individuals and families overcome challenges.

There are many high-quality online Social Work programs available across the country. For example, students seeking flexibility and regional focus might consider the top online social work programs in Ohio or the top online social work programs in Texas. Those researching a wider range of options can look into the best online social work degree programs in America for a national perspective.

For those interested in a local approach within specific communities, exploring the best online social work programs in Waco can be particularly useful. Each of these online degree programs can open diverse career pathways and complement a background in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Goldman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles