World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 81 16828 15824 885 853 588 18321

Benedikt Schoser publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Benedikt Schoser between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Benedikt Schoser published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 27.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 214 publications in 2009. 57 of the 840 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150 200
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 214. Peak 214 publications in 2009. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 214 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 44 publications 2019: 57 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 39 publications 2023: 44 publications 2024: 53 publications 2025: 56 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

840 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Benedikt Schoser: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 3
1998 3
1999 8
2000 2
2001 5
2002 2
2003 2
2004 9
2005 7
2006 13
2007 16
2008 9
2009 214
2010 13
2011 23
2012 17
2013 18
2014 17
2015 26
2016 30
2017 32
2018 44
2019 57
2020 34
2021 42
2022 39
2023 44
2024 53
2025 56
2026 1
Total 840
Download as CSV

Benedikt Schoser publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benedikt Schoser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 588 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 588
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Benedikt Schoser D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benedikt Schoser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 81
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Benedikt Schoser is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their work primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions in subfields such as Physiology, Molecular Biology, Neurology, Rheumatology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The research topics covered by Schoser include:

  • Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research

Schoser has co-authored frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Jordi Díaz-Manera
  • Priya S. Kishnani
  • António Toscano
  • Tahseen Mozaffar
  • Mazen M. Dimachkie

The scientist has published extensively in venues focused on neuromuscular and neurological disorders. Prominent publication venues include:

  • Neuromuscular Disorders
  • Molecular Genetics and Metabolism
  • Journal of Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases

Among recent scholarly papers, notable works by or involving Schoser include:

  • Safety and efficacy of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat versus alglucosidase alfa plus placebo in late-onset Pompe disease (PROPEL): an international, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial, 2021, The Lancet Neurology
  • Safety and efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa versus alglucosidase alfa in patients with late-onset Pompe disease (COMET): a phase 3, randomised, multicentre trial, 2021, The Lancet Neurology
  • "Neurological manifestations of COVID-19" - guideline of the German society of neurology, 2020, Neurological Research and Practice
  • Guideline for the management of myasthenic syndromes, 2023, Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
  • New genotype-phenotype correlations in a large European cohort of patients with sarcoglycanopathy, 2020, Brain

Best Publications

  • Non-ATG–initiated translation directed by microsatellite expansions

    Tao Zu;Brian Gibbens;Noelle S. Doty;Mário Gomes-Pereira

  • Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study

    James F Howard;Kimiaki Utsugisawa;Michael Benatar;Hiroyuki Murai

  • Anti-LRP4 autoantibodies in AChR- and MuSK-antibody-negative myasthenia gravis.

    Alexandra Pevzner;Benedikt Schoser;Katja Peters;Nicoleta-Carmen Cosma

  • The myopathic form of coenzyme Q10 deficiency is caused by mutations in the electron-transferring-flavoprotein dehydrogenase (ETFDH) gene

    Klaus Gempel;Haluk Topaloglu;Beril Talim;Peter Schneiderat

  • Misregulated alternative splicing of BIN1 is associated with T tubule alterations and muscle weakness in myotonic dystrophy

    Charlotte Fugier;Arnaud F Klein;Caroline Hammer;Stéphane Vassilopoulos

  • Transplantation of genetically corrected human iPSC-derived progenitors in mice with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy

    Francesco Saverio Tedesco;Francesco Saverio Tedesco;Mattia F. M. Gerli;Laura Perani;Sara Benedetti

  • Enzyme replacement therapy with alglucosidase alfa in 44 patients with late-onset glycogen storage disease type 2: 12-month results of an observational clinical trial.

    S. Strothotte;N. Strigl-Pill;B. Grunert;C. Kornblum

  • Late onset Pompe disease: clinical and neurophysiological spectrum of 38 patients including long-term follow-up in 18 patients.

    Wolfgang Müller-Felber;Rita Horvath;Klaus Gempel;Teodor Podskarbi

  • Mutations in CAV3 cause mechanical hyperirritability of skeletal muscle in rippling muscle disease

    Regina C. Betz;Benedikt G. H. Schoser;Dagmar Kasper;Kenneth Ricker

  • Survival and long-term outcomes in late-onset Pompe disease following alglucosidase alfa treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Benedikt Schoser;Andrew Stewart;Steve Kanters;Alaa Hamed

  • Enzyme replacement therapy in late-onset Pompe disease: a systematic literature review

    Antonio Toscano;Benedikt Schoser

  • Hexosamine biosynthetic pathway mutations cause neuromuscular transmission defect.

    Jan Senderek;Jan Senderek;Juliane S. Müller;Marina Dusl;Tim M. Strom

  • Safety and Treatment Effects of Nusinersen in Longstanding Adult 5q-SMA Type 3 - A Prospective Observational Study.

    Maggie C. Walter;Stephan Wenninger;Simone Thiele;Julia Stauber

  • Anti-agrin autoantibodies in myasthenia gravis

    Christiane Gasperi;Arthur Melms;Benedikt Schoser;Yina Zhang

  • Pathological consequences of VCP mutations on human striated muscle

    Christian U. Hübbers;Christoph S. Clemen;Kristina Kesper;Annett Böddrich

  • Myofibrillar myopathies: a clinical and myopathological guide.

    Rolf Schröder;Benedikt Schoser

  • Polyglucosan body myopathy caused by defective ubiquitin ligase RBCK1

    Johanna Nilsson;Benedikt Schoser;Pascal Laforet;Ognian Kalev

  • Dystrophin-deficient pigs provide new insights into the hierarchy of physiological derangements of dystrophic muscle

    Nikolai Klymiuk;Andreas Blutke;Alexander Graf;Sabine Krause

  • An X-Linked Myopathy with Postural Muscle Atrophy and Generalized Hypertrophy, Termed XMPMA, Is Caused by Mutations in FHL1

    Christian Windpassinger;Christian Windpassinger;Benedikt Schoser;Volker Straub;Sonja Hochmeister

  • 36 months observational clinical study of 38 adult Pompe disease patients under alglucosidase alfa enzyme replacement therapy

    Caroline Regnery;Cornelia Kornblum;Frank Hanisch;Stefan Vielhaber

Frequent Co-Authors

Hanns Lochmüller
Hanns Lochmüller University of Freiburg
Volker Straub
Volker Straub Newcastle University
Priya S. Kishnani
Priya S. Kishnani Duke University
Rita Horvath
Rita Horvath University of Cambridge
Barry J. Byrne
Barry J. Byrne University of Florida
Richard J. Barohn
Richard J. Barohn University of Missouri
Thomas Klopstock
Thomas Klopstock Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Alan Pestronk
Alan Pestronk Washington University in St. Louis
Darren G. Monckton
Darren G. Monckton University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career options beyond a traditional medical degree can be a valuable strategy for those interested in healthcare. Many accredited online programs now offer flexible pathways to rewarding roles within the field.

Nursing is one of the most popular alternate routes. If you already hold an associate’s degree in nursing, consider the adn to fnp bridge programs to fast-track your way to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner. Similarly, for RNs seeking more autonomy, learning does rn to bsn require clinicals can clarify your next educational steps.

If you are interested in nutrition, there are excellent online degrees in nutrition that can prepare you for roles in dietetics, wellness coaching, and clinical nutrition.

For a career in healthcare leadership, it’s vital to know how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs and select one with strong accreditation and program outcomes.

Each of these online education paths can lead to impactful careers in health and medicine, often with greater flexibility and diverse opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Benedikt Schoser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles