World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
33614
World Ranking
8951
National Ranking
501

J. R. Siewert publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. R. Siewert sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 673 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

J. R. Siewert D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. R. Siewert sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. R. Siewert is affiliated with the University of Freiburg in Germany. Their academic profile does not currently list recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications.

There is no available data on specific fields or subfields of study, nor on main topics of work associated with their research activities. Similarly, no awards or recognitions have been recorded.

Without additional specific information on publications or research contributions, detailed insights into their scientific focus or collaborative networks are limited.

Best Publications

  • Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction

    J R Siewert;H J Stein

  • PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial.

    Florian Lordick;Katja Ott;Bernd-Joachim Krause;Wolfgang A Weber

  • Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

    Karen Becker;James D. Mueller;Christoph Schulmacher;Katja Ott

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial 40954.

    Christoph Schuhmacher;Stephan Gretschel;Florian Lordick;Peter Reichardt

  • Prediction of Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagogastric Junction by Metabolic Imaging

    Wolfgang A. Weber;Katja Ott;Karen Becker;Hans-Joachim Dittler

  • Histologic tumor type is an independent prognostic parameter in esophageal cancer: lessons from more than 1,000 consecutive resections at a single center in the Western world.

    J. Siewert;Hubert Stein;Marcus Feith;Björn Bruecher

  • Time Course of Tumor Metabolic Activity During Chemoradiotherapy of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Response to Treatment

    Hinrich A. Wieder;Björn L.D.M. Brücher;Frank Zimmermann;Karen Becker

  • Metabolic imaging predicts response, survival, and recurrence in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction.

    Katja Ott;Wolfgang A. Weber;Florian Lordick;Karen Becker

  • Distinct mechanisms of immunosuppression as a consequence of major surgery.

    T Hensler;H Hecker;K Heeg;C D Heidecke

  • Prognostic factors in gastric carcinoma. Results of the German gastric carcinoma study 1992

    Jürgen D. Roder;Knut Böttcher;J. Rüdiger Siewert;Raymonde Busch

  • FDG PET imaging of locally advanced gastric carcinomas: correlation with endoscopic and histopathological findings.

    Alexander Stahl;Katja Ott;Wolfgang Andreas Weber;Karen Becker

  • Carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction - classification, pathology and extent of resection

    J. R. Siewert;H. J. Stein

  • Prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma

    D. H. Roukos;G. Baltogiannis;D. Cassioumis;J. R. Siewert

  • Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma by metabolic imaging: results of a prospective trial.

    Katja Ott;Ulrich Fink;Karen Becker;Alexander Stahl

  • Preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced and nonresectable gastric cancer: a phase II study with etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin.

    H Wilke;P Preusser;U Fink;U Gunzer

  • Comparison of two density gradient centrifugation systems for the enrichment of disseminated tumor cells in blood.

    R. Rosenberg;R. Gertler;J. Friederichs;K. Fuehrer

  • Ratio of invaded to removed lymph nodes as a predictor of survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus

    J. D. Roder;R. Busch;H. J. Stein;U. Fink

  • [Cardia cancer: attempt at a therapeutically relevant classification].

    J R Siewert;A H Hölscher;K Becker;W Gössner

  • Benefits of D2 lymph node dissection for patients with gastric cancer and pN0 and pN1 lymph node metastases

    J R Siewert;R Kestlmeier;R Busch;K Böttcher

  • Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancer

    H Bartels;H J Stein;J R Siewert

Frequent Co-Authors

Hubert J. Stein
Hubert J. Stein Paracelsus Medical University
Heinz Höfler
Heinz Höfler Technical University of Munich
Florian Lordick
Florian Lordick Leipzig University
Raymonde Busch
Raymonde Busch Technical University of Munich
Bernhard Holzmann
Bernhard Holzmann Technical University of Munich
Robert D. Rosenberg
Robert D. Rosenberg Technical University of Munich
Markus Schwaiger
Markus Schwaiger Technical University of Munich
Christian Peschel
Christian Peschel Technical University of Munich
Wolfgang A. Weber
Wolfgang A. Weber Technical University of Munich
Hermann Wagner
Hermann Wagner Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in medicine or seeking ways to build upon your existing healthcare education, there are several online pathways to advance your credentials. These flexible, accredited programs can help streamline your journey into specialized roles or administration.

For nurses aiming for leadership or teaching positions, online dnp programs provide advanced training with the added benefit of accommodating busy schedules. Those looking to enter the workforce quickly can explore a 9 month lpn program, offering practical nursing credentials in less than a year.

If you have a passion for mental health, online pmhnp programs prepare you for specialized roles supporting psychiatric and mental health needs. Meanwhile, those interested in the business side of healthcare can pursue a health care administration degree online to qualify for roles in management, policy, or hospital operations.

Each pathway offers unique challenges and rewards, so be sure to research program requirements and career outcomes to find the best fit for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing J. R. Siewert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles