World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Robert M. Chanock publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Chanock sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert M. Chanock D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Chanock sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1981 - Robert Koch Prize

Overview

Robert M. Chanock was affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their career involved contributions to the scientific community recognized through awards such as the Robert Koch Prize, which was awarded in 1981.

No specific publications, co-authors, or detailed research topics have been recorded in the available data. The absence of documented recent papers and frequent publication venues suggests that a comprehensive bibliographic record is not present here.

Details regarding Robert M. Chanock's main fields of study, subfields, and primary research topics are also not captured in the current dataset. Similarly, there are no records of book publications linked to this scientist in the provided information.

This profile is based solely on the data available and reflects an overview of Robert M. Chanock's professional identification and recognition through the award. The scientist is noted to be deceased, and the presentation follows a past-tense description accordingly.

Best Publications

  • GROWTH ON ARTIFICIAL MEDIUM OF AN AGENT ASSOCIATED WITH ATYPICAL PNEUMONIA AND ITS IDENTIFICATION AS A PPLO

    R. M. Chanock;L. Hayflick;M. F. Barile

  • A large array of human monoclonal antibodies to type 1 human immunodeficiency virus from combinatorial libraries of asymptomatic seropositive individuals.

    Dennis R. Burton;Carlos F. Barbas;Mats A. A. Persson;Scott Koenig

  • EPIDEMIOLOGY OF RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS INFECTION IN WASHINGTON, D.C.I. IMPORTANCE OF THE VIRUS IN DIFFERENT RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE SYNDROMES AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OF INFECTION

    Hyun Wha Kim;Julita O. Arrobio;Carl D. Brandt;Barbara C. Jeffries

  • Production of infectious human respiratory syncytial virus from cloned cDNA confirms an essential role for the transcription elongation factor from the 5' proximal open reading frame of the M2 mRNA in gene expression and provides a capability for vaccine development

    Peter L. Collins;Myron G. Hill;Ena Camargo;Haim Grosfeld

  • Recovery in tracheal organ cultures of novel viruses from patients with respiratory disease.

    Kenneth McIntosh;Jane H. Dees;Walter B. Becker;Albert Z. Kapikian

  • Independent segregation of two antigenic specificities (VP3 and VP7) involved in neutralization of rotavirus infectivity.

    Yasutaka Hoshino;Mitzi M. Sereno;Karen Midthun;Jorge Flores

  • Expression of the F glycoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus by a recombinant vaccinia virus: comparison of the individual contributions of the F and G glycoproteins to host immunity

    Robert A. Olmsted;Narayanasamy Elango;Gregory A. Prince;Brian R. Murphy

  • Association of Serum Anti-Neuraminidase Antibody with Resistance to Influenza in Man

    Brian R. Murphy;Julius A. Kasel;Robert M. Chanock

  • ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY (ELISA) FOR DETECTION OF HUMAN REOVIRUS-LIKE AGENT OF INFANTILE GASTROENTERITIS

    Robert H. Yolken;Hyun Wha Kim;Thomas Clem;Richard G. Wyatt

  • Attenuation and immunogenicity in humans of a live dengue virus type-4 vaccine candidate with a 30 nucleotide deletion in its 3'-untranslated region.

    Anna P. Durbin;Ruth A. Karron;Wellington Sun;David W. Vaughn

  • A mouse model for investigating the molecular pathogenesis of adenovirus pneumonia.

    Harold S. Ginsberg;Lyle L. Moldawer;Pravinkumar B. Sehgal;Miriam Redington

  • INFECTIONS IN 18, 000 INFANTS AND CHILDREN IN A CONTROLLED STUDY OF RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE. I. ADENOVIRUS PATHOGENICITY IN RELATION TO SEROLOGIC TYPE AND ILLNESS SYNDROME

    Carl D. Brandt;Hyun Wha Kim;Andrew J. Vargosko;Barbara C. Jeffries

  • Role of early region 3 (E3) in pathogenesis of adenovirus disease.

    Harold S. Ginsberg;Ulla Lundholm-Beauchamp;Robert L. Horswood;Benvenuto Pernis

  • A colour test for the measurement of antibody to certain mycoplasma species based upon the inhibition of acid production.

    D. Taylor-Robinson;R. H. Purcell;D. C. Wong;R. M. Chanock

  • Protective effect of antibody to parainfluenza type 1 virus.

    C B Smith;R H Purcell;J A Bellanti;R M Chanock

  • Evaluation of a live, cold-passaged, temperature-sensitive, respiratory syncytial virus vaccine candidate in infancy

    Peter F. Wright;Ruth A. Karron;Robert B. Belshe;Juliette Thompson

  • Genes of human (strain Wa) and bovine (strain UK) rotaviruses that code for neutralization and subgroup antigens

    Anthony R. Kalica;Harry B. Greenberg;Richard G. Wyatt;Jorge Flores

  • Biological properties of Norwalk agent of acute infectious nonbacterial gastroenteritis.

    Raphael Dolin;Raphael Dolin;Neil R. Blacklow;Neil R. Blacklow;Herbert L Dupont;Herbert L Dupont;Robert F. Buscho;Robert F. Buscho

  • Human rotavirus type 2: cultivation in vitro

    Richard G. Wyatt;Walter D. James;Edward H. Bohl;Kenneth W. Theil

  • Reoviruslike Agent in Stools: Association with Infantile Diarrhea and Development of Serologic Tests

    Albert Z. Kapikian;Hyun Wha Kim;Richard G. Wyatt;William J. Rodriguez

  • A mouse model for investigating the molecular pathogenesis of

    Harold S. Ginsberg;L Lyle;Pravinkumar B. SEHGALt;Miriam Redington

Frequent Co-Authors

Albert Z. Kapikian
Albert Z. Kapikian National Institutes of Health
Brian R. Murphy
Brian R. Murphy National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Karl M. Johnson
Karl M. Johnson Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Robert H. Purcell
Robert H. Purcell National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Harry B. Greenberg
Harry B. Greenberg Stanford University
Yasutaka Hoshino
Yasutaka Hoshino National Institutes of Health
William T. London
William T. London National Institutes of Health
James E. Crowe
James E. Crowe Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Gregory A. Prince
Gregory A. Prince National Institutes of Health
Peter L. Collins
Peter L. Collins National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens various career pathways, many of which can be complemented by online degrees. For those seeking flexible learning options, exploring programs that suit diverse backgrounds is essential. For example, if you face challenges like a criminal record, consider the best degree for felons that provide second chances and promising career prospects.

Microbiology graduates might also explore the healthcare sector. Pursuing qualifications like becoming a functional medicine nurse practitioner combines biological understanding with patient care, offering rewarding career growth.

Alternatively, roles in health information and administrative fields are growing rapidly. Careers such as medical coding offer competitive salaries, so investigating opportunities like the certified professional coder salary and certification pathways can be valuable.

Additionally, a health information management bachelor degree salary reflects the promising future for those managing healthcare data—a field increasingly essential as medical technology advances.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Chanock

Recently Published Articles