World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4493 2494 146 21647

Shane J. Lopez publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shane J. Lopez between 1995 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shane J. Lopez published across 27 years, from 1995 to 2021, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2006. 2 of the 153 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2006. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 12 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication
1995 2021

153 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shane J. Lopez: publications per year, 1995 to 2021
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 4
1997 4
1998 5
1999 5
2000 8
2001 5
2002 6
2003 7
2004 3
2005 1
2006 12
2007 6
2008 8
2009 12
2010 10
2011 10
2012 5
2013 12
2014 9
2015 5
2016 2
2017 5
2018 2
2019 4
2020 1
2021 1
Total 153
Download as CSV

Shane J. Lopez publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shane J. Lopez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 146 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 146
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Shane J. Lopez D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shane J. Lopez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Shane J. Lopez was affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research spanned several fields, primarily within social sciences and computer science. The main subfields of their work included communication, gender studies, sociology and political science, as well as computer networks and communications.

The scientist's work focused on topics related to advertising and communication studies, media, gender, and advertising, conferences and exhibitions management, journalism and media studies, and media and digital communication.

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Shane J. Lopez, one notable publication was:

  • Digital transformation in the advertising industry from a gender perspective: an analysis of the top agencies (2020) published in El Profesional de la Informacion

Throughout their career, they frequently collaborated with several coauthors, including:

  • Natalia Papí-Gálvez
  • Alejandra Hernández Ruiz
  • Jesús Orbea Mira
  • Pablo Vizcaíno-Alcantud
  • Jesús López Ramón

Shane J. Lopez published mainly in the venue El Profesional de la Informacion among others, contributing to the academic discourse within their fields of study and topics of interest.

Best Publications

  • Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III

    Joseph J. Ryan;Shane J. Lopez

  • Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology

    Shane J. Lopez;C. R. Snyder

  • Positive Psychology: The Scientific and Practical Explorations of Human Strengths

    C. R. Snyder;Shane J. Lopez

  • The hierarchical structure of well-being.

    Matthew W. Gallagher;Shane J. Lopez;Kristopher J. Preacher

  • Hope Theory, Measurements, and Applications to School Psychology.

    C. R. Snyder;Shane J. Lopez;Hal S. Shorey;Kevin L. Rand

  • Oxford handbook of positive psychology, 2nd ed.

    Shane J. Lopez;C. R. Snyder

  • Positive expectancies and mental health: Identifying the unique contributions of hope and optimism

    Matthew W. Gallagher;Shane J. Lopez

  • “Building Hope for the Future”: A Program to Foster Strengths in Middle-School Students

    Susana C. Marques;Shane J. Lopez;J. L. Pais-Ribeiro

  • The Encyclopedia of Positive Psychology

    Shane J Lopez;Roni Reiter-Palmon

  • Causal Agency Theory: Reconceptualizing a Functional Model of Self-Determination.

    Karrie A. Shogren;Michael L. Wehmeyer;Susan B. Palmer;Anjali J. Forber-Pratt

  • Fostering a culture shift : Assessment of competence in the education and careers of professional psychologists

    Michael C. Roberts;Kathi A. Borden;Martha Dennis Christiansen;Shane J. Lopez

  • The role of positive psychology constructs in predicting life satisfaction in adolescents with and without cognitive disabilities: An exploratory study

    Karrie A. Shogren;Shane J. Lopez;Michael L. Wehmeyer;Todd D. Little

  • The Role of Positive Psychology Constructs in Predicting Mental Health and Academic Achievement in Children and Adolescents: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study

    Susana C. Marques;J. L. Pais-Ribeiro;Shane J. Lopez

  • Perceived Family Support, Acculturation, and Life Satisfaction in Mexican American Youth: A Mixed- Methods Exploration

    Lisa M. Edwards;Shane J. Lopez

  • Hope: Many definitions, many measures.

    Shane J. Lopez;C. R. Snyder;Jennifer Teramoto Pedrotti

  • Counseling Psychology's Focus on Positive Aspects of Human Functioning

    Shane J. Lopez;Jeana L. Magyar-Moe;Stephanie E. Petersen;Jamie A. Ryder

  • Age effects on Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III subtests.

    Joseph J Ryan;Jerome M Sattler;Shane J Lopez

  • Hope Therapy: Helping Clients Build a House of Hope

    Shane J. Lopez;R. Keith Floyd;John C. Ulven;C. R. Snyder

  • Striking a vital balance: Developing a complementary focus on human weakness and strength through positive psychological assessment.

    Shane J. Lopez;C. R. Snyder;Heather N. Rasmussen

  • Development of Self-Determination Through the Life-Course

    Michael L. Wehmeyer;Karrie A. Shogren;Todd D. Little;Shane J. Lopez

  • Positive Psychological Assessment: A Handbook of Models and Measures. Second Edition.

    Matthew W. Gallagher;Shane J. Lopez

Frequent Co-Authors

C. R. Snyder
C. R. Snyder University of Kansas
Matthew W. Gallagher
Matthew W. Gallagher University of Houston
Joseph J. Ryan
Joseph J. Ryan University of Central Missouri
Michael L. Wehmeyer
Michael L. Wehmeyer University of Kansas
Karrie A. Shogren
Karrie A. Shogren University of Kansas
James E. Maddux
James E. Maddux George Mason University
Lisa Y. Flores
Lisa Y. Flores University of Missouri
Todd D. Little
Todd D. Little Texas Tech University
John H. Harvey
John H. Harvey University of Iowa
Susan B. Palmer
Susan B. Palmer University of Kansas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online degree programs and professional opportunities, especially in fields such as social work, counseling, and mental health services. Understanding state requirements is crucial, as each state has its own educational pathways and licensing standards for social workers and related professionals.

For example, aspiring social workers should be aware of the Kansas education requirements for social workers, which specify the degrees necessary for different roles. Similarly, the Kentucky education requirements for social workers highlight specific coursework and supervised fieldwork needed for licensure.

Each state varies in its approach. For instance, social worker degree requirements in Louisiana may differ from licensure expectations elsewhere, affecting your pathway and preparation. If you’re considering practicing in the Northeast, it’s essential to review the social worker education requirements in Maine.

By researching these requirements and choosing accredited online programs, you can build a flexible career in psychology, social work, or counseling—no matter where you plan to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Shane J. Lopez

Recently Published Articles