World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Horst Zincke

Horst Zincke

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
120
Citations
46359
World Ranking
3787
National Ranking
2080

Horst Zincke publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Horst Zincke sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 471 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Horst Zincke D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Horst Zincke sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 120 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Horst Zincke was affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States during their scientific career. Their research contributions were part of the broader scientific activity at this institution, although specific details about their research topics and publications are not documented here.

No recent papers authored by Horst Zincke are listed, and there are no records of frequent co-authors or common publication venues associated with their work. Similarly, there are no recorded book publications under their name.

The available data does not provide information on main fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics explored by Horst Zincke. Likewise, there are no documented awards or recognitions linked to their career.

Best Publications

  • Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma.

    John C. Cheville;Christine M. Lohse;Horst Zincke;Amy L. Weaver

  • An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score.

    Igor Frank;Michael L. Blute;John C. Cheville;Christine M. Lohse

  • Solid Renal Tumors: An Analysis of Pathological Features Related to Tumor Size

    Igor Frank;Michael L. Blute;John C. Cheville;Christine M. Lohse

  • Costimulatory b7-h1 in renal cell carcinoma patients: indicator of tumor aggressiveness and potential therapeutic target

    Lieping Chen;Scott E. Strome;Eugene D. Kwon

  • Tumor B7-H1 is associated with poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma patients with long-term follow-up.

    R. Houston Thompson;Susan M. Kuntz;Bradley C. Leibovich;Haidong Dong

  • Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs. nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney.

    Wko Lau;ML Blute;AL Weaver;VE Torres

  • Long-Term (15 Years) Results After Radical Prostatectomy For Clinically Localized (Stage T2c Or Lower) Prostate Cancer

    Horst Zincke;Joseph E. Oesterling;Michael L. Blute;Erik J. Bergstralh

  • Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a stratification tool for prospective clinical trials.

    Bradley C. Leibovich;Michael L. Blute;John C. Cheville;M B S Christine Lohse

  • Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy

    Bradley C. Leibovich;Michael L. Blute;John C. Cheville;Christine M. Lohse

  • The Mayo Clinic experience with surgical management, complications and outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumour thrombus

    Michael L. Blute;Bradley C. Leibovich;Christine M. Lohse;John C. Cheville

  • Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate‐specific antigen testing: 15‐year outcome

    John F. Ward;Jeffrey M. Slezak;Michael L. Blute;Erik J. Bergstralh

  • Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery

    Seth E. Lerner;Craig A. Hawkins;Michael L. Blute;Andreas Grabner

  • Defining prostate specific antigen progression after radical prostatectomy: what is the most appropriate cut point?

    Christopher L. Amling;Erik J. Bergstralh;Michael L. Blute;Jeffrey M. Slezak

  • 618: Costimulatory B7-H1 In Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients: Indicator of Tumor Aggressiveness and Potential Therapeutic Target

    R. Houston Thompson;Michael D. Gillett;John C. Cheville;Christine M. Lohse

  • LONG-TERM HAZARD OF PROGRESSION AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER: CONTINUED RISK OF BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE AFTER 5 YEARS

    Christopher L. Amling;Michael L. Blute;Erik J. Bergstralh;Thomas M. Seay

  • Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: an examination of underlying histologic subtype and an analysis of associations with patient outcome.

    John C Cheville;Christine M Lohse;Horst Zincke;Amy L Weaver

  • Risk of prostate carcinoma death in patients with lymph node metastasis.

    Liang Cheng;Horst Zincke M.D.;Michael L. Blute;Erik J. Bergstralh

  • Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

    Michael L. Blute;Erik J. Bergstralh;Angelo Iocca;Beth Scherer

  • Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery. Commentary. Authors' reply

    S. E. Lerner;C. A. Hawkins;M. L. Blute;A. Grabner

  • Progression and Survival after Renal-Conserving Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Experience in 104 Patients and Extended Followup

    William R. Morgan;Horst Zincke

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael L. Blute
Michael L. Blute Harvard University
John C. Cheville
John C. Cheville Mayo Clinic
David G. Bostwick
David G. Bostwick Bostwick Laboratories
Thomas J. Sebo
Thomas J. Sebo Mayo Clinic
Amy L. Weaver
Amy L. Weaver Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in medicine but looking for alternative pathways or flexible learning options, there are several online degrees and careers worth considering. Many students begin with nursing, and there are now online adn programs that offer a practical entry point into the healthcare field while allowing you to study remotely.

For those more interested in the administrative side, best online healthcare administration degree programs can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals and clinics—often at an accelerated pace.

Not all nursing schools have the same requirements. Some of the do all nursing schools require the teas schools do not require entrance exams like the TEAS or HESI, making that first step in a healthcare career more accessible.

Interested in behind-the-scenes roles? There are also medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid, providing vital skills for administrative work in the medical sector.

Best Scientists Citing Horst Zincke

Recently Published Articles