World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
7833
World Ranking
8779
National Ranking
3753

Georgia D. Tourassi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Georgia D. Tourassi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 249 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Georgia D. Tourassi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Georgia D. Tourassi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2017 - SPIE Fellow
  • 2015 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Georgia D. Tourassi is affiliated with Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the United States. Their research spans the intersection of computer science, biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence and its applications in healthcare and biomedical domains.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Within these fields, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Molecular Biology
  • Health Informatics
  • Biophysics
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Their research covers a variety of topics, notably:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Georgia D. Tourassi has produced numerous publications, with frequent contributions to the following journals and venues:

  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Medical Physics
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by them include:

  • "Artificial intelligence in cancer research, diagnosis and therapy," 2021, Nature reviews. Cancer
  • "Diversity and scale: Genetic architecture of 2068 traits in the VA Million Veteran Program," 2024, Science
  • "Limitations of Transformers on Clinical Text Classification," 2021, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
  • "AAPM task group report 273: Recommendations on best practices for AI and machine learning for computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging," 2022, Medical Physics
  • "Class imbalance in out-of-distribution datasets: Improving the robustness of the TextCNN for the classification of rare cancer types," 2021, Journal of Biomedical Informatics

The scientist has collaborated extensively with peers, including frequent co-authors such as:

  • Eric B. Durbin
  • Linda Coyle
  • Jennifer A. Doherty
  • Xiao-Cheng Wu
  • Antoinette M. Stroup

Georgia D. Tourassi has been recognized by several professional organizations, being awarded the Fellowships of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2020, SPIE Fellow in 2017, and Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 2015.

Best Publications

  • 2008 Special Issue: Training neural network classifiers for medical decision making: The effects of imbalanced datasets on classification performance

    Maciej A. Mazurowski;Piotr A. Habas;Jacek M. Zurada;Joseph Y. Lo

  • Training neural network classifiers for medical decision making: The effects of imbalanced datasets on classification performance

    Maciej A. Mazurowski;Piotr A. Habas;Jacek M. Zurada;Joseph Y. Lo

  • Medical Imaging 2015: Computer-Aided Diagnosis

    Lubomir M. Hadjiiski;Georgia D. Tourassi

  • Application of the mutual information criterion for feature selection in computer-aided diagnosis.

    Georgia D. Tourassi;Erik D. Frederick;Mia K. Markey;Carey E. Floyd

  • Journey toward computer-aided diagnosis: role of image texture analysis.

    Georgia D. Tourassi

  • Recent Advances in Chest Radiography

    H. Page McAdams;Ehsan Samei;James Dobbins;Georgia D. Tourassi

  • A Concentric Morphology Model for the Detection of Masses in Mammography

    N.H. Eltonsy;G.D. Tourassi;A.S. Elmaghraby

  • Artificial intelligence in cancer research, diagnosis and therapy

    Olivier Elemento;Christina Leslie;Johan Lundin;Johan Lundin;Georgia Tourassi

  • Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information.

    Georgia D. Tourassi;Rene Vargas-Voracek;David M. Catarious;Carey E. Floyd

  • Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems

    Nicholas Petrick;Berkman Sahiner;Samuel G. Armato;Alberto Bert

  • Use of Natural Language Processing to Extract Clinical Cancer Phenotypes from Electronic Medical Records

    Guergana K Savova;Ioana Danciu;Folami Alamudun;Timothy Miller;Timothy Miller

  • Self-organizing map for cluster analysis of a breast cancer database

    Mia K. Markey;Joseph Y. Lo;Georgia D. Tourassi;Carey E. Floyd

  • Transforming Epidemiology for 21st Century Medicine and Public Health

    Muin J. Khoury;Tram Kim Lam;John P.A. Ioannidis;Patricia Hartge

  • Deep Learning for Automated Extraction of Primary Sites From Cancer Pathology Reports

    John X. Qiu;Hong-Jun Yoon;Paul A. Fearn;Georgia D. Tourassi

  • Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms.

    Georgia D. Tourassi;Brian Harrawood;Swatee Singh;Joseph Y. Lo

  • Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data.

    Christina M. Li;W. Paul Segars;Georgia D. Tourassi;John M. Boone

  • Hierarchical attention networks for information extraction from cancer pathology reports.

    Shang Gao;Michael T Young;John X Qiu;Hong-Jun Yoon

  • Limitations of Transformers on Clinical Text Classification

    Shang Gao;Mohammed Alawad;M. Todd Young;John Gounley

  • LUNGx Challenge for computerized lung nodule classification.

    Samuel G. Armato;Karen Drukker;Feng Li;Lubomir Hadjiiski

  • Acute pulmonary embolism: artificial neural network approach for diagnosis.

    G D Tourassi;C E Floyd;H D Sostman;R E Coleman

  • A study on the computerized fractal analysis of architectural distortion in screening mammograms.

    Georgia D Tourassi;David M Delong;Carey E Floyd

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph Y. Lo
Joseph Y. Lo Duke University
Maciej A. Mazurowski
Maciej A. Mazurowski Duke University
Jacek M. Zurada
Jacek M. Zurada University of Louisville
Jennifer A. Doherty
Jennifer A. Doherty University of Utah
Ehsan Samei
Ehsan Samei Duke University
Lubomir M. Hadjiiski
Lubomir M. Hadjiiski University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Amy C. Justice
Amy C. Justice Yale University
Elizabeth A. Krupinski
Elizabeth A. Krupinski Emory University
Rick Stevens
Rick Stevens Argonne National Laboratory
J. Michael Gaziano
J. Michael Gaziano Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up several connected academic and professional options. If you're considering a related field, you might look into electrical engineering degree online admissions. This pathway often overlaps with computer science and can lead to dynamic tech roles.

For those focused on a quick career boost, pursuing certifications that pay well can provide specialized skills valued by employers. Such credentials can be completed faster than traditional degrees and improve job prospects in areas like cybersecurity and IT support.

Students who want to accelerate their education may be interested in the quickest masters degree online programs. These are designed for motivated learners aiming to earn a graduate qualification in a short time frame.

Finally, consider researching the most valuable masters degrees that align with current job market needs. These degrees frequently result in high employability and salary growth, helping you advance your tech career with practical expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Georgia D. Tourassi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles