World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
70
Citations
21583
World Ranking
2487
National Ranking
1179

Daniel H. Wolf publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel H. Wolf sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 190 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daniel H. Wolf D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel H. Wolf sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel H. Wolf is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a significant focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, as well as Molecular Biology.

The researcher's work addresses various main topics, including Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Schizophrenia research and treatment, Mental Health Research Topics, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Neural dynamics and brain function, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies.

Wolf has contributed extensively to scientific literature, with frequent publications in venues such as Biological Psychiatry, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Schizophrenia, Schizophrenia Bulletin, and Molecular Psychiatry.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel H. Wolf include:

  • MRI signatures of brain age and disease over the lifespan based on a deep brain network and 14,468 individuals worldwide (2020), Brain
  • Individual Variation in Functional Topography of Association Networks in Youth (2020), Neuron
  • Two distinct neuroanatomical subtypes of schizophrenia revealed using machine learning (2020), Brain
  • Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA (2020), NeuroImage
  • Natural language processing methods are sensitive to sub-clinical linguistic differences in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (2021), Schizophrenia

Among frequent co-authors, Daniel H. Wolf has collaborated numerous times with:

  • Raquel E. Gur
  • Theodore D. Satterthwaite
  • Ruben C. Gur
  • Monica E. Calkins
  • Tyler M. Moore

Best Publications

  • An Improved Framework for Confound Regression and Filtering for Control of Motion Artifact in the Preprocessing of Resting-State Functional Connectivity Data

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Mark A. Elliott;Raphael T. Gerraty;Kosha Ruparel

  • Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth.

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Daniel H. Wolf;James Loughead;Kosha Ruparel

  • Subcortical brain volume abnormalities in 2028 individuals with schizophrenia and 2540 healthy controls via the ENIGMA consortium

    T. G M van Erp;D. P. Hibar;J. M. Rasmussen;D. C. Glahn

  • Cortical Brain Abnormalities in 4474 Individuals With Schizophrenia and 5098 Control Subjects via the Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics Through Meta Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium

    Unknown

  • Benchmarking of participant-level confound regression strategies for the control of motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity.

    Rastko Ciric;Daniel H. Wolf;Jonathan D. Power;David R. Roalf

  • Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder : An MRI analysis of 6503 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group

    D P Hibar;L T Westlye;L T Westlye;N T Doan;N T Doan;N Jahanshad

  • Subcortical volumetric abnormalities in bipolar disorder

    D. P. Hibar;L. T. Westlye;L. T. Westlye;T. G. M. van Erp;J. Rasmussen

  • Linked dimensions of psychopathology and connectivity in functional brain networks.

    Cedric Huchuan Xia;Zongming Ma;Rastko Ciric;Shi Gu;Shi Gu

  • Harmonization of large MRI datasets for the analysis of brain imaging patterns throughout the lifespan.

    Raymond Pomponio;Guray Erus;Mohamad Habes;Jimit Doshi

  • Linked Sex Differences in Cognition and Functional Connectivity in Youth

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Daniel H. Wolf;David R. Roalf;Kosha Ruparel

  • MRI signatures of brain age and disease over the lifespan based on a deep brain network and 14 468 individuals worldwide.

    Vishnu M Bashyam;Guray Erus;Jimit Doshi;Mohamad Habes

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group

    Laura K.M. Han;Richard Dinga;Richard Dinga;Tim Hahn;Christopher R.K. Ching

  • Age-Related Effects and Sex Differences in Gray Matter Density, Volume, Mass, and Cortical Thickness from Childhood to Young Adulthood.

    Efstathios D. Gennatas;Brian B. Avants;Daniel H. Wolf;Theodore D. Satterthwaite

  • Mitigating head motion artifact in functional connectivity MRI

    Rastko Ciric;Adon F. G. Rosen;Guray Erus;Matthew Cieslak

  • Erratum: Subcortical brain volume abnormalities in 2028 individuals with schizophrenia and 2540 healthy controls via the ENIGMA consortium (Molecular Psychiatry (2015) DOI:10.1038/mp.2015.63)

    T. G.M. Van Erp;D. P. Hibar;J. M. Rasmussen;D. C. Glahn

  • Functional maturation of the executive system during adolescence.

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Daniel H. Wolf;Guray Erus;Kosha Ruparel

  • Limbic activation associated with misidentification of fearful faces and flat affect in schizophrenia.

    Raquel E. Gur;James Loughead;Christian G. Kohler;Mark A. Elliott

  • The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: constructing a deep phenotyping collaborative

    Monica E. Calkins;Kathleen R. Merikangas;Tyler M. Moore;Marcy Burstein

  • Individual Variation in Functional Topography of Association Networks in Youth

    Zaixu Cui;Hongming Li;Cedric H. Xia;Bart Larsen

  • Heterogeneous impact of motion on fundamental patterns of developmental changes in functional connectivity during youth.

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Daniel H. Wolf;Kosha Ruparel;Güray Erus

  • Cortical thickness across the lifespan: Data from 17,075 healthy individuals aged 3-90 years

    Sophia Frangou;Amirhossein Modabbernia;Steven C. R. Williams;Efstathios Papachristou

  • The psychosis spectrum in a young U.S. community sample: findings from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort.

    Monica E. Calkins;Tyler M. Moore;Kathleen R. Merikangas;Marcy Burstein

  • Common and Dissociable Dysfunction of the Reward System in Bipolar and Unipolar Depression

    Theodore D Satterthwaite;Joseph W Kable;Lillie Vandekar;Natalie Katchmar

  • Common and Dissociable Mechanisms of Executive System Dysfunction Across Psychiatric Disorders in Youth.

    Sheila Shanmugan;Daniel H. Wolf;Monica E. Calkins;Tyler M. Moore

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruben C. Gur
Ruben C. Gur University of Pennsylvania
Theodore D. Satterthwaite
Theodore D. Satterthwaite University of Pennsylvania
Raquel E. Gur
Raquel E. Gur University of Pennsylvania
Monica E. Calkins
Monica E. Calkins University of Pennsylvania
David R. Roalf
David R. Roalf University of Pennsylvania
Kosha Ruparel
Kosha Ruparel University of Pennsylvania
Tyler M. Moore
Tyler M. Moore University of Pennsylvania
Mark A. Elliott
Mark A. Elliott University of Pennsylvania
Russell T. Shinohara
Russell T. Shinohara University of Pennsylvania
Christos Davatzikos
Christos Davatzikos University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel H. Wolf

Trending Scientists