World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
31305
World Ranking
5081
National Ranking
2788

Nansook Park publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nansook Park sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nansook Park D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nansook Park sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nansook Park is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the domains of social sciences and psychology, with a focus on education and related subfields.

The main fields of study represented in their work include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Within these fields, the subfields addressed by Park's publications cover:

  • Education
  • Safety Research
  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Philosophy

The research topics frequently explored encompass:

  • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Education Practices and Challenges
  • Education and Teacher Training

Park's recent papers demonstrate a focus on youth and teacher development, wellbeing, and educational engagement. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Positive Youth Development Among Youth Living in Poverty: The Role of Psychological Needs Satisfaction" (2021, Youth & Society)
  • "#ArmMeWith: Resources for Teacher Wellbeing" (2021, International Journal of Wellbeing)
  • "Examining Teacher Well-Being: An Analysis of Resources Needs" (2024, International Journal of Changes in Education)
  • "Does school kindness lead to greater school engagement? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence in the Philippine context" (2023, The Journal of Positive Psychology)
  • "Self-efficacy and work stress among U.S. preschool teachers: the mediating role of anxiety" (2025, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Park include:

  • Christina Costa
  • Fabio Alivernini
  • Dora Bianchi
  • Elisa Cavicchiolo
  • Sara Manganelli

Park's work is regularly published in scholarly journals such as:

  • Youth & Society
  • International Journal of Wellbeing
  • International Journal of Changes in Education
  • The Journal of Positive Psychology
  • Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education

Best Publications

  • Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions.

    Martin E. P. Seligman;Tracy A. Steen;Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson

  • STRENGTHS OF CHARACTER AND WELL-BEING

    Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life.

    Christopher Peterson;Nansook Park;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • The Role of Subjective Well-Being in Positive Youth Development

    Nansook Park

  • Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction

    Christopher Peterson;Willibald Ruch;Ursula Beermann;Nansook Park

  • Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth

    Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson

  • Character strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US states

    Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • Character Strengths: Research and Practice

    Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson

  • Strengths of character and posttraumatic growth.

    Christopher Peterson;Nansook Park;Nnamdi Pole;Wendy D'Andrea

  • Character strengths and happiness among young children: Content analysis of parental descriptions.

    Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson

  • Greater strengths of character and recovery from illness

    Christopher Peterson;Nansook Park;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • Character Strengths Predict Subjective Well-Being During Adolescence

    Jane Gillham;Zoe Adams-Deutsch;Jaclyn Werner;Karen Reivich

  • Positive Psychology and Character Strengths: Application to Strengths-Based School Counseling.

    Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson

  • Zest and work

    Christopher Peterson;Nansook Park;Nicholas Hall;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • Character Strengths and Positive Youth Development

    Nansook Park

  • Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS): Adaptation and Validation of the German Version and the Development of a Peer-Rating Form

    Willibald Ruch;René T. Proyer;Claudia Harzer;Nansook Park

  • Character strengths in the United Kingdom: The VIA Inventory of Strengths

    P. Alex Linley;John Maltby;Alex M. Wood;Stephen Joseph

  • Military children and families: strengths and challenges during peace and war.

    Nansook Park

  • Convergence of Character Strengths in American and Japanese Young Adults

    Satoshi Shimai;Keiko Otake;Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson

  • Three ways to be happy: Pleasure, engagement, and meaning - Findings from Australian and US samples

    Dianne Anne Vella-Brodrick;Nansook Park;Christopher Peterson

  • Positive Organizational Scholarship

    Christopher Peterson;Nansook Park

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher Peterson
Christopher Peterson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Martin E. P. Seligman
Martin E. P. Seligman University of Pennsylvania
E. Scott Huebner
E. Scott Huebner University of South Carolina
Jane E. Gillham
Jane E. Gillham Swarthmore College
Willibald Ruch
Willibald Ruch University of Zurich
Rich Gilman
Rich Gilman Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Stephen Joseph
Stephen Joseph University of Nottingham
Robert F. Valois
Robert F. Valois University of South Carolina
Corey L. M. Keyes
Corey L. M. Keyes Emory University
William Damon
William Damon Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to diverse careers, many of which have unique educational and licensing requirements by state. For example, pursuing a career in applied behavior analysis involves meeting the Wyoming bcba education requirements, which typically include specialized graduate study and supervised experience before certification.

Another popular pathway is social work. Requirements to practice can differ significantly across states. Prospective social workers should understand the steps outlined for becoming a professional, such as learning how to become a social worker in Alabama or meeting the Alaska social work license requirements. These might include completing an accredited degree, passing state exams, and fulfilling supervised work hours.

State-specific regulations are key for career planning. For instance, knowing the requirements to be a social worker in Arizona helps students choose the right educational pathway. Many institutions now offer flexible online psychology and social work programs that meet these varied criteria, making it easier for students nationwide to prepare for rewarding roles in mental health, counseling, and advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Nansook Park

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles