World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 74 578 504 275 237 198 24166

Kosha Ruparel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kosha Ruparel between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kosha Ruparel published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2020. 39 of the 247 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2020. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 27 publications
2005 2025

247 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kosha Ruparel: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 1
2007 3
2008 3
2009 7
2010 2
2011 5
2012 4
2013 10
2014 17
2015 14
2016 23
2017 23
2018 15
2019 16
2020 27
2021 18
2022 7
2023 11
2024 12
2025 27
Total 247
Download as CSV

Kosha Ruparel publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kosha Ruparel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 198 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 198
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Kosha Ruparel D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kosha Ruparel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43 74
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Kosha Ruparel is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a focus on several key subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Molecular Biology, Clinical Psychology, and Epidemiology.

Their research topics cover a range of areas within brain and mental health studies, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Congenital heart defects research
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Coronary Artery Anomalies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Kosha Ruparel has coauthored extensively with several researchers, including Ruben C. Gur, Raquel E. Gur, Tyler M. Moore, David R. Roalf, and Monica E. Calkins. The frequent collaborations suggest engagement in multidisciplinary and longitudinal projects within neuroscience and psychiatry.

Their research is commonly published in venues such as Biological Psychiatry, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Molecular Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Bulletin, and Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging. These journals indicate a focus on psychiatric and neurological research.

Among their recent notable publications are:

  • "Pitfalls in brain age analyses" (2021) published in Human Brain Mapping
  • "Longitudinal Development of Brain Iron Is Linked to Cognition in Youth" (2020) published in Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Optimization of energy state transition trajectory supports the development of executive function during youth" (2020) published in eLife
  • "Mapping Subcortical Brain Alterations in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Effects of Deletion Size and Convergence With Idiopathic Neuropsychiatric Illness" (2020) published in American Journal of Psychiatry
  • "Executive function after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: does current mood and early life adversity matter?" (2020) published in Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society

Best Publications

  • An Improved Framework for Confound Regression and Filtering for Control of Motion Artifact in the Preprocessing of Resting-State Functional Connectivity Data

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Mark A. Elliott;Raphael T. Gerraty;Kosha Ruparel

  • Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain.

    Madhura Ingalhalikar;Alex Smith;Drew Parker;Theodore D. Satterthwaite

  • Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth.

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Daniel H. Wolf;James Loughead;Kosha Ruparel

  • Harmonization of multi-site diffusion tensor imaging data.

    Jean-Philippe Fortin;Drew Parker;Birkan Tunç;Takanori Watanabe

  • Benchmarking of participant-level confound regression strategies for the control of motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity.

    Rastko Ciric;Daniel H. Wolf;Jonathan D. Power;David R. Roalf

  • Baby Schema in Infant Faces Induces Cuteness Perception and Motivation for Caretaking in Adults

    Melanie L. Glocker;Daniel D. Langleben;Kosha Ruparel;James W. Loughead

  • Neuroimaging of the Philadelphia neurodevelopmental cohort.

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Mark A. Elliott;Kosha Ruparel;James Loughead

  • Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: Application to lie detection

    Christos Davatzikos;Kosha Ruparel;Yong Fan;Dinggang Shen

  • Development of structure–function coupling in human brain networks during youth

    Graham L. Baum;Graham L. Baum;Zaixu Cui;Zaixu Cui;David R. Roalf;David R. Roalf;Rastko Ciric

  • Linked dimensions of psychopathology and connectivity in functional brain networks.

    Cedric Huchuan Xia;Zongming Ma;Rastko Ciric;Shi Gu;Shi Gu

  • Quantitative assessment of structural image quality.

    Adon F.G. Rosen;David R. Roalf;Kosha Ruparel;Jason Blake

  • Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women

    Melanie L. Glocker;Daniel D. Langleben;Daniel D. Langleben;Kosha Ruparel;James W. Loughead

  • Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event‐related fMRI

    Daniel D. Langleben;James W. Loughead;Warren B. Bilker;Kosha Ruparel

  • Modular Segregation of Structural Brain Networks Supports the Development of Executive Function in Youth

    Graham L. Baum;Rastko Ciric;David R. Roalf;Richard F. Betzel

  • The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: A publicly available resource for the study of normal and abnormal brain development in youth.

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;John J. Connolly;Kosha Ruparel;Monica E. Calkins

  • Linked Sex Differences in Cognition and Functional Connectivity in Youth

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Daniel H. Wolf;David R. Roalf;Kosha Ruparel

  • Neural substrates for functionally discriminating self-face from personally familiar faces

    Steven M. Platek;James W. Loughead;Ruben C. Gur;Samantha Busch

  • Age-Related Effects and Sex Differences in Gray Matter Density, Volume, Mass, and Cortical Thickness from Childhood to Young Adulthood.

    Efstathios D. Gennatas;Brian B. Avants;Daniel H. Wolf;Theodore D. Satterthwaite

  • Functional maturation of the executive system during adolescence.

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Daniel H. Wolf;Guray Erus;Kosha Ruparel

  • Limbic activation associated with misidentification of fearful faces and flat affect in schizophrenia.

    Raquel E. Gur;James Loughead;Christian G. Kohler;Mark A. Elliott

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruben C. Gur
Ruben C. Gur University of Pennsylvania
Raquel E. Gur
Raquel E. Gur University of Pennsylvania
Theodore D. Satterthwaite
Theodore D. Satterthwaite University of Pennsylvania
David R. Roalf
David R. Roalf University of Pennsylvania
Tyler M. Moore
Tyler M. Moore University of Pennsylvania
Monica E. Calkins
Monica E. Calkins University of Pennsylvania
Daniel H. Wolf
Daniel H. Wolf University of Pennsylvania
Mark A. Elliott
Mark A. Elliott University of Pennsylvania
Russell T. Shinohara
Russell T. Shinohara University of Pennsylvania
James Loughead
James Loughead University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in pursuing a flexible career in Social Sciences or Humanities? Online degrees have opened new doors for students who need flexible, affordable options. Many accredited programs now offer pathways to advanced roles in psychology, counseling, education, and related fields.

For those looking into clinical psychology, psyd psychology programs can lead to licensure and clinical practice. If your focus is on marriage and family therapy, consider exploring mft accredited programs that offer interactive training and client-based learning fully online.

If affordability is your priority, you can find an online masters degree psychology that fits your budget while preparing you for diverse careers in counseling, research, or organizational settings. For professionals aiming to advance leadership roles in education, the fastest edd program online options allow you to earn a doctorate in education faster while balancing your work and studies.

With these online pathways, a fulfilling career in the Social Sciences and Humanities is more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Kosha Ruparel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles