World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 39 7814 7539 285 281 161 4972

Isabella Lancellotti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Isabella Lancellotti between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Isabella Lancellotti published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2021. 15 of the 219 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2021. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 7 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 7 publications
1996 2025

219 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Isabella Lancellotti: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 7
2001 15
2002 8
2003 3
2004 9
2005 9
2006 5
2007 3
2008 7
2009 6
2010 14
2011 5
2012 5
2013 15
2014 8
2015 11
2016 8
2017 7
2018 7
2019 4
2020 14
2021 16
2022 9
2023 6
2024 8
2025 7
Total 219
Download as CSV

Isabella Lancellotti publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Isabella Lancellotti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 158–167 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 161 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415 161
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Isabella Lancellotti D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Isabella Lancellotti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385 39
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Isabella Lancellotti is affiliated with the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia in Italy and has contributed extensively to research in engineering, with a strong focus on building and construction. Their scholarly output spans a variety of interconnected fields including civil and structural engineering, materials chemistry, earth-surface processes, and plant science.

The main research topics addressed by Lancellotti include:

  • Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
  • Concrete and cement materials research
  • Building materials and conservation
  • Recycled aggregate concrete performance
  • Magnesium oxide properties and applications
  • Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Hygrothermal properties of building materials

Lancellotti has published multiple papers related to these areas. Some of the recent works include:

  • Alkali Activation of Metallurgical Slags: Reactivity, Chemical Behavior, and Environmental Assessment (2021), published in Materials
  • Management of agricultural waste biomass as raw material for the construction sector: an analysis of sustainable and circular alternatives (2022), published in Environmental Sciences Europe
  • Dependence of the geopolymerization process and end-products to the nature of solid precursors: Challenge of the sustainability (2020), published in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Potentiality of the Use of Pyroclastic Volcanic Residues in the Production of Alkali Activated Material (2020), published in Waste and Biomass Valorization
  • Geopolymer-Based Stabilization of Heavy Metals, the Role of Chemical Agents in Encapsulation and Adsorption: Review (2025), published in Polymers

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, notably:

  • Luisa Barbieri (31 joint publications)
  • Cristina Leonelli (21 joint publications)
  • Fernanda Andreola (18 joint publications)
  • Fabiana Altimari (8 joint publications)
  • Caterina Sgarlata (6 joint publications)

Major publication venues for Lancellotti include:

  • Applied Sciences (8 publications)
  • Materials (7 publications)
  • Environmental Engineering and Management Journal (4 publications)
  • Frontiers in Materials (3 publications)
  • Polymers (2 publications)

Best Publications

  • CRT glass state of the art: A case study: Recycling in ceramic glazes

    Fernanda Andreola;Luisa Barbieri;Anna Corradi;Isabella Lancellotti

  • Recycling of industrial wastes in ceramic manufacturing: State of art and glass case studies

    Fernanda Andreola;Luisa Barbieri;Isabella Lancellotti;Cristina Leonelli

  • Alkaline and alkaline-earth silicate glasses and glass-ceramics from municipal and industrial wastes

    Luisa Barbieri;Anna Corradi Bonamartini;Isabella Lancellotti

  • Management of agricultural biomass wastes: preliminary study on characterization and valorisation in clay matrix bricks.

    Luisa Barbieri;Fernanda Andreola;Isabella Lancellotti;Rosa Taurino

  • Alkali activation as new option for gold mine tailings inertization

    Jenni Kiventerä;Isabella Lancellotti;Michelina Catauro;Francesco Dal Poggetto

  • Chemical stability of geopolymers containing municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash.

    Isabella Lancellotti;Elie Kamseu;Marco Michelazzi;Luisa Barbieri

  • Design, obtainment and properties of glasses and glass-ceramics from coal fly ash

    Luisa Barbieri;Isabella Lancellotti;Tiziano Manfredini;Ignasi Queralt

  • Glass waste as supplementary cementing materials: The effects of glass chemical composition

    M. C. Bignozzi;A. Saccani;Luisa Barbieri;Isabella Lancellotti

  • Microwave Thermal Inertisation of Asbestos Containing Waste and Its Recycling in Traditional Ceramics

    Leonelli C;Veronesi P;Boccaccini Dn;Rivasi Mr

  • Crystallization of (Na2O–MgO)–CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 Glassy Systems Formulated from Waste Products

    Luisa Barbieri;Anna Maria Ferrari;Isabella Lancellotti;Cristina Leonelli

  • Glass-ceramics obtained by the recycling of end of life cathode ray tubes glasses.

    F. Andreola;L. Barbieri;A. Corradi;I. Lancellotti

  • Mix-design and characterization of alkali activated materials based on metakaolin and ladle slag

    Maria Chiara Bignozzi;Stefania Manzi;Isabella Lancellotti;Elie Kamseu

  • Vitrification of industrial and natural wastes with production of glass fibres

    G. Scarinci;G. Brusatin;Luisa Barbieri;Anna Corradi

  • Recycling of CRT panel glass as fluxing agent in the porcelain stoneware tile production

    Fernanda Andreola;Luisa Barbieri;E. Karamanova;Isabella Lancellotti

  • Bulk and sintered glass-ceramics by recycling municipal incinerator bottom ash

    Luisa Barbieri;Anna Corradi;Isabella Lancellotti

  • Inorganic polymers from alkali activation of metakaolin: Effect of setting and curing on structure

    Isabella Lancellotti;Michelina Catauro;Chiara Ponzoni;Flavia Bollino

  • Sintered sanidine glass-ceramics from industrial wastes

    E. Bernardo;R. Castellan;S. Hreglich;Isabella Lancellotti

  • Design of glass foams with low environmental impact

    C. Mugoni;M. Montorsi;C. Siligardi;F. Andreola

  • Environmental friendly management of CRT glass by foaming with waste egg shells, calcite or dolomite

    Hugo R. Fernandes;Diana D. Ferreira;Fernanda Andreola;Isabella Lancellotti

  • The use of egg shells to produce Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) glass foams

    Hugo R. Fernandes;Fernanda Andreola;Luisa Barbieri;Isabella Lancellotti

  • Glass matrix composites from solid waste materials

    Monica Ferraris;Milena Salvo;Federico Smeacetto;Laurent Augier

  • Utilisation of municipal incinerator grate slag for manufacturing porcelainized stoneware tiles manufacturing

    F Andreola;L Barbieri;A Corradi;I Lancellotti

  • Alkali activation processes for incinerator residues management.

    Isabella Lancellotti;Chiara Ponzoni;Luisa Barbieri;Cristina Leonelli

  • Reuse of incinerator bottom and fly ashes to obtain glassy materials

    F. Andreola;L. Barbieri;S. Hreglich;I. Lancellotti

  • Cathode ray tube glass recycling: an example of clean technology:

    Fernanda Andreola;Luisa Barbieri;Anna Corradi;Isabella Lancellotti

  • Post-treated incinerator bottom ash as alternative raw material for ceramic manufacturing

    L.M. Schabbach;F. Andreola;L. Barbieri;I. Lancellotti

  • Sintered Glass–Ceramics and Glass–Ceramic Matrix Composites from CRT Panel Glass

    E. Bernardo;F. Andreola;L. Barbieri;I. Lancellotti

Frequent Co-Authors

Cristina Leonelli
Cristina Leonelli University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Federica Bondioli
Federica Bondioli Polytechnic University of Turin
Michelina Catauro
Michelina Catauro University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Elie Kamseu
Elie Kamseu University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Ivano Vassura
Ivano Vassura University of Bologna
Fabrizio Passarini
Fabrizio Passarini University of Bologna
Mirja Illikainen
Mirja Illikainen University of Oulu
Enrico Bernardo
Enrico Bernardo University of Padua
Paolo Colombo
Paolo Colombo University of Padua
José M.F. Ferreira
José M.F. Ferreira University of Aveiro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring engineering and technology is just the beginning. Many students and professionals are now diversifying their skillsets by enrolling in quick, career-boosting online programs. These accelerated options can complement your technical background with financial, business, or legal expertise, increasing your competitiveness in the job market.

For those interested in finance, an accelerated finance degree online can equip you with essential business acumen in a fraction of the traditional timeframe. If you aspire to move into leadership roles, consider a 6 month MBA program to quickly gain critical management skills.

Legal knowledge is also valuable in tech sectors. An accelerated paralegal program can open doors to compliance, intellectual property, and patent roles. Similarly, the best online bookkeeping certificate programs offer quick pathways to essential skills for project and budget management.

These flexible online programs provide diverse opportunities to broaden your career options and stay competitive in the rapidly evolving engineering and technology fields.

Best Scientists Citing Isabella Lancellotti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles