World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5081 4713 2788 2523 83 31305

Nansook Park publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nansook Park between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nansook Park published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2009. 2 of the 86 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2009. 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
2003 2025

86 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nansook Park: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 3
2004 5
2005 6
2006 9
2007 3
2008 7
2009 11
2010 6
2011 7
2012 7
2013 5
2014 8
2015 0
2016 2
2017 1
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 2
2022 0
2023 1
2024 1
2025 1
Total 86
Download as CSV

Nansook Park publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nansook Park sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 83
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nansook Park D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nansook Park sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nansook Park is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the domains of social sciences and psychology, with a focus on education and related subfields.

The main fields of study represented in their work include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Within these fields, the subfields addressed by Park's publications cover:

  • Education
  • Safety Research
  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Philosophy

The research topics frequently explored encompass:

  • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Education Practices and Challenges
  • Education and Teacher Training

Park's recent papers demonstrate a focus on youth and teacher development, wellbeing, and educational engagement. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Positive Youth Development Among Youth Living in Poverty: The Role of Psychological Needs Satisfaction" (2021, Youth & Society)
  • "#ArmMeWith: Resources for Teacher Wellbeing" (2021, International Journal of Wellbeing)
  • "Examining Teacher Well-Being: An Analysis of Resources Needs" (2024, International Journal of Changes in Education)
  • "Does school kindness lead to greater school engagement? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence in the Philippine context" (2023, The Journal of Positive Psychology)
  • "Self-efficacy and work stress among U.S. preschool teachers: the mediating role of anxiety" (2025, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Park include:

  • Christina Costa
  • Fabio Alivernini
  • Dora Bianchi
  • Elisa Cavicchiolo
  • Sara Manganelli

Park's work is regularly published in scholarly journals such as:

  • Youth & Society
  • International Journal of Wellbeing
  • International Journal of Changes in Education
  • The Journal of Positive Psychology
  • Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education

Best Publications

  • Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions.

    Martin E. P. Seligman;Tracy A. Steen;Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson

  • STRENGTHS OF CHARACTER AND WELL-BEING

    Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life.

    Christopher Peterson;Nansook Park;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • The Role of Subjective Well-Being in Positive Youth Development

    Nansook Park

  • Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction

    Christopher Peterson;Willibald Ruch;Ursula Beermann;Nansook Park

  • Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth

    Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson

  • Character strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US states

    Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • Character Strengths: Research and Practice

    Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson

  • Strengths of character and posttraumatic growth.

    Christopher Peterson;Nansook Park;Nnamdi Pole;Wendy D'Andrea

  • Character strengths and happiness among young children: Content analysis of parental descriptions.

    Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson

  • Greater strengths of character and recovery from illness

    Christopher Peterson;Nansook Park;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • Character Strengths Predict Subjective Well-Being During Adolescence

    Jane Gillham;Zoe Adams-Deutsch;Jaclyn Werner;Karen Reivich

  • Positive Psychology and Character Strengths: Application to Strengths-Based School Counseling.

    Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson

  • Zest and work

    Christopher Peterson;Nansook Park;Nicholas Hall;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • Character Strengths and Positive Youth Development

    Nansook Park

  • Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS): Adaptation and Validation of the German Version and the Development of a Peer-Rating Form

    Willibald Ruch;René T. Proyer;Claudia Harzer;Nansook Park

  • Character strengths in the United Kingdom: The VIA Inventory of Strengths

    P. Alex Linley;John Maltby;Alex M. Wood;Stephen Joseph

  • Military children and families: strengths and challenges during peace and war.

    Nansook Park

  • Convergence of Character Strengths in American and Japanese Young Adults

    Satoshi Shimai;Keiko Otake;Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson

  • Three ways to be happy: Pleasure, engagement, and meaning - Findings from Australian and US samples

    Dianne Anne Vella-Brodrick;Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson

  • Positive Organizational Scholarship

    Christopher Peterson;Nansook Park

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher Peterson
Christopher Peterson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Martin E. P. Seligman
Martin E. P. Seligman University of Pennsylvania
E. Scott Huebner
E. Scott Huebner University of South Carolina
Jane E. Gillham
Jane E. Gillham Swarthmore College
Willibald Ruch
Willibald Ruch University of Zurich
Rich Gilman
Rich Gilman Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Stephen Joseph
Stephen Joseph University of Nottingham
Robert F. Valois
Robert F. Valois University of South Carolina
Corey L. M. Keyes
Corey L. M. Keyes Emory University
William Damon
William Damon Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to diverse careers, many of which have unique educational and licensing requirements by state. For example, pursuing a career in applied behavior analysis involves meeting the Wyoming bcba education requirements, which typically include specialized graduate study and supervised experience before certification.

Another popular pathway is social work. Requirements to practice can differ significantly across states. Prospective social workers should understand the steps outlined for becoming a professional, such as learning how to become a social worker in Alabama or meeting the Alaska social work license requirements. These might include completing an accredited degree, passing state exams, and fulfilling supervised work hours.

State-specific regulations are key for career planning. For instance, knowing the requirements to be a social worker in Arizona helps students choose the right educational pathway. Many institutions now offer flexible online psychology and social work programs that meet these varied criteria, making it easier for students nationwide to prepare for rewarding roles in mental health, counseling, and advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Nansook Park

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles