World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
12916
World Ranking
4153
National Ranking
1881

Christian G. Kohler publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christian G. Kohler sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 152 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Christian G. Kohler D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christian G. Kohler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christian G. Kohler is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and psychology, focusing particularly on psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, and social psychology. They have contributed to studies involving molecular biology and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The main topics in Kohler's research include schizophrenia research and treatment, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health treatment and access, functional brain connectivity studies, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, digital mental health interventions, and bipolar disorder and treatment.

Kohler's recent publications demonstrate a focus on neuropsychology, schizophrenia, and related brain function studies. Selected works include:

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of intellectual, neuropsychological, and psychoeducational functioning in neurofibromatosis type 1 (2022), published in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • Dopamine D1R Receptor Stimulation as a Mechanistic Pro-cognitive Target for Schizophrenia (2021), published in Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Diminished reward responsiveness is associated with lower reward network GluCEST: an ultra-high field glutamate imaging study (2021), published in Molecular Psychiatry
  • Effect of mGluR2 positive allosteric modulation on frontostriatal working memory activation in schizophrenia (2021), published in Molecular Psychiatry
  • Pennsylvania coordinated specialty care programs for first-episode psychosis: 6- and 12-month outcomes (2020), published in Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Frequent collaborators in Kohler's research include Monica E. Calkins, Raquel E. Gur, Daniel H. Wolf, Ruben C. Gur, and David R. Roalf.

Their work is commonly published in venues such as Biological Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Research, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Early Intervention in Psychiatry, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Best Publications

  • Facial Emotion Perception in Schizophrenia: A Meta-analytic Review

    Christian G. Kohler;Jeffrey B. Walker;Elizabeth A. Martin;Kristin M. Healey

  • Facial Emotion Recognition in Schizophrenia: Intensity Effects and Error Pattern

    Christian G. Kohler;Travis H. Turner;Warren B. Bilker;Colleen M. Brensinger

  • An fMRI Study of Facial Emotion Processing in Patients With Schizophrenia

    Raquel E. Gur;Claire McGrath;Robin M. Chan;Lee Schroeder

  • Emotion recognition deficit in schizophrenia: association with symptomatology and cognition.

    Christian G Kohler;Warren Bilker;Michael Hagendoorn;Raquel E Gur

  • Computerized neurocognitive scanning: I. Methodology and validation in healthy people.

    Ruben C Gur;J Daniel Ragland;Paul J Moberg;Travis H Turner

  • Differences in facial expressions of four universal emotions

    Christian G. Kohler;Travis Turner;Neal M. Stolar;Warren B. Bilker

  • Facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia: when and why does it go awry?

    Bruce I. Turetsky;Christian G. Kohler;Tim Indersmitten;Mahendra T. Bhati

  • Automated Facial Action Coding System for Dynamic Analysis of Facial Expressions in Neuropsychiatric Disorders

    Jihun Hamm;Christian G. Kohler;Ruben C. Gur;Ruben C. Gur;Ragini Verma

  • Self-face recognition and theory of mind in patients with schizophrenia and first-degree relatives

    Farzin Irani;Steven M. Platek;Ivan S. Panyavin;Monica E. Calkins

  • Flat Affect in Schizophrenia: Relation to Emotion Processing and Neurocognitive Measures

    Raquel E Gur;Christian G Kohler;J Daniel Ragland;Steven J Siegel

  • Facial emotion perception in depression and bipolar disorder: A quantitative review

    Christian G. Kohler;Lauren J. Hoffman;Lucas B. Eastman;Kristin Healey

  • Limbic activation associated with misidentification of fearful faces and flat affect in schizophrenia.

    Raquel E. Gur;James Loughead;Christian G. Kohler;Mark A. Elliott

  • Event-Related fMRI of Frontotemporal Activity During Word Encoding and Recognition in Schizophrenia

    J. Daniel Ragland;Ruben C. Gur;Jeffrey Valdez;Bruce I. Turetsky

  • Computerized neurocognitive scanning: II. The profile of schizophrenia.

    Ruben C. Gur;John D Ragland;Paul J. Moberg;Warren B. Bilker

  • A meta-analysis of emotion perception and functional outcomes in schizophrenia.

    Farzin Irani;Farzin Irani;Sarah Seligman;Vidyulata Kamath;Christian Kohler

  • Meta-Analysis of Olfactory Function in Schizophrenia, First-Degree Family Members, and Youths At-Risk for Psychosis

    Paul J. Moberg;Vidyulata Kamath;Dana M. Marchetto;Monica E. Calkins

  • Effect of schizophrenia on frontotemporal activity during word encoding and recognition : A PET cerebral blood flow study

    J. Daniel Ragland;Ruben C. Gur;Jonathan Raz;Lee Schroeder

  • Psychiatric Manifestations of Paraneoplastic Disorders

    Matthew S. Kayser;Christian G. Kohler;Josep Dalmau

  • Prognostic variables at intake and long-term level of function in schizophrenia.

    Steven J. Siegel;Farzin Irani;Colleen M. Brensinger;Christian G. Kohler

  • Profile of auditory information-processing deficits in schizophrenia

    Bruce I. Turetsky;Warren B. Bilker;Steven J. Siegel;Christian G. Kohler

  • Impairment in Emotion Recognition Abilities in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment, Early and Moderate Alzheimer Disease Compared With Healthy Comparison Subjects

    Elisabeth M. Weiss;Christian G. Kohler;Julia Vonbank;Edith Stadelmann

  • A sexually dimorphic ratio of orbitofrontal to amygdala volume is altered in schizophrenia.

    Raquel E Gur;Christian Kohler;Bruce I Turetsky;Steven J Siegel

Frequent Co-Authors

Raquel E. Gur
Raquel E. Gur University of Pennsylvania
Ruben C. Gur
Ruben C. Gur University of Pennsylvania
Monica E. Calkins
Monica E. Calkins University of Pennsylvania
Warren B. Bilker
Warren B. Bilker University of Pennsylvania
Bruce I. Turetsky
Bruce I. Turetsky University of Pennsylvania
Steven J. Siegel
Steven J. Siegel University of Southern California
Daniel H. Wolf
Daniel H. Wolf University of Pennsylvania
James Loughead
James Loughead University of Pennsylvania
Tyler M. Moore
Tyler M. Moore University of Pennsylvania
J. Daniel Ragland
J. Daniel Ragland University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Christian G. Kohler

Trending Scientists