World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8766 8187 4665 4247 74 8023

Rich Gilman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rich Gilman between 1997 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rich Gilman published across 26 years, from 1997 to 2022, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2014. 2 of the 80 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2014. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 9 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication
1997 2022

80 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rich Gilman: publications per year, 1997 to 2022
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 2
2000 3
2001 3
2002 2
2003 7
2004 7
2005 6
2006 7
2007 4
2008 3
2009 3
2010 1
2011 4
2012 5
2013 1
2014 9
2015 2
2016 2
2017 2
2018 2
2019 0
2020 1
2021 1
2022 1
Total 80
Download as CSV

Rich Gilman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rich Gilman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 74 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 74
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rich Gilman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rich Gilman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Rich Gilman is affiliated with Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in the United States and focuses on research within the health professions. Their scholarly work spans areas such as speech and hearing, radiological and ultrasound technology, and general health professions.

Their research primarily addresses topics related to school health and nursing education, family and patient care in intensive care units, and health, psychology, and well-being. These areas reflect a broad engagement with both clinical and educational aspects of health professions.

Recent publication outputs include:

  • "The Impact of Distress, Personal Meaning & Training on the Delivery of Support to Grieving Students by School Nurses" (2021), published in The Journal of School Nursing
  • "Academic journals can and should contribute to the future of school psychology." (2020), published in School Psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Rich Gilman include Thomas P. Demaria, Donna Mazyck, David J. Schonfeld, and Robin S. Codding. These collaborations suggest an interdisciplinary approach across several health-related topics.

Gilman has published in venues such as The Journal of School Nursing and School Psychology, each venue representing a distinct facet of their research interests related to health and educational psychology.

In recognition of their professional contributions, Rich Gilman was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Characteristics of Adolescents Who Report Very High Life Satisfaction

    Rich Gilman;E. Scott Huebner

  • A review of life satisfaction research with children and adolescents.

    Rich Gilman;Scott Huebner

  • Relative levels of hope and their relationship with academic and psychological indicators among adolescents.

    Rich Gilman;Jameika Dooley;Dan Florell

  • Further Validation of the Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale:

    E. Scott Huebner;James E. Laughlin;Chris Ash;Rich Gilman

  • The Relationship between Life Satisfaction, Social Interest, and Frequency of Extracurricular Activities among Adolescent Students.

    Rich Gilman

  • A first study of the multidimensional students' life satisfaction scale with adolescents

    Rich Gilman;E. Scott Huebner;James E. Laughlin

  • Structured extracurricular activities among adolescents: Findings and implications for school psychologists

    Rich Gilman;Joel Meyers;Laura Perez

  • The relationship between perfectionism and multidimensional life satisfaction among Croatian and American youth

    Rich Gilman;Jeffrey S. Ashby;Dina Sverko;Dan Florell

  • Update on environmental risk factors for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    Tanya E. Froehlich;Julia S. Anixt;Irene M. Loe;Vilawan Chirdkiatgumchai

  • A Multimethod Investigation of the Multidimensionality of Children's Well-Being Reports: Discriminant Validity of Life Satisfaction and Self-Esteem

    E. Scott Huebner;Rich Gilman;James E. Laughlin

  • Students Who Like and Dislike School

    E. Scott Huebner;Rich Gilman

  • Validation of the ostracism experience scale for adolescents.

    Rich Gilman;Adrienne Carter-Sowell;C. Nathan DeWall;Ryan E. Adams

  • Review of Life Satisfaction Measures for Adolescents

    Rich Gilman;EScott Huebner

  • Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Psychosocial Correlates of Adolescent Life Satisfaction Reports

    E. Scott Huebner;Benjamin A. Funk;Rich Gilman

  • Children's reports of their life satisfaction: Convergence across raters, time and response formats.

    Rich Gilman;E. Scott Huebner

  • Electronic and School-Based Victimization: Unique Contexts for Adjustment Difficulties During Adolescence

    Bridget K. Fredstrom;Ryan E. Adams;Rich Gilman

  • Hope as a change mechanism in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Rich Gilman;Jeremiah A. Schumm;Kathleen M. Chard

  • Cross-National Adolescent Multidimensional Life Satisfaction Reports: Analyses of Mean Scores and Response Style Differences

    Rich Gilman;E. Scott Huebner;Lili Tian;Nansook Park

  • An Introduction to the Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale

    E. Scott Huebner;Rich Gilman

  • Cluster-Randomized Trial Demonstrating Impact on Academic Achievement of Elementary Social-Emotional Learning.

    David J. Schonfeld;Ryan E. Adams;Bridget K. Fredstrom;Roger P. Weissberg

  • A First Study of Perfectionism and Multidimensional Life Satisfaction among Adolescents

    Rich Gilman;Jeffrey S. Ashby

  • Validation of the brief multidimensional students' life satisfaction scale among college students.

    Keith J Zullig;E Scott Huebner;Rich Gilman;Jon M Patton

Frequent Co-Authors

E. Scott Huebner
E. Scott Huebner University of South Carolina
Jeffrey S. Ashby
Jeffrey S. Ashby Georgia State University
C. Nathan DeWall
C. Nathan DeWall University of Kentucky
Kenneth G. Rice
Kenneth G. Rice Georgia State University
Kathleen M. Chard
Kathleen M. Chard University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Eric M. Anderman
Eric M. Anderman The Ohio State University
Nansook Park
Nansook Park University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert F. Valois
Robert F. Valois University of South Carolina
Matthew P. Martens
Matthew P. Martens University of Missouri
Keith J. Zullig
Keith J. Zullig West Virginia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to numerous professional opportunities, especially in educational settings. Many students are drawn to school counseling, a field that offers meaningful work supporting children’s academic and emotional development.

If you are interested in this career, it’s essential to understand the varying requirements across different states. For instance, the requirements to be a school counselor in Kansas include specific graduate coursework, state-approved preparation programs, and supervised experience. In Kentucky, the Kentucky school counselor certification requirements also involve graduate-level study plus passing a standardized exam.

Aspiring counselors in Louisiana must meet the Louisiana school counselor certification requirements, which include obtaining a master’s degree in counseling and completing an internship. Similarly, those looking for guidance on how to become a school counselor in Maine will find a focus on both educational credentials and practical training.

For those balancing work and study, many universities now offer online psychology degrees and flexible programs in counseling, making these rewarding career pathways more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Rich Gilman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles