World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
48
Citations
7571
World Ranking
4657
National Ranking
1337

Quoc Phuc Nguyen publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Quoc Phuc Nguyen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 184 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Quoc Phuc Nguyen D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Quoc Phuc Nguyen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Quoc Phuc Nguyen is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Engineering, with specific focus on subfields such as Ocean Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Analytical Chemistry, and Environmental Engineering.

The main topics addressed in Nguyen's work include:

  • Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis
  • Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
  • Petroleum Processing and Analysis
  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions

Recent publications by Nguyen cover various aspects of oil recovery, surfactant adsorption, and field implementation of enhanced recovery methods. Examples include:

  • "Wettability Alteration and Adsorption of Mixed Nonionic and Anionic Surfactants on Carbonates," 2020, Langmuir
  • "Universal scaling of adsorption of nonionic surfactants on carbonates using cloud point temperatures," 2020, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
  • "Successful Field Implementation of CO2-Foam Injection for Conformance Enhancement in the EVGSAU Field in the Permian Basin," 2020, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference
  • "Laboratory Investigations on Field Gas Huff-n-Puff for Improving Oil Recovery in Eagle Ford ShaleEffect of Operating Conditions," 2021, Energy & Fuels
  • "Unconventional Reservoir Hydrocarbon-Gas Foam Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Pilot: Design, Implementation, and Performance Analysis," 2020, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering

Nguyen frequently collaborates with a group of coauthors, including:

  • Amit Katiyar
  • Chao-yu Sie
  • Matthew Monette
  • Dany Hachem
  • Oualid M'barki

The primary venues for Nguyen's publications reflect a focus on energy and petroleum engineering topics and include:

  • Energy & Fuels
  • Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
  • SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference
  • Fuel
  • SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition

Best Publications

  • A Systematic Laboratory Approach to Low-Cost, High-Performance Chemical Flooding

    Adam K. Flaaten;Quoc Phuc Nguyen;Gary A Pope;Jieyuan Zhang

  • Stability of aqueous silica nanoparticle dispersions

    Cigdem O. Metin;Larry W Lake;Caetano R. Miranda;Quoc Phuc Nguyen

  • Dynamic simulations with an improved model for foam generation

    Seung Ihl Kam;Quoc Phuc Nguyen;Qichong Li;William Richard Rossen

  • Mechanisms of Enhanced Natural Imbibition With Novel Chemicals

    Jieyuan Zhang;Quoc P. Nguyen;Adam Flaaten;Gary A. Pope

  • Morphology and stability of CO2-in-water foams with nonionic hydrocarbon surfactants.

    Stephanie S Adkins;Xi Chen;Isabel Chan;Enza Torino

  • Injection Strategies To Overcome Gravity Segregation in Simultaneous Gas and Water Injection Into Homogeneous Reservoirs

    William R. Rossen;C.J. van Duijn;Quoc P. Nguyen;C. Shen

  • Effect of branching on the interfacial properties of nonionic hydrocarbon surfactants at the air-water and carbon dioxide-water interfaces.

    Stephanie S. Adkins;Xi Chen;Quoc P. Nguyen;Aaron W. Sanders

  • Nanotechnology for oilfield applications: Challenges and impact

    Hon Chung Lau;Meng Yu;Quoc P. Nguyen

  • Modeling Low Salinity Waterflooding: Ion Exchange, Geochemistry and Wettability Alteration

    Cuong Thanh Quy Dang;Long X. Nghiem;Zhangxin John Chen;Quoc Phuc Nguyen

  • Adsorption of surface functionalized silica nanoparticles onto mineral surfaces and decane/water interface.

    Cigdem O. Metin;Jimmie R. Baran;Quoc P. Nguyen

  • Effect of silica nanoparticles on clay swelling and aqueous stability of nanoparticle dispersions

    Hieu Pham;Quoc Phuc Nguyen

  • Switchable Nonionic to Cationic Ethoxylated Amine Surfactants for CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery in High-Temperature, High-Salinity Carbonate Reservoirs

    Yunshen Chen;Amro S. Elhag;Benjamin M. Poon;Leyu Cui

  • Low-Cost, High-Performance Chemicals for Enhanced Oil Recovery

    Hyun Tae Yang;Christopher Britton;Pathma Jith Liyanage;Sriram Solairaj

  • Experimental and modeling studies on foam in porous media: a review

    Quoc Phuc Nguyen;Alexander V. Alexandrov;Pacelli L. Zitha;Peter K. Currie

  • Enhancing Hydrocarbon Permeability After Hydraulic Fracturing: Laboratory Evaluations of Shut-Ins and Surfactant Additives

    Tianbo Liang;Rafael A. Longoria;Jun Lu;Quoc P. Nguyen

  • Evaluation of wettability alteration and IFT reduction on mitigating water blocking for low-permeability oil-wet rocks after hydraulic fracturing

    Tianbo Liang;Fujian Zhou;Jun Lu;David DiCarlo

  • A Novel Foam Concept With CO2 Dissolved Surfactants

    Viet Quoc Le;Quoc Phuc Nguyen;Aaron Sanders

  • Mechanistic modeling of low salinity water flooding

    Cuong Dang;Long Nghiem;Ngoc Nguyen;Zhangxin Chen

  • Laboratory Investigation of Low-Tension-Gas Flooding for Improved Oil Recovery in Tight Formations

    Stefan M. Szlendak;Nhut M. Nguyen;Quoc P. Nguyen

  • CO2-in-Water Foam at Elevated Temperature and Salinity Stabilized with a Nonionic Surfactant with a High Degree of Ethoxylation

    Yunshen Chen;Amro S. Elhag;Leyu Cui;Andrew J. Worthen

  • ASP Chemical Flooding Without the Need for Soft Water

    Adam Flaaten;Quoc Phuc Nguyen;Jieyuan Zhang;Hourshad Mohammadi

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith P. Johnston
Keith P. Johnston The University of Texas at Austin
Gary A. Pope
Gary A. Pope The University of Texas at Austin
William R. Rossen
William R. Rossen Delft University of Technology
George J. Hirasaki
George J. Hirasaki Rice University
David A. DiCarlo
David A. DiCarlo The University of Texas at Austin
Pacelli L.J. Zitha
Pacelli L.J. Zitha Delft University of Technology
Roger T. Bonnecaze
Roger T. Bonnecaze The University of Texas at Austin
Zhangxin Chen
Zhangxin Chen University of Calgary
Matthew T. Balhoff
Matthew T. Balhoff The University of Texas at Austin
Pramod S. Patil
Pramod S. Patil D. Y. Patil Education Society, Kolhapur

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA often consider versatile online degree options that open doors to diverse industries. Pursuing a project manager degree online is an excellent choice for those drawn to leadership roles within tech-driven environments. With virtual collaboration and global teams growing in importance, these programs deliver relevant skills that employers seek.

For students interested in real estate development, infrastructure, or construction, there are specialized real estate degree programs available online. These pathways combine engineering fundamentals with business insight, ideal for those looking to bridge technical and managerial roles.

Another emerging field is digital interface design. By enrolling in a ux design online degree, learners develop critical skills in user-centered design and technology. This avenue is perfect for creative problem-solvers who want to enhance user experiences in digital products.

Career prospects and salaries vary by discipline and educational attainment. For example, reviewing project management degree salary data can help students understand the long-term value and earning potential of these online pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Quoc Phuc Nguyen

Trending Scientists