World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
5201
World Ranking
13943
National Ranking
271

Alastair M. Reed publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alastair M. Reed sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 86 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alastair M. Reed D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alastair M. Reed sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alastair M. Reed is affiliated with the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple fields including Computer Science, Physics and Astronomy, and Engineering, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach.

The scientist's work covers several subfields, notably Information Systems, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. These subfields align with their broader engagement across technical and applied scientific domains.

Research topics addressed by Alastair M. Reed include:

  • QR Code Applications and Technologies
  • Color Science and Applications
  • Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

Their publication record includes work in the venue Electronic Imaging, where they published a paper in 2020 titled "Using watermark visibility measurements to select an optimized pair of spot colors for use in a binary watermark".

Frequent collaborators in the scientist's research activities are:

  • Vlado Kitanovski
  • Kristyn Falkenstern
  • Marius Pedersen

The collaboration with these coauthors indicates an interconnected research network focused on topics relevant to imaging and applied sciences. This network likely supports multidisciplinary projects at the intersection of information systems, physics, and engineering applications.

Best Publications

  • Smartphone-based methods and systems

    Bruce L. Davis;Tony F. Rodriguez;Geoffrey B. Rhoads;William Y. Conwell

  • Methods and arrangements for identifying objects

    Bruce L. Davis;John D. Lord;yang Bai;William Y. Conwell

  • Low visibility watermarks using an out-of-phase color

    Alastair M. Reed;Brett A. Bradley

  • Automated methods for distinguishing copies from original printed objects

    Tony F. Rodriguez;Alastair M. Reed;Ravi K. Sharma;Osama M. Alattar

  • Document management with embedded data

    Burt Perry;Sean Calhoon;Alastair Reed;Kenneth Levy

  • Digital watermarking methods, programs and apparatus

    Tony F. Rodriguez;John Stach;Alastair M. Reed

  • Fragile and emerging digital watermarks

    Alastair M. Reed;Tony F. Rodriguez;Ravi K. Sharma

  • Low visible digital watermarks

    Alastair Reed;Trent Brundage

  • Parallel processing of digital watermarking operations

    Tyler J. McKinley;William C. Hein;Tony F. Rodriguez;Alastair M. Reed

  • Metadata management and generation using digital watermarks

    Tony Rodriguez;Sean Calhoon;Alastair Reed

  • Perceptual modeling of media signals based on local contrast and directional edges

    Brett T. Hannigan;Alastair M. Reed;Brett Alan Bradley

  • Physiologic data acquisition and analysis

    Bruce L. Davis;Tony F. Rodriguez;Alastair M. Reed;John Stach

  • Hiding information out-of-phase in color channels

    Alastair M. Reed;Trent J. Brundage

  • Enhancing embedding of out-of-phase signals

    Alastair M. Reed;Brett T. Hannigan;Trent J. Brundage

  • Detecting information hidden out-of-phase in color channels

    Alastair M. Reed;Trent J. Brundage;Jeremy Cattone

  • Coordinated illumination and image signal capture for enhanced signal detection

    Jacob L. Boles;Alastair M. Reed;John D. Lord

  • Embedding digital watermarks in spot colors

    Osama M. Alattar;Alastair M. Reed;Trent J. Brundage

  • Data hiding for spot colors in product packaging

    Alastair M. Reed;Tomas Filler;Kristyn R. Falkenstern;Yang Bai

  • Full-color visibility model using csf which varies spatially with local luminance

    Alastair M. Reed;Kristyn R. Falkenstern;David Berfanger;Yang Bai

  • Watermarking an image in color plane separations and detecting such watermarks

    Tony Rodriguez;Ammon Gustafson;Marc Miller;Alastair M. Reed

Frequent Co-Authors

Tony F. Rodriguez
Tony F. Rodriguez Digimarc (United States)
Geoffrey B. Rhoads
Geoffrey B. Rhoads Digimarc (United States)
Bruce L. Davis
Bruce L. Davis University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s valuable to look at the broader landscape of online degree and career options. Today’s job market rewards those with in-demand skills and credentials, making it essential to explore the best college degrees for future-proof career opportunities.

Online learning offers flexibility for working professionals, and you might be interested in finding the easiest online masters degree programs that allow you to upskill without compromising on your current responsibilities. Likewise, pursuing advanced research paths is now more accessible, thanks to options like affordable phd programs in technology and related fields.

For those interested in education leadership within STEM or computer science, there are also cheapest ed.d online program choices available. Exploring these avenues can help you tailor your educational journey to your career goals—while keeping both your time and budget in mind.

Best Scientists Citing Alastair M. Reed

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles