| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 32 | 10748 | 15 | 97 | 7521 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Strelau between 1972 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Strelau published across 53 years, from 1972 to 2024, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2014. 1 of the 110 publications appeared in the last two years.
110 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1972 | 1 |
| 1973 | 0 |
| 1974 | 1 |
| 1975 | 0 |
| 1976 | 0 |
| 1977 | 0 |
| 1978 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0 |
| 1980 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0 |
| 1982 | 1 |
| 1983 | 3 |
| 1984 | 1 |
| 1985 | 2 |
| 1986 | 1 |
| 1987 | 4 |
| 1988 | 1 |
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 2 |
| 1991 | 6 |
| 1992 | 1 |
| 1993 | 3 |
| 1994 | 4 |
| 1995 | 2 |
| 1996 | 1 |
| 1997 | 5 |
| 1998 | 2 |
| 1999 | 2 |
| 2000 | 6 |
| 2001 | 5 |
| 2002 | 6 |
| 2003 | 2 |
| 2004 | 5 |
| 2005 | 3 |
| 2006 | 2 |
| 2007 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2010 | 2 |
| 2011 | 1 |
| 2012 | 4 |
| 2013 | 0 |
| 2014 | 8 |
| 2015 | 2 |
| 2016 | 5 |
| 2017 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2 |
| 2019 | 3 |
| 2020 | 2 |
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 1 |
| Total | 110 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Strelau sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile
18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 31–40 | 6 | |
| 41–50 | 52 | |
| 51–60 | 138 | |
| 61–70 | 299 | |
| 71–80 | 461 | |
| 81–90 | 605 | |
| 91–100 | 713 | 97 |
| 101–110 | 736 | |
| 111–120 | 686 | |
| 121–130 | 670 | |
| 131–140 | 644 | |
| 141–150 | 597 | |
| 151–160 | 576 | |
| 161–170 | 477 | |
| 171–180 | 450 | |
| 181–190 | 397 | |
| 191–200 | 343 | |
| 201–210 | 328 | |
| 211–220 | 313 | |
| 221–230 | 283 | |
| 231–240 | 226 | |
| 241–250 | 196 | |
| 251–260 | 201 | |
| 261–270 | 171 | |
| 271–280 | 151 | |
| 281–290 | 139 | |
| 291–300 | 113 | |
| 301–310 | 102 | |
| 311–320 | 100 | |
| 321–330 | 76 | |
| 331–340 | 92 | |
| 341–350 | 85 | |
| 351–360 | 69 | |
| 361–370 | 71 | |
| 371–380 | 63 | |
| 381–390 | 58 | |
| 391–400 | 57 | |
| 401–410 | 43 | |
| 411–420 | 33 | |
| 421–430 | 50 | |
| 431–440 | 41 | |
| 441–450 | 32 | |
| 451–460 | 27 | |
| 461–470 | 28 | |
| 471–480 | 25 | |
| 481–490 | 28 | |
| 491–500 | 20 | |
| 501–510 | 23 | |
| 511–520 | 26 | |
| 521–530 | 17 | |
| 531–540 | 21 | |
| 541–550 | 14 | |
| 551–560 | 16 | |
| 561–570 | 10 | |
| 571–580 | 22 | |
| 581–590 | 9 | |
| 591–600 | 14 | |
| 601–610 | 9 | |
| 611–620 | 11 | |
| 621–630 | 4 | |
| 631–640 | 7 | |
| 641–650 | 5 | |
| 651–660 | 10 | |
| 661–670 | 8 | |
| 671–680 | 8 | |
| 681–690 | 4 | |
| 691–700 | 3 | |
| 701–704 | 4 | |
| 705+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Strelau sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile
6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 398 | |
| 32–33 | 702 | 32 |
| 34–35 | 671 | |
| 36–37 | 659 | |
| 38–39 | 641 | |
| 40–41 | 671 | |
| 42–43 | 617 | |
| 44–45 | 558 | |
| 46–47 | 495 | |
| 48–49 | 487 | |
| 50–51 | 445 | |
| 52–53 | 390 | |
| 54–55 | 408 | |
| 56–57 | 345 | |
| 58–59 | 325 | |
| 60–61 | 321 | |
| 62–63 | 248 | |
| 64–65 | 290 | |
| 66–67 | 218 | |
| 68–69 | 219 | |
| 70–71 | 215 | |
| 72–73 | 183 | |
| 74–75 | 169 | |
| 76–77 | 132 | |
| 78–79 | 137 | |
| 80–81 | 120 | |
| 82–83 | 112 | |
| 84–85 | 86 | |
| 86–87 | 101 | |
| 88–89 | 83 | |
| 90–91 | 77 | |
| 92–93 | 70 | |
| 94–95 | 78 | |
| 96–97 | 58 | |
| 98–99 | 53 | |
| 100–101 | 57 | |
| 102–103 | 48 | |
| 104–105 | 53 | |
| 106–107 | 46 | |
| 108–109 | 24 | |
| 110–111 | 35 | |
| 112–113 | 27 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 31 | |
| 118–119 | 22 | |
| 120–121 | 16 | |
| 122–123 | 24 | |
| 124–125 | 18 | |
| 126–127 | 11 | |
| 128–129 | 19 | |
| 130–131 | 10 | |
| 132–133 | 16 | |
| 134–135 | 10 | |
| 136–137 | 12 | |
| 138–139 | 8 | |
| 140–141 | 5 | |
| 142–143 | 12 | |
| 144+ | 98 |
Jan Strelau was affiliated with the University of Warsaw in Poland. Their research contributed to the field of psychology, including temperament studies.
One of their recent papers is titled Μέτρηση της Ιδιοσυγκρασίας για ενήλικες με το Pavlovian Temperament Survey: Προκαταρκτικά ευρήματα για την ελληνική έκδοση και διαπολιτισμική αξιολόγηση, published in 2020 in Psychology the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society.
Throughout their career, Strelau received recognition from several institutions. These included the Polish Academy of Science in 2020 and the Prize of the Foundation for Polish Science in 2000 for work related to the regulative theory of temperament, especially the publication Temperament: A Psychological Perspective (1998). They were also a member of Academia Europaea since 1989.
Charles D. Spielberger;Irwin G. Sarason;Jan Strelau;John M. Brebner
Jan Strelau
Rainer Riemann;Alois Angleitner;Jan Strelau
Jan Strelau
Jan . Strelau;Dariusz . Doliński
Jan Strelau;A. Angleitner
Jan Strelau;Alois Angleitner
David Ball;Linzy Hill;Bernard Freeman;Thalia C. Eley
Jan Strelau;Bogdan Zawadzki
Jan Strelau;Bogdan Zawadzki
Jan Strelau
Jan Strelau;Hans J. Eysenck
Jan Strelau
Jan Strelau
Jan Strelau
Jan Strelau;Alois Angleitner;Jürgen Bantelmann;Willibald Ruch
Roman Cieslak;Joanna Korczynska;Jan Strelau;Magdalena Kaczmarek
Jan Strelau
Jan Strelau;Bogdan Zawadzki
Jan Strelau
J. Strelau;Robert Plomin
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up diverse career opportunities, particularly in counseling and mental health services. Many students are now choosing online programs for added flexibility, which can provide a solid academic foundation for various roles in the field.
One rewarding path is becoming a substance abuse counselor. This role typically requires specialized training and certification, which can vary significantly by region. For example, those looking to meet the San Diego substance abuse counselors education requirements will follow different guidelines compared to those pursuing the San Francisco substance abuse counselor certification requirements.
Similarly, if your goal is becoming a substance abuse counselor in San Jose, you will need to meet specific local standards. For those in Orange County, it’s important to understand the Santa Ana substance abuse counselor certification requirements to ensure compliance and eligibility.
Exploring online psychology degrees can provide a pathway to these in-demand careers, combining theoretical knowledge with practical skills. Stay informed about the requirements in your area to maximize success in this meaningful field.
