World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
10483
World Ranking
9100
National Ranking
3868

Bruce L. Davis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce L. Davis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 94 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bruce L. Davis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce L. Davis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • The Internet
  • Artificial intelligence
  • World Wide Web

Bruce L. Davis mainly investigates Multimedia, World Wide Web, Artificial intelligence, Computer vision and Encoding. As part of his studies on Multimedia, Bruce L. Davis often connects relevant areas like Metadata. The study incorporates disciplines such as Watermark and Signal, Decodes in addition to Metadata.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Identifier, Data store and Disk storage. His work on Tracking, Visual saliency and Geometric primitive as part of general Artificial intelligence study is frequently linked to Process, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Identification and Computer vision.

His most cited work include:

  • Smartphone-based methods and systems (649 citations)
  • Media processing methods and arrangements (539 citations)
  • Integrating digital watermarks in multimedia content (525 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Bruce L. Davis spends much of his time researching Multimedia, Watermark, Variety, Artificial intelligence and Digital watermarking. His work on Media content as part of general Multimedia research is frequently linked to Phone, bridging the gap between disciplines. His work in Watermark tackles topics such as Decodes which are related to areas like Media type.

His Variety study incorporates themes from Data store and World Wide Web. His Artificial intelligence research incorporates elements of Detector, Computer vision and Pattern recognition. His research in Digital watermarking intersects with topics in Object, Payload, Computer network and Steganography.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Multimedia (41.30%)
  • Watermark (22.83%)
  • Variety (19.57%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?

  • Artificial intelligence (19.57%)
  • Phone (14.13%)
  • Computer vision (17.39%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Artificial intelligence, Phone, Computer vision, Information retrieval and Multimedia. His study in Artificial intelligence is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Computer graphics and Pattern recognition. His work in the fields of Computer vision, such as Visual saliency, Geometric primitive and Tracking, overlaps with other areas such as Art.

The Multimedia study combines topics in areas such as Watermark, Decoding methods and Signal processing. Bruce L. Davis combines subjects such as Data migration, Brick and mortar, Encoding and Mobile phone with his study of Variety. His work investigates the relationship between Identification and topics such as Object that intersect with problems in Audio signal.

Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Methods and arrangements for identifying objects (459 citations)
  • Mobile device indoor navigation (166 citations)
  • Second screen methods and arrangements (134 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • The Internet
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Database

Bruce L. Davis focuses on Multimedia, Microphone, Phone, Identification and Computer resources. His study in the fields of Media content under the domain of Multimedia overlaps with other disciplines such as Tv watching. His work carried out in the field of Microphone brings together such families of science as Real-time computing, Computer hardware, Output device and Mobile device.

By researching both Phone and Touchscreen, Bruce L. Davis produces research that crosses academic boundaries. His research integrates issues of Visual saliency and Geometric primitive, Computer vision, Artificial intelligence in his study of Identification. Among his research on Computer resources, you can see a combination of other fields of science like Service, Resource and World Wide Web.

Best Publications

  • Smartphone-based methods and systems

    Bruce L. Davis;Tony F. Rodriguez;Geoffrey B. Rhoads;William Y. Conwell

  • Authenticating metadata and embedding metadata in watermarks of media signals

    Bruce L. Davis;Geoffrey B. Rhoads;William Y. Conwell

  • Methods and arrangements for identifying objects

    Bruce L. Davis;John D. Lord;yang Bai;William Y. Conwell

  • Associating data with images in imaging systems

    Bruce L. Davis;Geoffrey B. Rhoads

  • Media processing methods and arrangements

    Bruce L. Davis;Tony F. Rodriguez

  • Integrating digital watermarks in multimedia content

    Bruce L. Davis;Tony F. Rodriguez;Geoffrey B. Rhoads

  • Portable devices and methods employing digital watermarking

    Geoffrey B. Rhoads;Bruce L. Davis;Douglas B. Evans

  • Controlling operation of a device using a re-configurable watermark detector

    Geoffrey B. Rhoads;Bruce L. Davis;J. Scott Carr

  • Sensor-based mobile search, related methods and systems

    Geoffrey B. Rhoads;Tony F. Rodriguez;Gilbert B. Shaw;Bruce L. Davis

  • Watermarked business cards and methods

    Tony F. Rodriguez;Geoffrey B. Rhoads;Bruce L. Davis;J. Scott Carr

  • Mobile device indoor navigation

    Bruce L. Davis;Tony F. Rodriguez;Shankar Thagadur Shivappa

  • Methods and systems for controlling computers or linking to internet resources from physical and electronic objects

    Geoffrey B. Rhoads;Tony F. Rodriguez;Bruce L. Davis;J. Scott Carr

  • Advertising employing watermarking

    Tony F. Rodriguez;Geoffey B. Rhoads;J. Scott Carr;Bruce L. Davis

  • System for linking from objects to remote resources

    Geoffrey B. Rhoads;Bruce L. Davis;William C. Hein;Joshua A. Rosenthol

  • Embedding and reading imperceptible codes on objects

    Bruce L. Davis;Geoffrey B. Rhoads

  • Second screen methods and arrangements

    Bruce L. Davis;Tony F. Rodriguez

  • Enhanced input peripheral

    Bruce L. Davis;Geoffrey B. Rhoads;Phillip Andrew Seder

  • Methods and arrangements for smartphone payments

    Bruce L. Davis;Tony F. Rodriguez

  • Content Interaction Methods and Systems Employing Portable Devices

    Bruce L. Davis;Tony F. Rodriguez;Brian T. Macintosh;William Y. Conwell

  • Methods and systems for obtaining still images corresponding to video

    Bruce L. Davis;Tony F. Rodriguez;Edward B. Knudson

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey B. Rhoads
Geoffrey B. Rhoads Digimarc (United States)
Tony F. Rodriguez
Tony F. Rodriguez Digimarc (United States)
Alastair M. Reed
Alastair M. Reed International Centre for Counter-Terrorism

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA often leads students to consider additional study options and varied career paths. One important factor for future professionals is choosing a field with strong job growth and relevance. If you are looking to maximize your employability and earnings, reviewing the best majors for the future can provide valuable insight.

For those aiming to boost their credentials while managing other life commitments, it’s worth investigating the easiest online masters degree programs. These can offer flexibility and a faster track toward advanced roles.

Cost is another crucial consideration. If affordability is a priority, make sure to explore the affordable phd programs online for doctoral studies in tech-related fields.

Educators looking to move up in leadership may prefer short, affordable doctorate options. There are programs recognized as the cheapest edd degrees that still offer solid academic and career outcomes.

By understanding your options, you can tailor your education to fit your career goals and budget as you pursue Computer Science and related opportunities in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce L. Davis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles