World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas J. Sebo

Thomas J. Sebo

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
23363
World Ranking
12853
National Ranking
6571

Thomas J. Sebo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Sebo sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 248 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thomas J. Sebo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Sebo sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas J. Sebo is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. The available data does not specify particular fields or subfields of study associated with their research activities.

There is no recorded information on recent papers, frequent co-authors, or typical publication venues linked to Thomas J. Sebo. Similarly, no data on book publications or awards received is available.

No documented main topics or specialized areas within scientific research have been detailed in the records provided.

This profile reflects the current extent of publicly available information regarding Thomas J. Sebo's academic and research contributions.

Best Publications

  • Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a study of 900 cases observed in a 60-year period.

    Ian D. Hay;Maeve E. Hutchinson;Tomas Gonzalez-Losada;Bryan McIver

  • Tumor B7-H1 is associated with poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma patients with long-term follow-up.

    R. Houston Thompson;Susan M. Kuntz;Bradley C. Leibovich;Haidong Dong

  • Observer variation in the diagnosis of follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma

    Ricardo V Lloyd;Lori A Erickson;Mary B Casey;King Y Lam

  • Extent of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus correlates with risk of adenocarcinoma

    Navtej S. Buttar;Kenneth K. Wang;Thomas J. Sebo;Darren M. Riehle

  • A COMPARISON OF CYTOLOGY AND FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION FOR THE DETECTION OF UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA

    Kevin C. Halling;Walter King;Irina A. Sokolova;Reid G. Meyer

  • PD-L1 (B7-H1) expression by urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and BCG-induced granulomata: associations with localized stage progression.

    Brant A. Inman;Thomas J. Sebo;Xavier Frigola;Haidong Dong

  • Pituitary carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 15 cases.

    Peter J. Pernicone;Bernd W. Scheithauer;Thomas J. Sebo;Kalman T. Kovacs

  • Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma: Pathologic analysis of 73 cases

    Jean E. Lewis;Kerry D. Olsen;Thomas J. Sebo

  • Fas enhances fibrogenesis in the bile duct ligated mouse: a link between apoptosis and fibrosis.

    Ali Canbay;Hajime Higuchi;Steven F. Bronk;Makiko Taniai

  • Effect of growth hormone, glutamine, and diet on adaptation in short- bowel syndrome: A randomized, controlled study

    JS Scolapio;M Camilleri;CR Fleming;LV Oenning

  • Urachal carcinoma: clinicopathologic features and long-term outcomes of an aggressive malignancy.

    Richard A. Ashley;Brant A. Inman;Thomas J. Sebo;Bradley C. Leibovich

  • A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.

    Benjamin R Kipp;Linda M Stadheim;Shari A Halling;Nicole L Pochron

  • Prospective analysis of computerized tomography and needle biopsy with permanent sectioning to determine the nature of solid renal masses in adults

    Christopher B. Dechet;Horst Zincke;Thomas J. Sebo;Bernard F. King

  • Advanced Cytologic Techniques for the Detection of Malignant Pancreatobiliary Strictures

    Laura E. Moreno Luna;Benjamin Kipp;Kevin C. Halling;Thomas J. Sebo

  • Pathobiology of pituitary adenomas and carcinomas.

    Bernd W. Scheithauer;Thomas A. Gaffey;Ricardo V. Lloyd;Thomas J. Sebo

  • B7-H3 Ligand Expression by Prostate Cancer: A Novel Marker of Prognosis and Potential Target for Therapy

    Timothy J. Roth;Yuri Sheinin;Christine M. Lohse;Susan M. Kuntz

  • p300 in Prostate Cancer Proliferation and Progression

    Jose D. Debes;Thomas J. Sebo;Christine M. Lohse;Linda M. Murphy

  • THE PERCENT OF CORES POSITIVE FOR CANCER IN PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY SPECIMENS IS STRONGLY PREDICTIVE OF TUMOR STAGE AND VOLUME AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

    Thomas J. Sebo;Brian J. Bock;John C. Cheville;Christine Lohse

  • A Comparison of BTA Stat, Hemoglobin Dipstick, Telomerase and Vysis Urovysion Assays for the Detection of Urothelial Carcinoma in Urine

    Kevin C. Halling;Walter King;Irina A. Sokolova;R. Jeffrey Karnes

  • CYSTIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA IS CURED BY RESECTION: A STUDY OF 24 CASES WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOWUP

    Federico A. Corica;Kenneth A. Iczkowski;Liang Cheng;Horst Zincke

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael L. Blute
Michael L. Blute Harvard University
John C. Cheville
John C. Cheville Mayo Clinic
Horst Zincke
Horst Zincke Mayo Clinic
Ricardo V. Lloyd
Ricardo V. Lloyd University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kenneth K. Wang
Kenneth K. Wang Mayo Clinic
Clive S. Grant
Clive S. Grant Mayo Clinic
Gregory J. Gores
Gregory J. Gores Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in pursuing a career in healthcare but want alternative routes to traditional medical school, online degrees in medical and nursing fields can be a flexible and affordable option. Many roles, such as medical billing and coding specialist, nurse practitioner, or RN, can be prepared for through online programs.

For those seeking a cost-effective entry into healthcare, consider exploring the cheapest medical coding certification online. This path requires less time and investment while offering strong job prospects. Aspiring nurses can compare how much is online nursing school to find affordable routes to becoming an RN.

If advancing your nursing career interests you, there are programs dedicated to helping RNs become nurse practitioners. Learn more about the cheapest np programs online for a higher level of practice and earning potential. Experienced nurses looking to move into education or leadership may want to explore a phd nursing education online.

Each of these online pathways can offer flexibility and affordability, making healthcare careers more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Sebo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles