World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Switzerland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 84 1219 1073 12 11 406 27786

Willibald Ruch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Willibald Ruch between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Willibald Ruch published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 9.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2020. 7 of the 431 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2020. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 5 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
1982 2025

431 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Willibald Ruch: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 2
1984 0
1985 5
1986 3
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 5
1991 2
1992 4
1993 8
1994 4
1995 2
1996 7
1997 4
1998 6
1999 2
2000 4
2001 6
2002 1
2003 3
2004 5
2005 7
2006 1
2007 7
2008 9
2009 27
2010 24
2011 18
2012 23
2013 25
2014 27
2015 17
2016 21
2017 21
2018 23
2019 15
2020 30
2021 19
2022 18
2023 14
2024 5
2025 2
Total 431
Download as CSV

Willibald Ruch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Willibald Ruch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–410 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 406 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43 406
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Willibald Ruch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Willibald Ruch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86 84
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Switzerland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Switzerland Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Switzerland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Switzerland Leader Award

Overview

Willibald Ruch is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a substantial concentration in social psychology. Additional subfields include clinical psychology, applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and literature and literary theory.

The scientist's work covers diverse topics within psychological research. These include psychological well-being and life satisfaction, humor studies and applications, optimism, hope, and well-being, resilience and mental health, personality traits and psychology, leadership, courage, and heroism studies, as well as cultural differences and values.

Ruch has authored several papers, notable among them are:

  • Character strengths-based interventions: Open questions and ideas for future research (2020) published in The Journal of Positive Psychology

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include Fabian Gander, Sonja Heintz, Lisa Wagner, Chloé Lau, and Donald H. Saklofske, each contributing through multiple joint publications.

Regarding publication venues, Ruch's work appears predominantly in:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • The Journal of Positive Psychology
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of Personality Assessment
  • Current Psychology

This research profile highlights a focus on character strengths, well-being, and the interplay of personality traits within various life and social domains. The scientist's interdisciplinary approach integrates aspects of social and clinical psychology with applied and experimental methods.

Best Publications

  • The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits Patterns and Profiles of Human Self-Description Across 56 Nations

    David P. Schmitt;Jüri Allik;Robert R. McCrae;Verónica Benet-Martínez

  • Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction

    Christopher Peterson;Willibald Ruch;Ursula Beermann;Nansook Park

  • The Attractive Female Body Weight and Female Body Dissatisfaction in 26 Countries Across 10 World Regions: Results of the International Body Project I

    Viren Swami;David A Frederick;Toivo Aavik;Lidia Alcalay

  • Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands

    David P. Schmitt

  • National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures

    A. Terracciano;A. M. Abdel-Khalek;N. Ádám;L. Adamovová

  • Strength-Based Positive Interventions: Further Evidence for Their Potential in Enhancing Well-Being and Alleviating Depression

    Fabian Gander;René T. Proyer;Willibald Ruch;Tobias Wyss

  • Neural correlates of laughter and humour.

    Barbara Wild;Frank A. Rodden;Wolfgang Grodd;Willibald Ruch

  • Patterns and Universals of Adult Romantic Attachment Across 62 Cultural Regions Are Models of Self and of Other Pancultural Constructs

    David P. Schmitt;Lidia Alcalay;Melissa Allensworth;Jüri Allik

  • Character strengths predict resilience over and above positive affect, self-efficacy, optimism, social support, self-esteem, and life satisfaction

    María Luisa Martínez-Martí;Willibald Ruch

  • Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS): Adaptation and Validation of the German Version and the Development of a Peer-Rating Form

    Willibald Ruch;René T. Proyer;Claudia Harzer;Nansook Park

  • The sense of humor : Explorations of a personality characteristic

    Willibald Ruch

  • The expressive pattern of laughter

    Willibald Ruch;P Ekman;A W Kaszniak

  • Testing Strengths-Based Interventions: A Preliminary Study on the Effectiveness of a Program Targeting Curiosity, Gratitude, Hope, Humor, and Zest for Enhancing Life Satisfaction

    René T. Proyer;Willibald Ruch;Claudia Buschor

  • Exhilaration and humor.

    Willibald Ruch;M Lewis;J M Haviland

  • Patterns and Universals of Mate Poaching Across 53 Nations: The Effects of Sex, Culture, and Personality on Romantically Attracting Another Person's Partner

    David P. Schmitt

  • When the job is a calling: The role of applying one's signature strengths at work

    Claudia Harzer;Willibald Ruch

  • The application of signature character strengths and positive experiences at work

    Claudia Harzer;Willibald Ruch

  • The relationships of character strengths with coping, work-related stress, and job satisfaction

    Claudia Harzer;Willibald Ruch

  • Assessing the „humorous temperament“: Construction of the facet and standard trait forms of the State-Trait-Cheerfulness-Inventory — STCI

    Willibald Ruch;Gabriele Köhler;Christoph Van Thriel

  • Positive psychology interventions in people aged 50–79 years: long-term effects of placebo-controlled online interventions on well-being and depression

    René T Proyer;Fabian Gander;Sara Wellenzohn;Willibald Ruch

Frequent Co-Authors

René T. Proyer
René T. Proyer Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Alois Angleitner
Alois Angleitner Bielefeld University
Paul Ekman
Paul Ekman University of California, San Francisco
Andrea Christiane Samson
Andrea Christiane Samson University of Fribourg
Jan Strelau
Jan Strelau University of Warsaw
Salvatore Attardo
Salvatore Attardo Texas A&M University – Commerce
Christopher Peterson
Christopher Peterson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jamin Halberstadt
Jamin Halberstadt University of Otago
Astrid Schütz
Astrid Schütz University of Bamberg
Martin Voracek
Martin Voracek University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Psychology in the USA opens up a wide range of career opportunities, especially for those interested in supporting mental health and well-being. Online degrees in psychology and counseling offer flexibility for students who need to balance other commitments while gaining the essential knowledge and skills required for professional practice.

If your goal is to become a licensed counselor, it’s important to understand the specific educational and certification requirements that can differ from one location to another. For example, those seeking to become a mental health counselor in Memphis will need to meet local standards, which may differ from those required to meet Mesa mental health counselor education requirements.

Similarly, if you are interested in learning how to become a mental health counselor in Miami or planning a career move to Wisconsin and want to become a mental health counselor in Milwaukee, researching the unique guidance and regulations in each area is vital. By choosing the right online degree and understanding regional pathways, you can take the first step toward a meaningful and in-demand career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Willibald Ruch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles