World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
77
Citations
27873
World Ranking
1804
National Ranking
870

Stephan F. Taylor publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan F. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 286 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stephan F. Taylor D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan F. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephan F. Taylor is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within neuroscience, medicine, and psychology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to studying brain function and mental health.

Their primary fields of study include Neuroscience, Medicine, and Psychology. Subfields focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, Neurology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Stephan F. Taylor's work addresses several major research topics, notably:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neurological Disorders and Treatments

The scientist has published extensively in prominent venues, including:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Schizophrenia Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Clinical Neurophysiology

Recent publications highlight significant contributions to neuropsychiatric and brain stimulation research. Selected recent papers include:

  • Distinct Symptom-Specific Treatment Targets for Circuit-Based Neuromodulation (2020) in American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Brain Stimulation and Brain Lesions Converge on Common Causal Circuits in Neuropsychiatric Disease (2021) in Nature Human Behaviour
  • An Overview of the First 5 Years of the ENIGMA Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Working Group: The Power of Worldwide Collaboration (2020) in Human Brain Mapping
  • GABA Levels in Ventral Visual Cortex Decline with Age and Are Associated with Neural Distinctiveness (2021) in Neurobiology of Aging
  • Network Segregation Varies with Neural Distinctiveness in Sensorimotor Cortex (2020) in NeuroImage

Stephan F. Taylor collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Ivy F. Tso, Carly A Lasagna, Molly Simmonite, Thad A. Polk, and Joseph A. Himle, indicating a collaborative research network across related topics.

Best Publications

  • Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI.

    K. Luan Phan;Tor D. Wager;Stephan F. Taylor;Israel Liberzon

  • Valence, gender, and lateralization of functional brain anatomy in emotion: a meta-analysis of findings from neuroimaging.

    Tor D Wager;K.Luan Phan;Israel Liberzon;Stephan F Taylor

  • Brain activation in PTSD in response to trauma-related stimuli.

    Israel Liberzon;Stephan F Taylor;Richard Amdur;Tara D Jung

  • Context processing in older adults: evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging.

    Todd S. Braver;M Deanna;Beth A. Keys;Cameron S. Carter

  • Consensus Recommendations for the Clinical Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression

    Shawn M. McClintock;Shawn M. McClintock;Irving M. Reti;Linda L. Carpenter;William M. McDonald

  • Deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder

    James L. Abelson;George C. Curtis;Oren Sagher;Ronald C. Albucher

  • Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Human Emotions

    K. Luan Phan;Tor D. Wager;Stephan F. Taylor;Israel Liberzon

  • Facial expressions and complex IAPS pictures: common and differential networks.

    Jennifer C. Britton;Stephan F. Taylor;Keith D. Sudheimer;Israel Liberzon

  • Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a multisite, randomised, sham-controlled trial

    Paul E. Holtzheimer;Mustafa M. Husain;Mustafa M. Husain;Sarah H. Lisanby;Stephan F. Taylor

  • Neural correlates of individual ratings of emotional salience: a trial-related fMRI study

    K. Luan Phan;K. Luan Phan;Stephan F. Taylor;Robert C. Welsh;Shao Hsuan Ho

  • Brain mediators of cardiovascular responses to social threat: part I: Reciprocal dorsal and ventral sub-regions of the medial prefrontal cortex and heart-rate reactivity.

    Tor D. Wager;Christian E. Waugh;Martin A. Lindquist;Douglas C. Noll

  • Error-related hyperactivity of the anterior cingulate cortex in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Kate Dimond Fitzgerald;Robert C. Welsh;William J. Gehring;James L. Abelson

  • Subjective rating of emotionally salient stimuli modulates neural activity

    Stephan F Taylor;K.Luan Phan;Laura R Decker;Israel Liberzon;Israel Liberzon

  • Neural Systems for Error Monitoring: Recent Findings and Theoretical Perspectives

    Stephan F. Taylor;Emily R. Stern;William J. Gehring

  • Prospective Validation That Subgenual Connectivity Predicts Antidepressant Efficacy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sites.

    Anne Weigand;Andreas Horn;Ruth Caballero;Danielle Cooke

  • Neural correlates of social and nonsocial emotions: An fMRI study

    Jennifer C. Britton;K. Luan Phan;Stephan F. Taylor;Robert C. Welsh

  • Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of emotion perception and experience in schizophrenia.

    Stephan F. Taylor;Jian Kang;Inga S. Brege;Ivy F. Tso

  • Cerebral aging: integration of brain and behavioral models of cognitive function.

    Denise C. Park;Thad A. Polk;Joseph A. Mikels;Stephan F. Taylor

  • Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies

    Stephan F. Taylor;Sylvan Kornblum;Erick J. Lauber;Satoshi Minoshima

  • Corticolimbic blood flow in posttraumatic stress disorder during script-driven imagery

    Jennifer C. Britton;K. Luan Phan;Stephan F. Taylor;Lorraine M. Fig

Frequent Co-Authors

Israel Liberzon
Israel Liberzon Texas A&M University
Rajiv Tandon
Rajiv Tandon Western Michigan University
Robert C. Welsh
Robert C. Welsh University of Utah
Kate D. Fitzgerald
Kate D. Fitzgerald Columbia University
Robert A. Koeppe
Robert A. Koeppe University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
K. Luan Phan
K. Luan Phan The Ohio State University
James L. Abelson
James L. Abelson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mike Angstadt
Mike Angstadt University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jennifer C. Britton
Jennifer C. Britton University of Miami
Satoshi Minoshima
Satoshi Minoshima University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Stephan F. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles