World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
29235
World Ranking
3619
National Ranking
2031

Mark W. Lipsey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Lipsey sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 146 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark W. Lipsey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Lipsey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark W. Lipsey is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Health Professions, with particular contributions in education and health-related topics. Their academic work addresses subfields such as Education, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The scientist's research focuses on several key topics including Early Childhood Education and Development, Parental Involvement in Education, Health Policy Implementation Science, Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis, Family and Disability Support Research, Behavioral and Psychological Studies, and School Choice and Performance.

Mark W. Lipsey has been involved in numerous publications, notably appearing in frequent venues such as:

  • Criminology & Public Policy
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
  • AERA Open
  • Prevention Science

Recent publications by Mark W. Lipsey include:

  • "Effects of a statewide pre-kindergarten program on children's achievement and behavior through sixth grade." (2022), published in Developmental Psychology
  • "Revisited: Effective use of the large body of research on the effectiveness of programs for juvenile offenders and the failure of the model programs approach" (2020), published in Criminology & Public Policy
  • "Teachers, Schools, and Pre-K Effect Persistence: An Examination of the Sustaining Environment Hypothesis" (2020), published in Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
  • "Impact of the Tennessee Voluntary Prekindergarten Program on Children's Literacy, Language, and Mathematics Skills: Results From a Regression-Discontinuity Design" (2021), published in AERA Open
  • "Scaling up effective juvenile delinquency programs by focusing on change levers: Evidence from a large meta-analysis" (2024), published in Criminology & Public Policy

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Dale C. Farran
  • Kelley Durkin
  • Sarah E. Wiesen
  • Francis A. Pearman
  • Matthew P. Springer

Best Publications

  • The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. Confirmation from meta-analysis.

    Mark W. Lipsey;David B. Wilson

  • Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research

    Mark W. Lipsey

  • Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research.

    Mark W. Lipsey;James H. Derzon

  • Effective Intervention for Serious Juvenile Offenders

    Mark W. Lipsey;David B. Wilson;Lynn Cothern

  • Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Sizes in Research

    Carolyn J. Hill;Howard S. Bloom;Alison Rebeck Black;Mark W. Lipsey

  • Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research.

    Peter A. Lachenbruch;Mark W. Lipsey

  • Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research.

    Mark W. Lipsey;David B. Wilson

  • The Primary Factors that Characterize Effective Interventions with Juvenile Offenders: A Meta-Analytic Overview

    Mark W. Lipsey

  • The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: A Review of Systematic Reviews

    Mark W. Lipsey;Francis T. Cullen

  • The positive effects of cognitive–behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment

    Nana A. Landenberger;Mark W. Lipsey

  • The effects of school-based intervention programs on aggressive behavior: a meta-analysis.

    Sandra Jo Wilson;Mark W. Lipsey;James H. Derzon

  • School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: update of a meta-analysis.

    Sandra Jo Wilson;Mark W. Lipsey

  • Translating the Statistical Representation of the Effects of Education Interventions Into More Readily Interpretable Forms

    Mark W. Lipsey;Kelly Puzio;Cathy Yun;Michael A. Hebert

  • Performance Trajectories and Performance Gaps as Achievement Effect-Size Benchmarks for Educational Interventions

    Howard S. Bloom;Carolyn J. Hill;Alison Rebeck Black;Mark W. Lipsey

  • Brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Emily E. Tanner-Smith;Mark W. Lipsey

  • What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents

    Mark W. Lipsey

  • The comparative effectiveness of outpatient treatment for adolescent substance abuse: A meta-analysis

    Emily E. Tanner-Smith;Sandra Jo Wilson;Mark W. Lipsey

  • A practitioner's guide to meta-analysis

    Joseph A. Durlak;Mark W. Lipsey

  • The role of method in treatment effectiveness research: evidence from meta-analysis.

    David B. Wilson;Mark W. Lipsey

  • Those Confounded Moderators in Meta-Analysis: Good, Bad, and Ugly:

    Mark W. Lipsey

  • Performance Trajectories and Performance Gaps as Achievement Effect-Size Benchmarks for Educational Interventions. MDRC Working Papers on Research Methodology.

    Howard S. Bloom;Carolyn J. Hill;Alison Rebeck Black;Mark W. Lipsey

  • The Efficacy of Psychological, Educational, and Behavioral Treatment

    Mark W. Lipsey;David B. Wilson

  • Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research.

    A. D. Garrett;Mark W. Lipsey

Frequent Co-Authors

Dale C. Farran
Dale C. Farran Vanderbilt University
Emily E. Tanner-Smith
Emily E. Tanner-Smith University of Oregon
David Weisburd
David Weisburd Hebrew University of Jerusalem
J. David Hawkins
J. David Hawkins University of Washington
Joseph A. Durlak
Joseph A. Durlak Loyola University Chicago
Julie Sarama
Julie Sarama University of Denver
Peter H. Rossi
Peter H. Rossi University of Massachusetts Amherst
Denise C. Gottfredson
Denise C. Gottfredson University of Maryland, College Park
Douglas H. Clements
Douglas H. Clements University of Denver
Francis T. Cullen
Francis T. Cullen University of Cincinnati

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens up numerous online pathways, including options in Social Work and related helping professions. Many students interested in making a positive impact choose to pursue Social Work alongside or after Psychology, as the fields often overlap and offer diverse career outcomes.

Online Social Work degrees are especially appealing due to their accessibility and affordability. For example, students in Hawaii may consider the cheapest social work programs in Honolulu for budget-friendly options. Similarly, those based in the Midwest might look into the cheapest social work degrees in Iowa or affordable social work programs in Indiana.

Beyond Psychology, online Social Work programs can help launch or advance careers in counseling, school support services, and community leadership. Aspiring professionals can also explore the cheapest social work programs in Kansas for additional cost-effective degree choices. No matter your location, these related online degrees offer practical and rewarding career pathways for those passionate about helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Lipsey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles