World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 59 3619 3336 2031 1830 146 29235

Mark W. Lipsey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark W. Lipsey between 1972 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark W. Lipsey published across 53 years, from 1972 to 2024, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2007. 1 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2007. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 4 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1972 2024

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark W. Lipsey: publications per year, 1972 to 2024
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 3
1975 0
1976 1
1977 1
1978 4
1979 0
1980 0
1981 4
1982 0
1983 1
1984 3
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 4
1989 2
1990 4
1991 2
1992 1
1993 3
1994 1
1995 2
1996 1
1997 3
1998 3
1999 4
2000 7
2001 5
2002 2
2003 3
2004 1
2005 4
2006 8
2007 13
2008 3
2009 7
2010 3
2011 7
2012 9
2013 6
2014 7
2015 6
2016 6
2017 4
2018 5
2019 2
2020 2
2021 1
2022 2
2023 0
2024 1
Total 164
Download as CSV

Mark W. Lipsey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Lipsey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 146 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 146
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark W. Lipsey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Lipsey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 59
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark W. Lipsey is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Health Professions, with particular contributions in education and health-related topics. Their academic work addresses subfields such as Education, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The scientist's research focuses on several key topics including Early Childhood Education and Development, Parental Involvement in Education, Health Policy Implementation Science, Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis, Family and Disability Support Research, Behavioral and Psychological Studies, and School Choice and Performance.

Mark W. Lipsey has been involved in numerous publications, notably appearing in frequent venues such as:

  • Criminology & Public Policy
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
  • AERA Open
  • Prevention Science

Recent publications by Mark W. Lipsey include:

  • "Effects of a statewide pre-kindergarten program on children's achievement and behavior through sixth grade." (2022), published in Developmental Psychology
  • "Revisited: Effective use of the large body of research on the effectiveness of programs for juvenile offenders and the failure of the model programs approach" (2020), published in Criminology & Public Policy
  • "Teachers, Schools, and Pre-K Effect Persistence: An Examination of the Sustaining Environment Hypothesis" (2020), published in Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
  • "Impact of the Tennessee Voluntary Prekindergarten Program on Children's Literacy, Language, and Mathematics Skills: Results From a Regression-Discontinuity Design" (2021), published in AERA Open
  • "Scaling up effective juvenile delinquency programs by focusing on change levers: Evidence from a large meta-analysis" (2024), published in Criminology & Public Policy

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Dale C. Farran
  • Kelley Durkin
  • Sarah E. Wiesen
  • Francis A. Pearman
  • Matthew P. Springer

Best Publications

  • The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. Confirmation from meta-analysis.

    Mark W. Lipsey;David B. Wilson

  • Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research

    Mark W. Lipsey

  • Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research.

    Mark W. Lipsey;James H. Derzon

  • Effective Intervention for Serious Juvenile Offenders

    Mark W. Lipsey;David B. Wilson;Lynn Cothern

  • Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Sizes in Research

    Carolyn J. Hill;Howard S. Bloom;Alison Rebeck Black;Mark W. Lipsey

  • Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research.

    Peter A. Lachenbruch;Mark W. Lipsey

  • Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research.

    Mark W. Lipsey;David B. Wilson

  • The Primary Factors that Characterize Effective Interventions with Juvenile Offenders: A Meta-Analytic Overview

    Mark W. Lipsey

  • The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: A Review of Systematic Reviews

    Mark W. Lipsey;Francis T. Cullen

  • The positive effects of cognitive–behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment

    Nana A. Landenberger;Mark W. Lipsey

  • The effects of school-based intervention programs on aggressive behavior: a meta-analysis.

    Sandra Jo Wilson;Mark W. Lipsey;James H. Derzon

  • School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: update of a meta-analysis.

    Sandra Jo Wilson;Mark W. Lipsey

  • Translating the Statistical Representation of the Effects of Education Interventions Into More Readily Interpretable Forms

    Mark W. Lipsey;Kelly Puzio;Cathy Yun;Michael A. Hebert

  • Performance Trajectories and Performance Gaps as Achievement Effect-Size Benchmarks for Educational Interventions

    Howard S. Bloom;Carolyn J. Hill;Alison Rebeck Black;Mark W. Lipsey

  • Brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Emily E. Tanner-Smith;Mark W. Lipsey

  • What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents

    Mark W. Lipsey

  • The comparative effectiveness of outpatient treatment for adolescent substance abuse: A meta-analysis

    Emily E. Tanner-Smith;Sandra Jo Wilson;Mark W. Lipsey

  • A practitioner's guide to meta-analysis

    Joseph A. Durlak;Mark W. Lipsey

  • The role of method in treatment effectiveness research: evidence from meta-analysis.

    David B. Wilson;Mark W. Lipsey

  • Those Confounded Moderators in Meta-Analysis: Good, Bad, and Ugly:

    Mark W. Lipsey

  • Performance Trajectories and Performance Gaps as Achievement Effect-Size Benchmarks for Educational Interventions. MDRC Working Papers on Research Methodology.

    Howard S. Bloom;Carolyn J. Hill;Alison Rebeck Black;Mark W. Lipsey

  • The Efficacy of Psychological, Educational, and Behavioral Treatment

    Mark W. Lipsey;David B. Wilson

  • Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research.

    A. D. Garrett;Mark W. Lipsey

Frequent Co-Authors

Dale C. Farran
Dale C. Farran Vanderbilt University
Emily E. Tanner-Smith
Emily E. Tanner-Smith University of Oregon
David Weisburd
David Weisburd Hebrew University of Jerusalem
J. David Hawkins
J. David Hawkins University of Washington
Joseph A. Durlak
Joseph A. Durlak Loyola University Chicago
Julie Sarama
Julie Sarama University of Denver
Peter H. Rossi
Peter H. Rossi University of Massachusetts Amherst
Denise C. Gottfredson
Denise C. Gottfredson University of Maryland, College Park
Douglas H. Clements
Douglas H. Clements University of Denver
Francis T. Cullen
Francis T. Cullen University of Cincinnati

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens up numerous online pathways, including options in Social Work and related helping professions. Many students interested in making a positive impact choose to pursue Social Work alongside or after Psychology, as the fields often overlap and offer diverse career outcomes.

Online Social Work degrees are especially appealing due to their accessibility and affordability. For example, students in Hawaii may consider the cheapest social work programs in Honolulu for budget-friendly options. Similarly, those based in the Midwest might look into the cheapest social work degrees in Iowa or affordable social work programs in Indiana.

Beyond Psychology, online Social Work programs can help launch or advance careers in counseling, school support services, and community leadership. Aspiring professionals can also explore the cheapest social work programs in Kansas for additional cost-effective degree choices. No matter your location, these related online degrees offer practical and rewarding career pathways for those passionate about helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Lipsey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles