World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
19147
World Ranking
7744
National Ranking
3345

Matthew L. Miller publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew L. Miller sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 111 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Matthew L. Miller D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew L. Miller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew L. Miller is affiliated with NEC in the United States and specializes in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including Oncology, General Health Professions, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Genetics. This diverse expertise supports interdisciplinary approaches to biomedical and health research.

The main topics covered by Miller's research include Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments, Neonatal Respiratory Health Research, Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Youth Development and Social Support, Teacher Education and Leadership Studies, Resilience and Mental Health, and CAR-T cell therapy research. These areas reflect a focus on both fundamental biomedical mechanisms and applications in health professions and education.

Among recent publications, Miller has contributed to several papers:

  • "ALK upregulates POSTN and WNT signaling to drive neuroblastoma," 2024, published in Cell Reports
  • "Building Resilience in Rural STEM Teachers Through a Noyce Professional Learning Community," 2025, published in Education Sciences
  • "Augmenting T-cell responses to tumors by in situ nanomanufacturing," 2020, published in Materials Horizons
  • "Development and Testing an Interprofessional Plié Training Program for VA Nursing Home Staff," 2022, published in Innovation in Aging

Miller frequently collaborates with a number of coauthors, including Miller Huang, Wanqi Fang, Alvin Farrel, Linwei Li, and Antonios Chronopoulos. These collaborations contribute to the interdisciplinary nature of their research.

Primary publication venues for Miller's work include Cell Reports, Education Sciences, Materials Horizons, and Innovation in Aging. The presence in these varied journals indicates contributions to fields ranging from molecular and cellular biology to education and healthcare innovation.

Best Publications

  • Digital Watermarking

    Ingemar Cox;Matthew L. Miller;Jeffery A. Bloom

  • Digital Watermarking and Steganography

    Ingemar Cox;Matthew Miller;Jeffrey Bloom;Jessica Fridrich

  • Rotation, scale, and translation resilient watermarking for images

    C.-Y. Lin;M. Wu;J.A. Bloom;I.J. Cox

  • The Bayesian image retrieval system, PicHunter: theory, implementation, and psychophysical experiments

    I.J. Cox;M.L. Miller;T.P. Minka;T.V. Papathomas

  • Watermarking as communications with side information

    I.J. Cox;M.L. Miller;A.L. McKellips

  • The first 50 years of electronic watermarking

    Ingemar J. Cox;Matt L. Miller

  • Review of watermarking and the importance of perceptual modeling

    Ingemar J. Cox;Matthew L. Miller

  • Synergistic Face Detection and Pose Estimation with Energy-Based Models

    Margarita Osadchy;Yann Le Cun;Matthew L. Miller

  • Watermarking applications and their properties

    I.J. Cox;M.L. Miller;J.A. Bloom

  • Copy protection for DVD video

    J.A. Bloom;I.J. Cox;T. Kalker;J.-P.M.G. Linnartz

  • Applying informed coding and embedding to design a robust high-capacity watermark

    M.L. Miller;G.J. Doerr;I.J. Cox

  • PicHunter: Bayesian relevance feedback for image retrieval

    I.J. Cox;M.L. Miller;S.M. Omohundro;P.N. Yianilos

  • Chapter 12 – Steganography

    Ingemar J. Cox;Matthew L. Miller;Jeffrey A. Bloom;Jessica Fridrich

  • Method for data preparation and watermark insertion

    Jeffrey A. Bloom;Ingemar J. Cox;Matthew L. Miller

  • Rotation, scale, and translation resilient public watermarking for images

    Jeffrey A Bloom;Ingemar J Cox;Matthew L Miller;Min Wu

  • A Review of of Watermarking Principles and Practices

    IJ Cox;ML Miller;Jmg Linnartz;T Kalker

  • Optimizing Murty's ranked assignment method

    M.L. Miller;H.S. Stone;I.J. Cox

  • 8 – Robust Watermarking

    Ingemar J. Cox;Matthew L. Miller;Jeffrey A. Bloom

  • An optimized interaction strategy for Bayesian relevance feedback

    I.J. Cox;M.L. Miller;T.P. Minka;P.N. Yianilos

  • Synergistic Face Detection and Pose Estimation with Energy-Based Models

    Margarita Osadchy;Matthew L. Miller;Yann L. Cun

  • Synergistic face detection and pose estimation with energy-based models

    Margarita Osadchy;Yann LeCun;Matthew L. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Ingemar J. Cox
Ingemar J. Cox University College London
Ton Kalker
Ton Kalker Hewlett-Packard (United States)
Jessica Fridrich
Jessica Fridrich Binghamton University
Min Wu
Min Wu University of Maryland, College Park
Kartik Ramaswamy
Kartik Ramaswamy Applied Materials (United States)
Ching-Yung Lin
Ching-Yung Lin National Chi Nan University
Tom Minka
Tom Minka Microsoft (United States)
Andrew Nguyen
Andrew Nguyen Applied Materials (United States)
Hiroji Hanawa
Hiroji Hanawa Applied Materials (United States)
Kenneth S. Collins
Kenneth S. Collins Applied Materials (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering online education in computer science and related fields opens up a world of opportunity—both academically and professionally. For those concerned about affordability, exploring the cheapest online college options is a smart first step. These institutions offer quality programs at a fraction of the cost, making higher education accessible to more students.

If your academic record isn’t perfect, don’t worry. Many of the best colleges for low gpa applicants offer comprehensive online programs, so you can advance your skills without high barriers to entry.

Computer science graduates often find high-paying positions in tech, but other pathways also exist. For instance, careers stemming from an environmental science degree are expanding, with roles in data analysis, sustainability, and research. Learn more about high-paying jobs with environmental science degree backgrounds for additional possibilities.

If you’re eager to complete your education quickly, some of the accelerated computer science degree online options allow you to earn your diploma in less time, ultimately speeding up your entry into today’s dynamic tech workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew L. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles