World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Angela Goodman publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela Goodman sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Angela Goodman D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela Goodman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide in Coal with Enhanced Coalbed Methane RecoveryA Review

    Unknown

  • U.S. DOE methodology for the development of geologic storage potential for carbon dioxide at the national and regional scale

    Angela Goodman;Alexandra Hakala;Grant Bromhal;Dawn Deel

  • A Literature Review of CO2, Natural Gas, and Water-Based Fluids for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Unconventional Reservoirs

    Lauren C. Burrows;Lauren C. Burrows;Foad Haeri;Foad Haeri;Patricia Cvetic;Patricia Cvetic;Sean Sanguinito;Sean Sanguinito

  • CO2 sequestration with brine solution and fly ashes

    Y. Soong;D.L. Fauth;B.H. Howard;J.R. Jones

  • A laboratory study of the heterogeneous reaction of nitric acid on calcium carbonate particles

    A. L. Goodman;G. M. Underwood;V. H. Grassian

  • An inter-laboratory comparison of CO2 isotherms measured on argonne premium coal samples

    A. L. Goodman;Andreas Busch;G. J. Duffy;J. E. Fitzgerald

  • Experimental and simulation studies on mineral trapping of CO2 with brine

    Y Soong;A.L Goodman;J.R McCarthy-Jones;J.P Baltrus

  • Inter-laboratory comparison II: CO2 isotherms measured on moisture-equilibrated Argonne premium coals at 55 °C and up to 15 MPa

    A. L. Goodman;Andreas Busch;R. M. Bustin;L. Chikatamarla

  • Direct evidence of carbon dioxide sorption on Argonne Premium Coals using attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

    Unknown

  • U.S. DOE NETL methodology for estimating the prospective CO2 storage resource of shales at the national and regional scale

    Unknown

  • Argonne Coal Structure Rearrangement Caused by Sorption of CO2

    Unknown

  • Characterization of Marcellus Shale and Huntersville Chert before and after exposure to hydraulic fracturing fluid via feature relocation using field-emission scanning electron microscopy

    Unknown

  • Investigating the role of water on CO2-Utica Shale interactions for carbon storage and shale gas extraction activities – Evidence for pore scale alterations

    Unknown

  • Characterization of coal before and after supercritical CO2 exposure via feature relocation using field-emission scanning electron microscopy

    Unknown

  • Quantifying dry supercritical CO2-induced changes of the Utica Shale

    Unknown

  • Structure Changes in Pittsburgh No. 8 Coal Caused by Sorption of CO2 Gas

    Unknown

  • Characterizing Hydrogen Storage Potential in U.S. Underground Gas Storage Facilities

    Unknown

  • Comparison of methods for geologic storage of carbon dioxide in saline formations

    Unknown

  • Molecular characterization of carbon dioxide, methane, and water adsorption in micropore space of kerogen matrix

    Unknown

  • Shale pore alteration: Potential implications for hydrocarbon extraction and CO2 storage

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens diverse educational and career opportunities, often complemented by related online degrees. For those interested in management roles within environmental organizations or research institutions, pursuing the best online masters degree in human resource management programs can provide essential leadership and organizational skills.

Seniors or career changers can also benefit from flexible learning options. Programs like the one year degree for seniors allow accelerated study, perfect for quickly gaining expertise without a long time commitment.

Additionally, Earth Science graduates interested in information and data management might consider further specialization. An online mlis degree ala accredited provides advanced knowledge for careers in managing scientific libraries or digital archives.

Complementing this, a library science masters offers skills valuable for curating geological and environmental data resources, enhancing the impact and accessibility of Earth Science research materials.

Recently Published Articles