World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jean-Luc Dugelay

Jean-Luc Dugelay

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 43 7910 7683 181 176 313 8793

Jean-Luc Dugelay publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jean-Luc Dugelay between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jean-Luc Dugelay published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2012. 23 of the 335 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2012. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 14 publications
1988 2025

335 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jean-Luc Dugelay: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 2
1992 2
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 5
1997 2
1998 4
1999 12
2000 10
2001 6
2002 9
2003 13
2004 14
2005 11
2006 12
2007 5
2008 10
2009 8
2010 13
2011 21
2012 25
2013 18
2014 15
2015 11
2016 9
2017 12
2018 13
2019 13
2020 5
2021 9
2022 13
2023 7
2024 9
2025 14
Total 335
Download as CSV

Jean-Luc Dugelay publications per year - data summary

  • Jean-Luc Dugelay, a Computer Science scholar from EURECOM, has 335 publications recorded across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1988 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2012, with 25 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1988, with 1 publication.
  • 4 of the 38 years in the span carry no publications at all (1989, 1990, 1993 and 1994).
  • The rate of publication averages 8.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.9 per year counting only the 34 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 52 publications, 16% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1988-2000: 40 publications (3.1 per year); 2001-2013: 165 publications (12.7 per year); 2014-2025: 130 publications (10.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Jean-Luc Dugelay publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Luc Dugelay sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 312–321 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 313 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238 313
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Jean-Luc Dugelay publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Jean-Luc Dugelay, a Computer Science scholar from EURECOM, records 313 publications - the 76th percentile of the discipline.
  • 76% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Jean-Luc Dugelay, and about 24% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Jean-Luc Dugelay ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Jean-Luc Dugelay D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Luc Dugelay sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821 43
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Jean-Luc Dugelay D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Jean-Luc Dugelay, a Computer Science scholar from EURECOM, records 43 D-Index - the 46th percentile of the discipline.
  • 46% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Jean-Luc Dugelay, and about 54% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Jean-Luc Dugelay ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the International Association for Pattern Recognition (IAPR) For contributions to face recognition and soft biometrics
  • 2012 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to three dimensional imaging for security applications

Overview

Jean-Luc Dugelay is affiliated with EURECOM in France and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, with a particular focus on computer vision and pattern recognition. Their work intersects multiple subfields including artificial intelligence, signal processing, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, as well as radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scientist's research topics encompass a range of areas including:

  • Face recognition and analysis
  • Digital media forensic detection
  • Advanced steganography and watermarking techniques
  • Adversarial robustness in machine learning
  • Generative adversarial networks and image synthesis
  • Biometric identification and security
  • Video surveillance and tracking methods

Jean-Luc Dugelay has authored several recent papers, illustrating their ongoing research interests. Notable publications include:

  • "Adversarial attacks through architectures and spectra in face recognition," 2021, Pattern Recognition Letters
  • "Generalizing Adversarial Explanations with Grad-CAM," 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
  • "Improving Deepfake Detection by Mixing Top Solutions of the DFDC," 2022, 2022 30th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)
  • "PROTECT: Pervasive and useR fOcused biomeTrics bordEr projeCT - a case study," 2020, IET Biometrics
  • "AI-Based Compression: A New Unintended Counter Attack on JPEG-Related Image Forensic Detectors?," 2022, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Nélida Mirabet-Herranz
  • Khawla Mallat
  • Chiara Galdi
  • Mira Adra
  • Tanmay Chakraborty

Their work is frequently published in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Pattern Recognition Letters
  • 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
  • 2022 30th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)
  • IET Biometrics

Jean-Luc Dugelay has been recognized with several awards, including being named Fellow of the International Association for Pattern Recognition (IAPR) in 2018 for contributions to face recognition and soft biometrics. They were also awarded IEEE Fellow status in 2012 for contributions to three-dimensional imaging for security applications.

Best Publications

  • Face aging with conditional generative adversarial networks

    Grigory Antipov;Moez Baccouche;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • A guide tour of video watermarking

    Gwenaël J. Doërr;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • Digital image forensics: a booklet for beginners

    Judith A. Redi;Wiem Taktak;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • A survey of watermarking algorithms for image authentication

    Christian Rey;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • KinectFaceDB: A Kinect Database for Face Recognition

    Rui Min;Neslihan Kose;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • Bag of soft biometrics for person identification

    Antitza Dantcheva;Carmelo Velardo;Angela D'Angelo;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • Security pitfalls of frame-by-frame approaches to video watermarking

    G. Doerr;J.-L. Dugelay

  • Reversible Image Data Hiding with Contrast Enhancement

    Hao Tian Wu;Jean Luc Dugelay;Yun Qing Shi

  • Improving the recognition of faces occluded by facial accessories

    Rui Min;Abdenour Hadid;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • An efficient LBP-Based descriptor for facial depth images applied to gender recognition using RGB-D face data

    Tri Huynh;Rui Min;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • Moving face spoofing detection via 3D projective invariants

    Maria De Marsico;Michele Nappi;Daniel Riccio;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • Minimalistic CNN-based ensemble model for gender prediction from face images

    Grigory Antipov;Sid-Ahmed Berrani;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • Learned vs. Hand-Crafted Features for Pedestrian Gender Recognition

    Grigory Antipov;Sid-Ahmed Berrani;Natacha Ruchaud;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • Effective training of convolutional neural networks for face-based gender and age prediction

    Grigory Antipov;Moez Baccouche;Sid-Ahmed Berrani;Jean Luc Dugelay

  • Autonomous drones for assisting rescue services within the context of natural disasters

    Ludovic Apvrille;Tullio Tanzi;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • Apparent Age Estimation from Face Images Combining General and Children-Specialized Deep Learning Models

    Grigory Antipov;Moez Baccouche;Sid-Ahmed Berrani;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • DEFACTO: Image and Face Manipulation Dataset

    Gael Mahfoudi;Badr Tajini;Florent Retraint;Frederic Morain-Nicolier

  • A subspace co-training framework for multi-view clustering

    Xuran Zhao;Nicholas Evans;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • Classification of captured and recaptured images to detect photograph spoofing

    Neslihan Kose;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • Multimodal authentication on smartphones

    Chiara Galdi;Michele Nappi;Jean-Luc Dugelay

  • Still-image watermarking robust to local geometric distortions

    J.-L. Dugelay;S. Roche;C. Rey;G. Doerr

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth Rose
Kenneth Rose University of California, Santa Barbara
Michele Nappi
Michele Nappi University of Salerno
Touradj Ebrahimi
Touradj Ebrahimi École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Abdenour Hadid
Abdenour Hadid University of Oulu
Thomas Sikora
Thomas Sikora Technical University of Berlin
Mohamed Daoudi
Mohamed Daoudi IMT Nord Europe
Christoph Busch
Christoph Busch Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Christine Guillemot
Christine Guillemot French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Liming Chen
Liming Chen École Centrale de Lyon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career paths. If you’re looking to quickly boost your credentials, it’s possible to find what degree can I get online in 6 months. These programs provide fast, flexible ways to enter the tech industry or build up your skills for a new job opportunity.

For those interested in business or analytics, an online business degree with financial aid can offer affordable pathways into management, entrepreneurship, and leadership roles. Additionally, there are numerous cheap online universities that make gaining a bachelor’s degree more accessible, especially for working adults or budget-conscious students.

Computer science backgrounds also pair well with technical options. Consider online engineering degree programs to expand your technical expertise and advance in specialized fields such as software engineering, robotics, or data science. These alternative online pathways can help you customize your learning and career journey in the rapidly evolving tech sector.

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Luc Dugelay

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles