World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
18111
World Ranking
19462
National Ranking
9689

Peter C. Wollan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Wollan sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 173 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter C. Wollan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Wollan sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter C. Wollan is affiliated with the University of Rochester in the United States. Their academic profile reflects an established presence within their institutional environment.

Though specific publications and recent papers are not listed for this researcher, the available data indicates a scholarly career without detailed records of individual works or co-authors. There is no information on frequent publication venues, which suggests either a diversified publication record or limited public data on this aspect.

Similarly, there is no recorded data on book publications tied to particular publishers or on main or subfields of study. This absence restricts insights into particular areas of specialization or the primary domains of their scientific work.

The lack of listed main topics of work or awards further limits detailed description of academic focus or recognized achievements in their career.

The comprehensive data available does confirm the current living status of Peter C. Wollan, without historical details or contextual biographical remarks.

Best Publications

  • A population-based study of the incidence and complication rates of herpes zoster before zoster vaccine introduction.

    Barbara P. Yawn;Patricia Saddier;Peter C. Wollan;Jennifer L. St. Sauver

  • "Malignancy" in meningiomas: a clinicopathologic study of 116 patients, with grading implications.

    Arie Perry;Bernd W. Scheithauer;Scott L. Stafford;Christine M. Lohse

  • Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery

    Seth E. Lerner;Craig A. Hawkins;Michael L. Blute;Andreas Grabner

  • Stronger back muscles reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures: a prospective 10 year follow-up of postmenopausal women

    M. Sinaki;E. Itoi;H.W. Wahner;P. Wollan

  • Population-based incidence and survival figures in essential thrombocythemia and agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: an Olmsted County Study, 1976-1995.

    Ruben A. Mesa;Murray N. Silverstein;Steven J. Jacobsen;Peter C. Wollan

  • COMPARISON OF SCREENING METHODS IN THE DETECTION OF BLADDER CANCER

    Sanjay Ramakumar;Jalaluddin Bhuiyan;Jalaluddin Bhuiyan;Jennifer A. Besse;Jennifer A. Besse;Steven G. Roberts;Steven G. Roberts

  • Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma: What do we really know about it

    Caterina Giannini;Bernd W. Scheithauer;Peter C. Burger;Daniel J. Brat

  • Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery. Commentary. Authors' reply

    S. E. Lerner;C. A. Hawkins;M. L. Blute;A. Grabner

  • Fish oil supplementation in type 2 diabetes: a quantitative systematic review.

    V M Montori;A Farmer;P C Wollan;S F Dinneen

  • Syncope in children and adolescents

    David J Driscoll;Steven J Jacobsen;Co-burn J Porter;Peter C Wollan

  • Langerhans' cell histiocytosis (histiocytosis X) of bone. A clinicopathologic analysis of 263 pediatric and adult cases.

    Scott E. Kilpatrick;Doris E. Wenger;Gerald S. Gilchrist;Thomas C. Shives

  • CARCINOSARCOMA AND SARCOMATOID CARCINOMA OF THE BLADDER: CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF 41 CASES

    A. Lopez-Beltran;A. Pacelli;H.J. Rothenberg;P.C. Wollan

  • Organizing pneumonia. Features and prognosis of cryptogenic, secondary, and focal variants.

    Robert H. Lohr;Benoit J. Boland;William W. Douglas;David H. Dockrell

  • Long-term trends in carpal tunnel syndrome

    R. Gelfman;L. J. Melton;B. P. Yawn;P. C. Wollan

  • Herpes Zoster Recurrences More Frequent Than Previously Reported

    Barbara P. Yawn;Peter C. Wollan;Marge J. Kurland;Jennifer L. St. Sauver

  • THE PERCENT OF CORES POSITIVE FOR CANCER IN PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY SPECIMENS IS STRONGLY PREDICTIVE OF TUMOR STAGE AND VOLUME AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

    Thomas J. Sebo;Brian J. Bock;John C. Cheville;Christine Lohse

  • Retrospective review of 1170 endosseous implants placed in partially edentulous jaws

    Steven E. Eckert;Peter C. Wollan

  • The extent and multicentricity of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in clinically localized prostatic adenocarcinoma

    Junqi Qian;Peter Wollan;David G Bostwick

  • Use of electron-beam computed tomography in the evaluation of chest pain patients in the emergency department.

    Dennis A Laudon;Larry F Vukov;Jerome F Breen;John A Rumberger

  • Making vaccines more acceptable--methods to prevent and minimize pain and other common adverse events associated with vaccines

    Robert M Jacobson;Avril Swan;Adedunni Adegbenro;Sarah L Ludington

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara P. Yawn
Barbara P. Yawn University of Minnesota
Steven J. Jacobsen
Steven J. Jacobsen Kaiser Permanente
Michael L. Blute
Michael L. Blute Harvard University
David G. Bostwick
David G. Bostwick Bostwick Laboratories
David H. Dockrell
David H. Dockrell University of Edinburgh
Amy L. Weaver
Amy L. Weaver Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in health professions beyond traditional medical school? There are diverse online degree options to consider. For registered nurses looking to advance, many universities offer cheap rn to bsn online programs that can help you earn a bachelor’s degree flexibly and affordably.

If you hold a bachelor’s degree in a non-nursing field, you may want to explore direct entry msn programs online. These accelerated programs make it possible to transition into nursing and obtain a Master of Science in Nursing more quickly than traditional routes.

For those seeking accessible entry points into nursing, it’s worth researching the easiest rn program to get into. These schools can provide opportunities to launch your healthcare career sooner, especially if you’re concerned about competitive admission.

Not all healthcare careers require direct patient care. You might also consider administrative roles; there are accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid that teach essential skills for work in healthcare settings while also offering financial support.

Exploring these related online degrees can open a range of fulfilling medical and healthcare careers beyond the MD pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Peter C. Wollan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles