World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 58 10806 9757 2970 2439 200 10046

Robert M. Enick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert M. Enick between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert M. Enick published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2012. 7 of the 225 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2012. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
1982 2025

225 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert M. Enick: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 1
1986 3
1987 2
1988 5
1989 3
1990 2
1991 4
1992 4
1993 8
1994 4
1995 3
1996 4
1997 2
1998 4
1999 6
2000 4
2001 5
2002 7
2003 8
2004 8
2005 6
2006 3
2007 10
2008 5
2009 6
2010 8
2011 5
2012 14
2013 7
2014 9
2015 3
2016 11
2017 5
2018 7
2019 7
2020 6
2021 2
2022 10
2023 5
2024 5
2025 2
Total 225
Download as CSV

Robert M. Enick publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Enick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 200 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344 200
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert M. Enick D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Enick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930 58
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert M. Enick is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research is focused primarily within the field of Engineering, with a notable emphasis on subfields such as Ocean Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Environmental Engineering, and Materials Chemistry.

The main topics of their work include enhanced oil recovery techniques, hydraulic fracturing and reservoir analysis, CO2 sequestration and geologic interactions, phase equilibria and thermodynamics, innovative microfluidic and catalytic techniques innovation, hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, and carbon dioxide capture technologies.

Frequent publication venues for Enick's research include Energy & Fuels, Chemical Engineering Journal, SSRN Electronic Journal, Fuel, and SPE Journal.

Frequent collaborators include Deepak Tapriyal, Peter Charles Lemaire, Lauren Burrows, Foad Haeri, and Angela Goodman.

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Robert M. Enick are as follows:

  • A Literature Review of CO2, Natural Gas, and Water-Based Fluids for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Unconventional Reservoirs, 2020, Energy & Fuels
  • Thickening CO2 with Direct Thickeners, CO2-in-Oil Emulsions, or Nanoparticle Dispersions: Literature Review and Experimental Validation, 2021, Energy & Fuels
  • The effect of CO2-philic thickeners on gravity drainage mechanism in gas invaded zone, 2022, Fuel
  • Decreasing Asphaltene Precipitation and Deposition during Immiscible Gas Injection Via the Introduction of a CO2-Soluble Asphaltene Inhibitor, 2023, SPE Journal
  • Enhanced oil recovery via dissolution of low molecular weight PDMS in CO2 during immiscible gas injection in matrix-fracture system, 2024, Process Safety and Environmental Protection

Best Publications

  • The permeability of hydrogen in bulk palladium at elevated temperatures and pressures

    Bryan D. Morreale;Michael V. Ciocco;Robert M. Enick;Badi I. Morsi

  • CO2 SOLUBILITY IN WATER AND BRINE UNDER RESERVOIR CONDITIONS

    R. M. Enick

  • Mobility and Conformance Control for CO2 EOR via Thickeners, Foams, and Gels -- A Literature Review of 40 Years of Research and Pilot Tests

    Robert Michael Enick;David Kenneth Olsen;James Robert Ammer;William Schuller

  • Microemulsions in near-critical and supercritical carbon dioxide

    T.A. Hoefling;R.M. Enick;E.J. Beckman

  • High-Temperature Kinetics of the Homogeneous Reverse Water-Gas Shift Reaction

    F. Bustamante;R. M. Enick;A.V. Cugini;R. P. Killmeyer

  • A Literature Review of CO2, Natural Gas, and Water-Based Fluids for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Unconventional Reservoirs

    Lauren C. Burrows;Lauren C. Burrows;Foad Haeri;Foad Haeri;Patricia Cvetic;Patricia Cvetic;Sean Sanguinito;Sean Sanguinito

  • Hydrogen permeance of palladium–copper alloy membranes over a wide range of temperatures and pressures

    B.H Howard;R.P Killmeyer;K.S Rothenberger;A.V Cugini

  • The Gelation of CO(2): A Sustainable Route to the Creation of Microcellular Materials.

    C. Shi;Z. Huang;S. Kilic;J. Xu

  • CO2-solubility of oligomers and polymers that contain the carbonyl group

    Z Shen;M.A McHugh;J Xu;J Belardi

  • Uncatalyzed and wall‐catalyzed forward water–gas shift reaction kinetics

    F. Bustamante;R. M. Enick;R. P. Killmeyer;B. H. Howard

  • Effect of hydrogen-sulfide on the hydrogen permeance of palladium–copper alloys at elevated temperatures

    B.D Morreale;M.V Ciocco;B.H Howard;R.P Killmeyer

  • High pressure hydrogen permeance of porous stainless steel coated with a thin palladium film via electroless plating

    Kurt S. Rothenberger;Anthony V. Cugini;Bret H. Howard;Richard P. Killmeyer

  • The incorporation of a fluorinated ether functionality into a polymer or surfactant to enhance C02-solubility

    Tracy Hoefling;David Stofesky;Margaret Reid;Eric Beckman

  • Phase behavior of fluoroether-functional amphiphiles in supercritical carbon dioxide

    D.A. Newman;T.A. Hoefling;R.R. Beitle;E.J. Beckman

  • Enhancement of the Viscosity of Carbon Dioxide Using Styrene/Fluoroacrylate Copolymers

    Zhihua Huang;Chunmei Shi;Jianhang Xu;Sevgi Kilic

  • Effect of structure on the cloud-point curves of silicone-based amphiphiles in supercritical carbon dioxide

    T.A. Hoefling;D.A. Newman;R.M. Enick;E.J. Beckman

  • Designed CO2‐Philes Stabilize Water‐in‐Carbon Dioxide Microemulsions

    Julian Eastoe;Sarah Gold;Sarah Rogers;Paul Wyatt

  • Highly carbon dioxide soluble surfactants, dispersants and chelating agents

    A.V. Yazdi;C. Lepilleur;E.J. Singley;W. Liu

  • Effect of Grafted Lewis Base Groups on the Phase Behavior of Model Poly(dimethyl siloxanes) in CO2

    S. Kilic;S. Michalik;Y. Wang;J. K. Johnson

  • Design and synthesis of highly CO2-soluble surfactants and chelating agents

    T.A. Hoefling;R.R. Beitle;R.M. Enick;E.J. Beckman

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric J. Beckman
Eric J. Beckman University of Pittsburgh
Mark A. McHugh
Mark A. McHugh Virginia Commonwealth University
Julian Eastoe
Julian Eastoe University of Bristol
J. Karl Johnson
J. Karl Johnson University of Pittsburgh
Andrew D. Hamilton
Andrew D. Hamilton New York University
Sarah E. Rogers
Sarah E. Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Richard K. Heenan
Richard K. Heenan Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Josefa Fernández
Josefa Fernández University of Santiago de Compostela
Marc J. Assael
Marc J. Assael Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Angela Goodman
Angela Goodman National Energy Technology Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various specialized career paths that blend science with practical applications. For those interested in health and pharmaceuticals, becoming a pharmacist is a rewarding but time-intensive option. If you're curious about the educational timeline, you can learn how long does it take to become a pharmacist. This path requires advanced degrees and licensure but offers strong job stability.

If you prefer the sales side of healthcare, a career in pharmaceutical sales might be appealing. To understand the starting points and earning potential, explore insights on how to get into pharmaceutical sales. This career pairs scientific knowledge with interpersonal skills and often requires a degree in a related field.

For those fascinated by the forensic application of chemistry, pursuing a forensic science degree is a smart choice. Many affordable options are available online, making it easier to balance education with other commitments. Check out some of the forensic science online degree programs suited to your needs.

Careers in forensic science might also lead you to roles like autopsy technician, where attention to detail and scientific expertise are crucial. To get a clear picture of the profession, including compensation, see information on how much do autopsy techs make. This pathway complements a chemistry background with practical medical knowledge.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Enick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles