World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mauro D'Amato

Mauro D'Amato

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
68
Citations
30924
World Ranking
7615
National Ranking
121

Mauro D'Amato publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mauro D'Amato sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 211 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mauro D'Amato D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mauro D'Amato sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mauro D'Amato is affiliated with Ikerbasque in Spain and has a significant body of research primarily focused on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work spans 154 publications in medicine and 75 in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with considerable contributions in related subfields such as genetics, gastroenterology, surgery, molecular biology, and physiology.

The researcher's main topics of interest include gastrointestinal motility and disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, digestive system and related health issues, diet and metabolism studies, microscopic colitis, gut microbiota and health, and Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies. These areas are reflected consistently in both their publication record and frequent research themes.

Mauro D'Amato has contributed articles to various scientific venues, with frequent publications appearing in Gastroenterology (18 publications), Journal of Crohn's and Colitis (13 publications), bioRxiv (12 publications), Gut (7 publications), and the United European Gastroenterology Journal (3 publications).

They have collaborated extensively with other researchers, with frequent co-authors including Jonas Halfvarson (27 collaborations), Dirk Repsilber (24 collaborations), André Franke (23 collaborations), Tenghao Zheng (22 collaborations), and Johan D. Söderholm (22 collaborations).

Among their recent important papers are:

  • Large-scale association analyses identify host factors influencing human gut microbiome composition (2021, Nature Genetics)
  • Longitudinal Multi-omics Reveals Subset-Specific Mechanisms Underlying Irritable Bowel Syndrome (2020, Cell)
  • European guidelines on microscopic colitis: United European Gastroenterology and European Microscopic Colitis Group statements and recommendations (2020, United European Gastroenterology Journal)
  • Intestinal Barrier and Permeability in Health, Obesity and NAFLD (2021, Biomedicines)
  • Large-scale association analyses identify host factors influencing human gut microbiome composition (2020, bioRxiv [Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory])

Best Publications

  • Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease

    Luke Jostins;Stephan Ripke;Rinse K Weersma;Richard H Duerr

  • Genome-wide meta-analysis increases to 71 the number of confirmed Crohn's disease susceptibility loci

    Andre Franke;Dermot P B McGovern;Jeffrey C. Barrett;Kai Wang

  • Genomewide Association Study of Severe Covid-19 with Respiratory Failure.

    David Ellinghaus;Frauke Degenhardt;Luis Bujanda;Maria Buti

  • Large-scale association analyses identify host factors influencing human gut microbiome composition

    Alexander Kurilshikov;Carolina Medina-Gomez;Rodrigo Bacigalupe;Djawad Radjabzadeh

  • Meta-analysis identifies 29 additional ulcerative colitis risk loci, increasing the number of confirmed associations to 47.

    Carl A. Anderson;Gabrielle Boucher;Charlie W. Lees;Andre Franke

  • Dynamics of the human gut microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease.

    Jonas Halfvarson;Colin J. Brislawn;Regina Lamendella;Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza

  • Deep resequencing of GWAS loci identifies independent rare variants associated with inflammatory bowel disease.

    Manuel A. Rivas;Manuel A. Rivas;Manuel A. Rivas;Mélissa Beaudoin;Agnes Gardet;Christine Stevens

  • Analysis of five chronic inflammatory diseases identifies 27 new associations and highlights disease-specific patterns at shared loci

    David Ellinghaus;Luke Jostins;Sarah L. Spain;Adrian Cortes

  • Genome-wide association identifies multiple ulcerative colitis susceptibility loci

    Dermot P.B. McGovern;Agnès Gardet;Leif Törkvist;Philippe Goyette

  • Genome-wide association analysis identifies variation in vitamin D receptor and other host factors influencing the gut microbiota

    Jun Wang;Louise B Thingholm;Jurgita Skiecevičienė;Philipp Rausch;Philipp Rausch

  • Fine-mapping inflammatory bowel disease loci to single-variant resolution

    Hailiang Huang;Hailiang Huang;Ming Fang;Luke Jostins;Maša Umićević Mirkov

  • Predominant T-helper 1 cytokine profile of hepatitis B virus nucleocapsid-specific T cells in acute self-limited hepatitis B

    A Penna;G Del Prete;A Cavalli;A Bertoletti

  • Drug repositioning: a machine-learning approach through data integration

    Francesco Napolitano;Yan Zhao;Vânia M Moreira;Roberto Tagliaferri

  • Longitudinal Multi-omics Reveals Subset-Specific Mechanisms Underlying Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

    Ruben A.T. Mars;Yi Yang;Tonya Ward;Mo Houtti

  • Detection of Celiac Disease and Lymphocytic Enteropathy by Parallel Serology and Histopathology in a Population-Based Study

    Marjorie M. Walker;Joseph A. Murray;Jukka Ronkainen;Pertti Aro

  • Relevance of residue 116 of HLA‐B27 in determining susceptibility to ankylosing spondylitis

    Mauro D'amato;Maria Teresa Fiorillo;Carlo Carcassi;Alessandro Mathieu

  • Integrative epigenome-wide analysis demonstrates that DNA methylation may mediate genetic risk in inflammatory bowel disease

    N. T. Ventham;N. A. Kennedy;A. T. Adams;R. Kalla

  • IBD risk loci are enriched in multigenic regulatory modules encompassing putative causative genes

    Yukihide Momozawa;Julia Dmitrieva;Emilie Théâtre;Valérie Deffontaine

  • Deep Resequencing of GWAS Loci Identifies Rare Variants in CARD9, IL23R and RNF186 That Are Associated with Ulcerative Colitis

    Mélissa Beaudoin;Philippe Goyette;Gabrielle Boucher;Ken Sin Lo

  • HLA-DQA1-HLA-DRB1 variants confer susceptibility to pancreatitis induced by thiopurine immunosuppressants

    Graham A Heap;Michael N Weedon;Claire M Bewshea;Abhey Singh

Frequent Co-Authors

Juha Kere
Juha Kere Karolinska Institute
Andre Franke
Andre Franke Kiel University
Jack Satsangi
Jack Satsangi University of Oxford
Mark J. Daly
Mark J. Daly Massachusetts General Hospital
John D. Rioux
John D. Rioux University of Montreal
Rinse K. Weersma
Rinse K. Weersma University Medical Center Groningen
Sven Pettersson
Sven Pettersson Karolinska Institute
Dermot P.B. McGovern
Dermot P.B. McGovern Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Erik Melén
Erik Melén Karolinska Institute
Richard H. Duerr
Richard H. Duerr University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Biology or Biochemistry can open diverse career pathways and online study options. Many students choose to broaden their scientific training with management skills by pursuing the cheapest online MBA in healthcare management. This affordable degree can lead to roles in hospital administration, research oversight, or biotech leadership.

Alternatively, some graduates opt for specialized certifications. When considering a future in medical data and coding, it’s important to understand the differences between ccs certification and other credentials. Each certification has distinct requirements, costs, and career opportunities.

Those interested in the medical coding field often want to know more about medical.coder salary prospects. Salaries can vary based on experience, certification, and region, with opportunities to advance as you gain skills.

Finally, if you're wondering about long-term stability, there’s ongoing debate about is medical coding a dying career. With healthcare’s reliance on accurate records, coding remains an important—though evolving—profession.

Best Scientists Citing Mauro D'Amato

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles