World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
9931
World Ranking
16673
National Ranking
6893

Ching-Juh Lai publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ching-Juh Lai sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 73 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ching-Juh Lai D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ching-Juh Lai sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ching-Juh Lai is affiliated with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in the United States. This institution is a key center for research on infectious agents and immune system disorders, indicating that Lai's work is likely centered around these scientific fields.

No information is available regarding specific recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with Lai. Likewise, there are no listed book publications, main fields or subfields of study, or defined main research topics associated with their profile. Additionally, no awards or honors have been reported.

While detailed documentation of Lai's research output and collaborations is not provided, their role at a prominent national research institute suggests involvement in ongoing scientific investigations related to allergy and infectious disease.

Best Publications

  • Both nonstructural proteins NS2B and NS3 are required for the proteolytic processing of dengue virus nonstructural proteins.

    B. Falgout;M. Pethel;Yi-Ming Zhang;Ching-Juh Lai

  • Dengue type 4 virus mutants containing deletions in the 3' noncoding region of the RNA genome: analysis of growth restriction in cell culture and altered viremia pattern and immunogenicity in rhesus monkeys

    R Men;M Bray;D Clark;R M Chanock

  • Monoclonal antibody-mediated enhancement of dengue virus infection in vitro and in vivo and strategies for prevention

    Ana P. Goncalvez;Ronald E. Engle;Marisa St. Claire;Robert H. Purcell

  • Sequences of mRNAs derived from genome RNA segment 7 of influenza virus: colinear and interrupted mRNAs code for overlapping proteins

    Robert A. Lamb;Ching-Juh Lai;Purnell W. Choppin

  • Attenuation and immunogenicity in humans of a live dengue virus type-4 vaccine candidate with a 30 nucleotide deletion in its 3'-untranslated region.

    Anna P. Durbin;Ruth A. Karron;Wellington Sun;David W. Vaughn

  • Sequence of interrupted and uninterrupted mRNAs and cloned DNA coding for the two overlapping nonstructural proteins of influenza virus.

    Robert A. Lamb;Ching-Juh Lai

  • Infectious RNA transcribed from stably cloned full-length cDNA of dengue type 4 virus.

    Ching-Juh Lai;Bangti Zhao;Hiroyuki Hori;Michael Bray

  • Cloning full-length dengue type 4 viral DNA sequences: analysis of genes coding for structural proteins.

    Bangti Zhao;Erich Mackow;Alicia Buckler-White;Lewis Markoff

  • The nucleotide sequence of dengue type 4 virus: Analysis of genes coding for nonstructural proteins

    Erich Mackow;Yoshihiro Makino;Bangti Zhao;Yi-Ming Zhang

  • Proper processing of dengue virus nonstructural glycoprotein NS1 requires the N-terminal hydrophobic signal sequence and the downstream nonstructural protein NS2a.

    B Falgout;R Chanock;C J Lai

  • Construction and characterization of chimeric tick-borne encephalitis/dengue type 4 viruses.

    Alexander G. Pletnev;Michael Bray;John Huggins;Ching-Juh Lai

  • Mapping the spliced and unspliced late lytic SV40 RNAs

    Ching-Juh Lai;Ravi Dhar;George Khoury

  • Growth-restricted dengue virus mutants containing deletions in the 5' noncoding region of the RNA genome.

    Annie Cahour;Alexander Pletnev;Marie Vazeille-Falcoz;Leon Rosen

  • Splicing as a requirement for biogenesis of functional 16S mRNA of simian virus 40.

    Peter Gruss;Ching-Juh Lai;Ravi Dhar;George Khoury

  • Chimeric tick-borne encephalitis and dengue type 4 viruses: effects of mutations on neurovirulence in mice.

    A. G. Pletnev;M. Bray;Ching-Juh Lai

  • Construction of intertypic chimeric dengue viruses by substitution of structural protein genes

    Michael Bray;Ching-Juh Lai

  • Cleavage of the dengue virus polyprotein at the NS3/NS4A and NS4B/NS5 junctions is mediated by viral protease NS2B-NS3, whereas NS4A/NS4B may be processed by a cellular protease.

    A. Cahour;B. Falgout;Ching-Juh Lai

  • Genetic determinants of dengue type 4 virus neurovirulence for mice.

    H. Kawano;V. Rostapshov;L. Rosen;Ching-Juh Lai

  • Mapping of the two overlapping genes for polypeptides NS1 and NS2 on RNA segment 8 of influenza virus genome.

    Robert A. Lamb;Purnell W. Choppin;Robert M. Chanock;Ching-Juh Lai

  • Mice immunized with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing dengue 4 virus structural proteins with or without nonstructural protein NS1 are protected against fatal dengue virus encephalitis.

    M. Bray;Bangti Zhao;L. Markoff;K. H. Eckels

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian R. Murphy
Brian R. Murphy National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Kathryn A. Hanley
Kathryn A. Hanley New Mexico State University
Robert H. Purcell
Robert H. Purcell National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Robert M. Chanock
Robert M. Chanock National Institutes of Health
George Khoury
George Khoury National Institutes of Health
Ravi Dhar
Ravi Dhar Yale University
Kenneth H. Eckels
Kenneth H. Eckels Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
Francis A. Ennis
Francis A. Ennis University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Félix A. Rey
Félix A. Rey Institut Pasteur
Ichiro Kurane
Ichiro Kurane National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to dynamic careers in healthcare, research, and nutrition. Today, there are many flexible online degree options that prepare students for in-demand roles in allied health and science.

For those interested in nutrition, a masters in nutrition online provides an affordable way to build advanced knowledge and qualify for specialist positions. Another sought-after pathway is becoming a registered dietitian; students may consider dietetic masters programs to meet credentialing requirements and expand career options.

Technology-focused options are also available. Careers in medical imaging begin with training from an ultrasound tech school or pursuing radiology tech online programs. These programs offer flexible learning for those seeking quick entry or career advancement in diagnostic healthcare.

Whether you're looking to specialize in nutrition or explore technical roles in healthcare, online degrees make it easier than ever to find the right educational and career pathway in biological sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Ching-Juh Lai

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles