What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Law
- Social psychology
- Social science
Corey L. M. Keyes spends much of his time researching Mental health, Well-being, Flourishing, Social psychology and Psychiatry.
His studies deal with areas such as Clinical psychology and Public health as well as Mental health.
His Well-being study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Life satisfaction, Optimism, Quality of life, Happiness and Personal development.
In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Social psychology, Social integration is strongly linked to Developmental psychology.
His Mental illness and Psychosocial investigations are all subjects of Psychiatry research.
His Subjective well-being study incorporates themes from Psychological well-being and Eudaimonia.
His most cited work include:
- The structure of psychological well-being revisited (4317 citations)
- The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. (1926 citations)
- Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. (1752 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Corey L. M. Keyes mostly deals with Mental health, Well-being, Flourishing, Developmental psychology and Clinical psychology.
Corey L. M. Keyes has included themes like Psychological intervention, Subjective well-being and Public health in his Mental health study.
His Well-being research incorporates elements of Social psychology and Quality of life.
His Flourishing research integrates issues from Promotion and Happiness.
His Mental illness research includes themes of Major depressive episode and Activities of daily living.
His research in the fields of Depression, Anxiety and Psychosocial overlaps with other disciplines such as Odds ratio.
He most often published in these fields:
- Mental health (50.99%)
- Well-being (23.18%)
- Flourishing (21.85%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?
- Mental health (50.99%)
- Flourishing (21.85%)
- Clinical psychology (19.21%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Mental health, Flourishing, Clinical psychology, Context and Mental illness.
His study with Mental health involves better knowledge in Psychiatry.
His Flourishing study results in a more complete grasp of Social psychology.
His study in the field of Psychological well-being is also linked to topics like Sexual minority.
His Construct validity course of study focuses on Measurement invariance and Developmental psychology.
Corey L. M. Keyes has researched Happiness in several fields, including Cross-cultural, Well-being and Value.
Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- The Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC–SF) as a Measure of Well-Being in the Italian Context (79 citations)
- The Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC–SF) in the Argentinean Context: Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Measurement Invariance (43 citations)
- Investigating the Goldilocks Hypothesis: The Non-Linear Impact of Positive Trait Change on Well-Being. (29 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- Social psychology
- Social science
His primary areas of study are Mental health, Flourishing, Psychiatry, Psychological intervention and Mental illness.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Confirmatory factor analysis, Construct validity and Clinical psychology.
His biological study deals with issues like Life satisfaction, which deal with fields such as Developmental psychology.
In general Psychiatry, his work in Anxiety disorder, Anxiety, Mood and Comorbidity is often linked to Odds ratio linking many areas of study.
His study in the fields of Mental health law under the domain of Psychological intervention overlaps with other disciplines such as Cohort.
Corey L. M. Keyes combines subjects such as Discriminant validity, Convergent validity and Exploratory factor analysis with his study of Mental illness.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
